The epidemiology of varicella in Italy is consistent with that found in previous studies in industrialized countries. Severe complications did not occur in our population. We believe that the health arguments in favor of universal vaccination of children > 18 months of age do not differ in our own country from those of other industrialized nations. Our data could now be incorporated into pharmacoeconomic models to establish cost-efficient strategies for Italy.
Type 2 diabetes has a high cost to society. The major cost component is due to the care of diabetic complications, not to the treatment of the illness itself; in particular, drug costs represent a relatively small proportion of such treatment cost.
Inodilators are the first-choice class of drugs for the treatment of acute heart failure (AHF). Levosimendan is a relatively recent inodilatory agent, presenting superior outcomes in comparison with traditional inotropes. An economic evaluation of levosimendan for the treatment of AHF in Italy was performed. In a retrospective study conducted on patients with AHF admitted to a teaching hospital in Rome, two groups were derived from an observational registry: 147 patients treated with levosimendan and 145 treated with dobutamine. Follow-up was at 1 year after treatment. In the reference study looked at in this paper, treatment with levosimendan reduced mean length of stay (LOS) by 1.5 days (P < 0.05). Reduction in the rehospitalization rate was 6.7% (P < 0.05). Mortality rate at 1 month was reduced by 4.8% (P < 0.05). Based on the reference study, a cost analysis from the hospital perspective was carried out. The incremental cost of treatment with levosimendan (a,not sign697) was equivalent to the incremental savings (a,not sign694), the latter being obtained from the reduction in LOS (a,not sign508) and rehospitalization rate (a,not sign186). Despite the limitations of this study, and even neglecting all nonmonetary health gains as additional outcomes, levosimendan appears to be a competitive alternative compared with dobutamine for the treatment of AHF in the Italian hospital setting
In total, 5889 cases of hepatitis A virus infection were reported during an outbreak in Puglia, a region of Southern Italy, in 1996. The primary cause of the outbreak was consumption of contaminated food (raw shellfish, vegetables, etc.), with a contributory risk factor of person-to-person transmission. A detailed questionnaire was completed by 250 randomly selected patients to obtain information sufficient to calculate the direct and indirect costs of the outbreak for the individual patient, the National Health Service (NHS) and society as a whole. A conversion rate of $US1 = 1530 Italian lire (L) has been used throughout the study since this was the average exchange rate in 1996. For the individual patient with hepatitis A virus infection, the mean cost was L1.013 million ($US662), which was equivalent to 6.6% of the mean annual income of the employed patients. The total cost of the outbreak to the NHS was L23.98 billion ($US15.67 million), which was equivalent to 0.4% of the total public health expenditure in the region in 1996. The total cost of the outbreak to society (individual patient, NHS and third parties combined) was L37.406 billion ($US24.45 million), corresponding to 0.04% of the gross domestic product of the entire region in 1996, with a mean cost per patient of L6.35 million ($US4150) from a societal perspective. The majority of patients (86.3%) were 11 to 30 years of age, reflecting the increasing susceptibility of younger patients to hepatitis A virus infection in recent decades. These economic and demographic data provide important information for the evaluation of preventive strategies including public education, sanitation and immunisation, so as to optimise the use of local health resources.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.