Carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) is an important option for climate change mitigation and it has been extensively analysed in recent years to face the climate challenge.A portion of the emitted CO 2 comes from fossil fuel power plants. Several post-combustion technologies are available for separating CO 2 from the flue gases produced by the combustion of fossil fuels. In recent years, low-temperature/cryogenic technologies (e.g., CO 2 capture by anti-sublimation) have been investigated for this purpose, which rely on the fact that CO 2 can be separated out of flue gas by freezing it out. As a consequence, when dealing with the design of this type of processes, it is of paramount importance to be able to satisfactorily predict the thermodynamic phase behaviour of the system of interest, which involves equilibrium conditions also in the presence of solid CO 2 .The classical approach for phase equilibria calculations involving a solid phase is based on the equality of components' fugacities in the different phases and on the use of an expression for the fugacity of the freezing component in the solid phase that can be derived by relating it to its fugacity in the vapor phase following a proper thermodynamic cycle. This work compares the predictions for solid-vapor equilibria (SVE) conditions of a flue gas mixture that are obtained using such a classical approach with those obtained using the RGibbs calculation block available in Aspen Plus ® process simulator. The latter one enables SVE calculations by minimizing the Gibbs energy. The obtained results are useful for determining suitable operating conditions for the separation process, depending on the desired level of CO 2 recovery to be achieved.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.