1. Intracellular recording from medial gastrocnemius (MG) motoneurones was used to examine postsynaptic potentials produced by electrical stimulation of the plantaris nerve at group I strength at rest and during fictive locomotion.
We tested the hypothesis that stimulation of the mesencephalic locomotor region (MLR) activates polysynaptic pathways that project to lumbar spinal motoneurons and are involved in the initiation of locomotion. Fictive locomotion was produced by MLR stimulation, and intracellular records of evoked postsynaptic potentials (PSPs) in alpha-motoneurons were computer analyzed. Stimulation of sites in the MLR that were maximally effective for the initiation of locomotion produced excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs and IPSPs) in all the motoneurons examined. The amplitudes of the PSPs increased as locomotion commenced. The EPSPs were largest during the depolarized phase of the step cycle, and in 17 of our 22 cells the EPSP was replaced by an IPSP of slightly longer latency during the hyperpolarized phase. The mean latency of the EPSPs measured from the stimulus artifact produced by stimulation of the MLR was 5.1 ms (3.0-7.0 ms). In all cases, the IPSP occurred 0.6 ms or more after the onset of the EPSP in the same cell. Later PSPs were sometimes observed as well. The effects of constant current injection on the membrane potential oscillations associated with fictive locomotion (locomotor drive potentials) were examined. The results showed that the amplitudes of the locomotor drive potentials (LDPs) could be affected by depolarizing and hyperpolarizing current injection. The data is consistent with the LDP having a predominant inhibitory component, which is more readily altered by current injection than is the excitatory component. The effect of constant current injections on the MLR-evoked PSPs was also examined, and it was observed that both EPSPs and IPSPs could be affected by the injected currents. The EPSPs increased in amplitude with constant hyperpolarizing current injection, and this fact rules out the possibility that the EPSP is actually a reversed IPSP. The IPSP was decreased in amplitude by hyperpolarizing current injection. Combined stimulation of the MLR and the ipsilateral high-threshold muscle or cutaneous afferents produced facilitation of both short- and long-latency MLR-evoked PSPs, suggesting that the two pathways share common interneurons. The possibility that the long-latency PSPs are produced by rapid oscillation in the locomotor central pattern generator is discussed. We concluded that MLR stimulation that evokes fictive locomotion produces both excitation and inhibition of spinal motoneurons. Spinal interneuronal systems are implicated and may be those involved in the initiation and control of locomotion. The probable relay sites for the descending pathway from the MLR to motoneurons are discussed.
Extracellular recordings from interneurons located in the L4 spinal segment were made during fictive locomotion produced by electrical stimulation of the mesencephalic locomotor region (MLR) in the paralysed decerebrate cat. Only interneurons within the L4 segment which received group II input from quadriceps, sartorius or the pretibial flexor muscle afferents and which had axonal projections to motor nuclei in L7 were selected for analysis. During the fictive step cycle two thirds of these interneurons fired action potentials during the time of activity in the ipsilateral hindlimb flexor neurograms. These cells were also less responsive to peripheral input during the extension phase of the fictive locomotion cycle. The remaining one third of the interneurons examined were not rhythmically active during locomotion. The possible contributions of the midlumbar interneurons to motoneuron activity during locomotion are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.