Abstract. The design of future spacecraft such as the Crew Exploration Vehicle must take into account the radiation shielding properties of both the structural components as well as dedicated shielding materials. Since modest depths of shielding stop the vast majority of Solar Energetic Particles (SEP), the greater challenge is posed by the need to shield crew from the Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCR), which include highly-charged and highly-energetic particles. Here, we report on results from tests performed with beams of 1 GeV/nuc 56 Fe at the Brookhaven National Laboratory. A wide variety of targets, both elemental and composite, were placed in the particle beams, and the spectra of particles emerging from the targets were measured using a stack of silicon detectors. Results are presented primarily in terms of dose reduction per g cm -2 of target material, and support the conclusions of an earlier calculation by Wilson et al. showing that performance improves as the shield's mass number decreases, with hydrogen being by far the most effective. The data also show that, as depth increases, the incremental benefit of adding shielding decreases, particularly for aluminum and other elements with higher atomic mass numbers.
Charge-changing and fragment production cross sections at 0• have been obtained for interactions of 290 MeV/nucleon and 400 MeV/nucleon carbon beams with C, CH2, Al, Cu, Sn, and Pb targets. These beams are relevant to cancer therapy, space radiation, and the production of radioactive beams. We compare to previously published results using C and CH2 targets at similar beam energies. Due to ambiguities arising from the presence of multiple fragments on many events, previous publications have reported only cross sections for B and Be fragments. In this work we have extracted cross sections for all fragment species, using data obtained at three distinct values of angular acceptance, supplemented by data taken with the detector stack placed off the beam axis. A simulation of the experiment with the PHITS Monte Carlo code shows fair agreement with the data obtained with the large acceptance detectors, but agreement is poor at small acceptance. The measured cross sections are also compared to the predictions of the one-dimensional cross section models EPAX2 and NUCFRG2; the latter is presently used in NASA's space radiation transport calculations. Though PHITS and NUCFRG2 reproduce the charge-changing cross sections with reasonable accuracy, none of the models is able to accurately predict the fragment cross sections for all fragment species and target materials.
Radiation risk management for human space missions depends on accurate modeling of highenergy heavy ion transport in matter. The process of nuclear fragmentation can play a key role in reducing both the physical dose and the biological effectiveness of the radiation encountered in deep space. Hydrogenous materials and light elements are expected to be more effective shields against the deleterious effects of Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCR) than aluminum, which is used in current spacecraft hulls. NASA has chosen polyethylene, CH 2 , as the reference material for accelerator-based radiation testing of multi-function composites that are currently being developed. A detailed discussion of the shielding properties of polyethylene under a variety of relevant experimental conditions is presented, along with Monte Carlo simulations of the experiments and other Monte Carlo calculations in which the entire GCR flux is simulated. The Monte Carlo results are compared to the accelerator data and we assess the usefulness of 1 GeV/amu 56 Fe as a proxy for GCR heavy ions. We conclude that additional accelerator-based measurements with higher beam energies would be useful.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.