When a single, moving stimulus is presented in the peripheral visual field, its direction of motion can be easily distinguished, but when the same stimulus is flanked by other similar moving stimuli, observers are unable to report its direction of motion. In this condition, known as 'crowding', specific features of visual stimuli do not access conscious perception. The aim of this study was to investigate whether adaptation to spiral motion is preserved in crowding conditions. Logarithmic spirals were used as adapting stimuli. A rotating spiral stimulus (target spiral) was presented, flanked by spirals of the same type, and observers were adapted to its motion. The observers' task was to report the rotational direction of a directionally ambiguous motion (test stimulus) presented afterwards. The directionally ambiguous motion consisted of a pair of spirals flickering in counterphase, which were mirror images of the target spiral. Although observers were not aware of the rotational direction of the target and identified it at chance levels, the direction of rotation reported by the observers during the test phase (motion aftereffect) was contrarotational to the direction of the adapting spiral. Since all contours of the adapting and test stimuli were 90 degrees apart, local motion detectors tuned to the directions of the mirror-image spiral should fail to respond, and therefore not adapt to the adapting spiral. Thus, any motion aftereffect observed should be attributed to adaptation of global motion detectors (ie rotation detectors). Hence, activation of rotation-selective cells is not necessarily correlated with conscious perception.

When two flickering sources are far enough apart to avoid low-level motion signals, phase judgment relies on the temporal individuation of the light and dark phases of each source. The highest rate at which the individuation can be maintained has been referred to as Gestalt flicker fusion [Van de Grind, W. A., Grüsser, O. -J., & Lunkenheimer, H. U. (1973). Temporal transfer properties of the afferent visual system. Psychophysical, neurophysiological and theoretical investigations. In R. Jung (Ed.), Handbook of sensory physiology (Vol. VII/3, pp. 431-573). Berlin: Springer, Chapter 7] and this has been taken as a measure of the temporal resolution of attention [Verstraten, F. A., Cavanagh, P., & Labianca, A. T. (2000). Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention. Vision Research, 40, 3651-3664; Battelli, L., Cavanagh, P., Intriligator, J., Tramo, M. J., Henaff, M. A., Michel, F., et al. (2001). Unilateral right parietal damage leads to bilateral deficit for high-level motion. Neuron, 32, 985-995]. Here we examine the variation of the temporal resolution of attention across the visual field using phase judgments of widely spaced pairs of flickering dots presented either in the upper or lower visual field and at either 4 degrees or 14 degrees eccentricity. We varied inter-dot separation to determine the spacing at which phase discriminations are no longer facilitated by low-level motion signals. Our data for these long-range phase judgments showed that temporal resolution decreases only slightly with increased distance from center of gaze (decrease from 11.4 to 8.9 Hz between 4 degrees to 14 degrees ), and does not differ between upper and lower visual fields. We conclude that the variation of the temporal limits of visual attention across the visual field differs markedly from that of the spatial resolution of attention.

In this study, we investigated the effect of attention on local motion detectors. For this purpose we used logarithmic spirals previously used by Cavanagh and Favreau [Perception, 1980, 9(2), 175-182]. While the adapting stimulus was a rotating logarithmic spiral, the test stimulus was either the same spiral or its mirror image. When superimposed, all contours of the spiral stimulus and its mirror image are 90 degrees apart. Presenting the same spiral during the test period shows adaptation of both local motion detectors and global rotation detectors, whereas showing the mirror-spiral stimulates another set of local motion detectors, and therefore illustrates adaptation at only the global motion level. To manipulate the attentional state of observers, a secondary task was presented during the adaptation phase and observers either performed the task or ignored it. Motion aftereffect (MAE) duration was measured afterwards. While the effects of attention and test stimulus type on MAE duration were both significant, the difference in the MAE strength between the attention-distracted and attention-not-distracted conditions was equal when the test stimulus was the same-spiral or the mirror-spiral, suggesting that attention to spiral motion modulates only global rotation units and does not affect local motion detectors located at V1. Our results are in accord with those reported by Watanabe et al. [Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 1998, 95(19), 11489-11492] which showed differential modulation of motion processing areas depending on the type of motion being attended. Therefore our data are supportive of the notion that attentional modulation of V1 is highly task-dependent.

Processing of temporal information is critical to behaviour. Here, we review the phenomenology and mechanism of relative timing , ordinal comparisons between the timing of occurrence of events. Relative timing can be an implicit component of particular brain computations or can be an explicit, conscious judgement. Psychophysical measurements of explicit relative timing have revealed clues about the interaction of sensory signals in the brain as well as in the influence of internal states, such as attention, on those interactions. Evidence from human neurophysiological and functional imaging studies, neuropsychological examination in brain-lesioned patients, and temporary disruptive interventions such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), point to a role of the parietal cortex in relative timing. Relative timing has traditionally been modelled as a ‘race’ between competing neural signals. We propose an updated race process based on the integration of sensory evidence towards a decision threshold rather than simple signal propagation . The model suggests a general approach for identifying brain regions involved in relative timing, based on looking for trial-by-trial correlations between neural activity and temporal order judgements (TOJs). Finally, we show how the paradigm can be used to reveal signals related to TOJs in parietal cortex of monkeys trained in a TOJ task.