MicroRNAs contribute to the maintenance of optimal cellular functions by fine‐tuning protein expression levels. In the pancreatic β‐cells, imbalances in the exocytotic machinery components lead to impaired insulin secretion and type 2 diabetes (T2D). We hypothesize that dysregulated miRNA expression exacerbates β‐cell dysfunction, and have earlier shown that islets from the diabetic GK‐rat model have increased expression of miRNAs, including miR‐335‐5p (miR‐335). Here, we aim to determine the specific role of miR‐335 during development of T2D, and the influence of this miRNA on glucose‐stimulated insulin secretion and Ca2+‐dependent exocytosis. We found that the expression of miR‐335 negatively correlated with secretion index in human islets of individuals with prediabetes. Overexpression of miR‐335 in human EndoC‐βH1 and in rat INS‐1 832/13 cells (OE335) resulted in decreased glucose‐stimulated insulin secretion, and OE335 cells showed concomitant reduction in three exocytotic proteins: SNAP25, Syntaxin‐binding protein 1 (STXBP1), and synaptotagmin 11 (SYT11). Single‐cell capacitance measurements, complemented with TIRF microscopy of the granule marker NPY‐mEGFP demonstrated a significant reduction in exocytosis in OE335 cells. The reduction was not associated with defective docking or decreased Ca2+ current. More likely, it is a direct consequence of impaired priming of already docked granules. Earlier reports have proposed reduced granular priming as the cause of reduced first‐phase insulin secretion during prediabetes. Here, we show a specific role of miR‐335 in regulating insulin secretion during this transition period. Moreover, we can conclude that miR‐335 has the capacity to modulate insulin secretion and Ca2+‐dependent exocytosis through effects on granular priming.
An investigation of the relationship between the polarized state of the membrane and the onset and the intensity of pinocytosis was made in Amoeba proteus. Membrane potential and input resistance was in all instances found to decrease in approximate proportion to the number of channels when pinocytosis was induced by a variety of alkali metal ions at varying pH. Channels began to appear when the membrane was depolarized to -30 mV by the inducer of pinocytosis. With all inducers the maximum pinocytosis was encountered at membrane potentials close to zero. No positive potentials were recorded when the chloride salts of the inducing cations were used. At high concentrations of alkali ions a transient increase of the chloride permeability caused short-lasting hyperolarizations of the membrane. Inhibition of pinocytosis by Ca++ was accompanied by an increase of input resistance and membrane potential. The selectivity of the membrane to different alkali metal ions observed as changes in pinocytosis intensity, membrane potential and input resistance was found to vary with the concentration of the inducer and with the Ca++ concentration of the extracellular solution. Displacement of membrane bound Ca++ appeared to decrease the field strength of charged groups in the membrane altering its selectivity among alkali cations. The formation of pinocytotic channels is suggested to require translocation of Ca++ from the membrane into the cell and would therefore be closely related to the electrical properties of the amoeba.
The effect of membrane stabilizing drugs on cation induced pinocytosis was studied in Amoeba proteus. Initially the presence of local anesthetic drugs during a pinocytosis cycle had a stimulating effect on channel formation, however, the capacity to develop pinocytotic channels was reversibly inhibited after a period of treatment with these drugs. Imipramine, vinblastine and the phenothiazines had effects similar to local anaesthetics. The local anesthetics inhibited pinocytosis in the following order: dibucaine greater than tetracaine greater than bupivacaine greater than lidocaine greater than procaine, and the phenothiazines: thioridazine greater than prochlorperazine greater chlorpromazine greater than prometazine. Pinocytosis, when induced by Na+ or tris, was more affected by the drugs and by calcium binding agents than pinocytosis induced by K+. After pretreatment with inhibitory concentration of dibucaine (3 x 10(-4) M) the depolarization of the membrane and the conductance increase during pinocytosis were normal, while the increase of oxygen uptake during the pincoytosis cycle was abolished. Addition of Ca++ before, during or after dibucaine treatment decreased the effect of the drug. Conversely, in dibucaine-treated cells, cation induced pinocytosis was less inhibited by Ca++ than pinocytosis in normal cells. Addition of EGTA to the inducing solutions potentiated the inhibitory effect of the drug. It is suggested that these drugs release Ca++ from the cell surface and at higher concentration or after prolonged incubation time interfere with a Ca++ mechanism which couples the membrane and contractile systems in the cytoplasm.
Ultraviolet (UV) irradiation (4 000-10 000 erg X mm(-2) decreased membrane potential and input resistance of Amoeba proteus and induced formation of pinocytotic channels. Submaximal pinocytosis induced by UV light was additive to pinocytosis induced by K+ or Na+ and stimulated in the presence of EGTA. It was not inhibited by the presence of La+++ or by pretreatment with dibucaine. In these respects and with respect to optimum pH and pCa, UV induced pinocytosis. Accumulation of K+ in the amoeba membrane after a dose of radiation may explain the similarity between pinocytosis induced by UV light and potassium salts. Ca++ present during the period of irradiation inhibited the effect of UV light. Instead Ca++ applied after irradiation (1-20 mM) increased channel formation. This effect was stimulated the presence of local anesthetic drugs. It is suggested that high doses of UV light may induce channel formation by releasing Ca++ from the cell membrane into the cell (UV induced pinocytosis). Ca++ may be released at the moment of absorption of UV light in the membrane as well as during the period of depolarization which follows irradiation. Low doses of UV light may permit extracellular Ca++ to enter the cell and stimulate channel formation (calcium induced pinocytosis). Dithiotreitol (1 mM) applied after irradiation depressed both UV and calcium induced pinocytosis so these may be the result of the same structural change which involves the formation of disulphide bonds in the membrane.
Lanthanum chloride (greater than or equal to 10(-5) M) induced pinocytosis in normal and at greater than or equal to 10(-4) M in Ca++-deficient amoeba. With respect to the Ca++-requirement of the pinocytotic response low and high concentrations of La+++ had effects like Na+ and K+, respectively. The concentration of La+++ stimulated or inhibited other types of pinocytosis. Thus all concentrations of La+++ inhibited sodium induced pinocytosis while high concentrations (greater than 10(-3) M) stimulated and low concentrations diminished potassium induced pinocytosis. Only the latter effect required the presence of Ca++. In the presence of La+++ other inducers acted either like K+ or Na+. Inducers may cause channel formation by opening a pore for Ca++ in the plasma membrane, Na+ like inducers being less effective than K+-like inducers, and by releasing Ca++ into the cytoplasm from the glycocalyx (Na+-like inducers) or from the entire cell membrane (K+-like inducers). La+++ may diminish the effect of Na+-like inducers and vice versa by direct competition for sites in the glycocalyx and the effect of a K+-like inducer by redistribution of Ca++ in the cell surface. At high concentrations or in the presence of a K+-like inducer La+++ may enter the Ca++ pore, release Ca++ from the interior of the membrane and so induce or stimulate pinocytosis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.