Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Lawson Health Research Institute.

Background Due to the increasing public acceptance of substance use, it is important to understand the association between substance use and access to kidney transplant and its outcomes. Here, we assess the sociodemographic predictors of substance use and the association between substance use and KT access. Methods Predictors of substance use were examined using a multivariable‐adjusted multinomial logistic regression. The association between current substance use (tobacco and drug) and time from referral to listing or receipt of a KT was examined using Cox proportional hazards models. Results Of 2346 patients, the prevalence of current substance use was 17%. Predictors of current tobacco use were younger age, male sex, Caucasian ethnicity, being unemployed, and unmarried. Predictors of current drug use were younger age, male sex, Caucasian ethnicity, a history of non‐adherence, and a history of mental health disorder. Patients with tobacco use had a decreased likelihood of being cleared for KT (hazard ratio [HR]:0.83[0.70, 0.99]) and receiving a KT (HR:0.80 [0.66, 0.96]). No association was seen in this sample for patients with drug use (HR:0.88 [0.69, 1.11] for being cleared for KT and 0.88 [0.69, 1.14] for KT, respectively). Conclusions Tobacco use was associated with a decreased likelihood of access to KT whereas there was no statistically significant difference in access to KT between patients with or without drug use.

Background:Deceased donor kidney allocation in the United States is guided by the Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI). The generalizability of the KDRI beyond the United States has not been widely studied.Objective:To assess the generalizability of the KDRI in a cohort of non-US (Canadian) deceased donor kidney transplant recipients.Design:Population-based retrospective cohort study.Setting:Ontario, Canada.Patients:Recipients of deceased donor kidneys from January 1, 2005, to March 31, 2011.Methods:Using administrative data, we analyzed a cohort of deceased donor kidney recipients in Ontario, Canada. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the relationship between KDRI and the outcomes of graft loss and death. KDRI was modeled continuously and categorically. The ability of models with KDRI to predict recipient outcomes beyond donor age was also explored. Model discrimination was assessed using c-statistics, evaluated at 5 years of follow-up.Results:A total of 1299 consecutive deceased donor kidney transplant recipients were included. The median follow-up was 5.5 years. Mean donor age increased from 27 to 64 years across ascending KDRI quintiles. The adjusted relative hazards (95% confidence interval) for total graft loss from Q2 to Q5 (referent = Q1) were 1.27 (0.89-1.80), 1.58 (1.13-2.22), 1.43 (1.01-2.02), and 2.15 (1.54-2.99), respectively. Increased relative hazards across KDRI quintiles were also observed for death-censored graft loss, but not death with graft function. All-cause mortality was increased for the highest KDRI quintile only. In this cohort, a model with KDRI performed better than a model with donor age alone (P = .009).Limitations:Large health care databases may have precluded the complete capture of covariate data.Conclusions:In conclusion, the KDRI is generalizable to Canadian patients in Ontario and may help inform risk assessment beyond donor age. The performance of KDRI in other non-US settings, and the need for additional model refinement, warrants further study.

Objectives: To examine the practice patterns and perceptions of primary care physicians in the management of chronic diseases in kidney recipients, assess care provided to recipients, and identify barriers to the optimal delivery of primary care to recipients. Methods: A self-administered questionnaire on the primary care of kidney recipients was developed and implemented. The survey investigated physician comfort and practice patterns in providing preventive and chronic care to recipients, patient self-management support, and physician perceptions on communication with transplant centers and barriers to ideal care. Results: A total of 210 physicians completed the survey (response rate of 22%). Among the respondents, 73% indicated they were currently providing care to kidney recipients. The majority of physicians specified that they rarely (57%) or never (20%) communicate with transplant centers. Most physicians felt comfortable providing care to recipients for non-transplant-related issues (92.5%), vaccinations (85%), and periodic health examinations (94%). The majority (75.3%) of physicians felt uncomfortable managing the immunosuppressive medications of recipients. Physicians’ most commonly stated barriers to delivering optimal care to recipients were insufficient guidelines provided by the transplant center (68.9%) and lack of knowledge in managing recipients (58.8%). Suggested resources by physicians to improve their comfort level in managing recipients included guidelines and continuing medical educational activities related to transplantation. Conclusions: Our results suggest that there are barriers to delivering optimal primary care to kidney recipients. The approach to providing resources needed to bridge the knowledge gap for physicians in the management of recipients requires further exploration.