The goal of this article is to contribute to the discussion of the efficiency of lattice-Boltzmann (LB) methods as CFD solvers. After a short review of the basic model and extensions, we compare the accuracy and computational efficiency of two research simulation codes based on the LB and the finite-element method (FEM) for two-dimensional incompressible laminar flow problems with complex geometries. We also study the influence of the Mach number on the solution, since LB methods are weakly compressible by nature, by comparing compressible and incompressible results obtained from the LB code and the commercial code CFX. Our results indicate, that for the quantities studied (lift, drag, pressure drop) our LB prototype is competitive for incompressible transient problems, but asymptotically slower for steady-state Stokes flow because the asymptotic algorithmic complexity of the classical LB-method is not optimal compared to the multigrid solvers incorporated in the FEM and CFX code. For the weakly compressible case, the LB approach has a significant wall clock time advantage as compared to CFX. In addition, we demonstrate that the influence of the finite Mach number in LB simulations of incompressible flow is easily underestimated.
A lattice Boltzmann model for incompressible axisymmetric flow is proposed in this paper. Unlike previous axisymmetric lattice Boltzmann models, which were based on "primitive-variables" Navier-Stokes equations, the target macroscopic equations of the present model are vorticity-stream-function formulations. Due to the intrinsic features of vorticity-stream-function formulations, the present model is more efficient, more stable, and much simpler than the existing models. The advantages of the present model are validated by numerical experiments.
SUMMARYOver the last decade the Lattice Boltzmann method, which was derived from the kinetic gas theory, has matured as an efficient approach for solving Navier-Stokes equations. The p-FEM approach has proved to be highly efficient for a variety of problems in the field of structural mechanics. Our goal is to investigate the validity and efficiency of coupling the two approaches to simulate transient bidirectional Fluid-Structure interaction problems with geometrically non-linear structural deflections. A benchmark configuration of self-induced large oscillations for a flag attached to a cylinder can be accurately and efficiently reproduced within this setting. We describe in detail the force evaluation techniques, displacement transfers and the algorithm used to couple these completely different solvers as well as the results, and compare them with a benchmark reference solution computed by a monolithic finite element approach.
In this contribution a numerical study of a turbulent jet flow is presented. The simulation results of two different variants of the Lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) are compared. The first is the well-established D3Q19 MRT model extended by a Smagorinsky Large Eddy Simulation (LES) model. The second is the D3Q27 Factorized Cascaded Lattice Boltzmann (FCLB) model without any additional explicit turbulence model. For this model no studies of turbulent flow with high resolution on nonuniform grids existed so far. The underlying computational procedure uses a time nested refinement technique and a grid with more than a billion DOF. The simulations were conducted with the parallel multi physics solver VIRTUALFLUIDS. It is shown that both models are feasible for the present flow case, but the FCLB outperforms the traditional approach in some aspects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.