No abstract

The effects of three doses of lorazepam (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mg PO) on various aspects of memory, attention and sedation are described. Lorazepam produced dose-related deficits in verbal secondary memory, choice reaction time and a novel vigilance task. It also produced a dose-dependent increase in subjective sedation, and an enhancement of visual contrast sensitivity. These results are compared with those reported earlier using the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine, and discussed in relation to models of Alzheimer's disease.

In this study we examined the effects of lorazepam (2.0 mg PO) plus either placebo or one of three doses of the benzodiazepine antagonist Ro 15-1788 (0.3 mg, 1.0 mg or 3.0 mg IV) on measures of memory, attention and sedation. We found that lorazepam impaired verbal secondary memory performance, but also produced subjective and objective sedation; it increased reaction time, reduced critical flicker fusion thresholds and caused subjects to make more errors on a sustained attention task and rate themselves as drowsy. Ro 15-1788 dose dependently blocked the deficit in secondary memory produced by lorazepam, but also showed monotonic dose-related antagonism of its effects on indices of sedation (with the exception of the critical flicker fusion deficit, which was unaffected). These results demonstrate that lorazepam-induced cognitive deficits can be blocked by a benzodiazepine receptor antagonist. They also suggest that the memory deficits produced in this pharmacological model of organic amnesia are not readily dissociated from deficits in attention.

Administration of the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine has been proposed as a pharmacological model for Alzheimer's disease. We have attempted to characterize the cognitive deficits produced by the administration of scopolamine (0.2 and 0.4 mg intra muscularly) to normal volunteers. We have also demonstrated reversal of these deficits by the cholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine (1.2 mg intramuscularly). Physostigmine also elevated subjects' plasma ACTH levels, a marker of central cholinergic activity. In the cognitive study, we found that scopolamine impaired subjects' performance on verbal learning, spatial learning and choice reaction time. These changes were associated with subjective sedation as measured by analogue rating scales. Physostigmine attenuated the impairment in verbal learning and reduced subjective sedation. In the biochemical study we examined the effects of the same drug regimes on plasma ACTH levels. Physostigmine administered with a peripherally active cholinergic antagonist (glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg intramuscularly) produced a rise in ACTH level which reached a peak 30 min after drug administration. Such a rise was not apparent when the physostigmine was coadministered with scopolamine. These results suggest that cognitive and neuroendocrine indices of central cholinergic activity such as these may be useful in determining the effectiveness of potential new therapeutic agents for Alzheimer's disease.

No abstract