BackgroundTransposon-mediated, non-viral gene delivery is a powerful tool for generating stable cell lines and transgenic animals. However, as multi-copy insertion is the preferred integration pattern, there is the potential for uncontrolled changes in endogenous gene expression and detrimental effects in cells or animals. Our group has previously reported on the generation of several transgenic cattle by using microinjection of the Sleeping Beauty (SB) and PiggyBac (PB) transposons and seeks to explore the long-term effects of this technology on cattle.ResultsTransgenic cattle, one female (SNU-SB-1) and one male (SNU-PB-1), reached over 36 months of age with no significant health issues and normal blood parameters. The detection of transgene integration and fluorescent signal in oocytes and sperm suggested the capacity for germline transmission in both of the founder animals. After natural breeding, the founder transgenic cow delivered a male calf and secreted milk containing fluorescent transgenic proteins. The calf expressed green fluorescent protein in primary cells from ear skin, with no significant change in overall genomic stability and blood parameters. Three sites of transgene integration were identified by next-generation sequencing of the calf’s genome.ConclusionsOverall, these data demonstrate that transposon-mediated transgenesis can be applied to cattle without being detrimental to their long-term genomic stability or general health. We further suggest that this technology may be usefully applied in other fields, such as the generation of transgenic animal models.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-018-4760-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The CRISPR/Cas9 system has proved to be a powerful tool for knockout and knock-in in various species. When 2 components—Cas9 and single guide (sg)RNA—are delivered into cells or embryos, the events of gene editing occur. Because Cas9 is essential for gene editing in the CRISPR/Cas9 system, some studies have reported the production of Cas9-expressing animals, such as mice, which could be used to increase gene editing efficiency in subsequent experiments. In previous reports, we successfully produced 4 Cas9-expressing cattle via microinjection (Hahn et al. 2016 Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 29, 211). Primary cells from these calves had Cas9 activity because transfection of only sgRNA resulted in gene deletion. The aim of this study was to analyse the blood of the transgenic cattle to investigate the effect of Cas9 expression on health. Two of 4 transgenic calves died; one had severe ruminant tympany, failed to respond to treatment, and died at 4 months of age, and the other died at 5 months of age due to accidental ingestion of a needle from a feed bunk. Blood samples were obtained from the surviving 2 transgenic cattle (1 male and 1 female) at 7 and 12 months for blood analysis. Five milliliters of whole blood samples was collected from the jugular vein. Portions were used for CBC (Hemavet 950, Drew Scientific, Miami Lakes, FL, USA) and for serum chemistry analysis (BS-400, Mindray, Shenzhen, China). Average values for white blood cells (9600 and 1057/mm3), neutrophils (4590 and 3870/mm3), lymphocytes (4020 and 5910/mm3), red blood cells (732,000 and 798,000/mm3), hemoglobin (9.5 and 10.2 g dL−1), packed cell volume (24.3 and 25.3%), platelet (439,000 and 327,500/mm3), AST (76 and 104 IU), ALP (140 and 133 IU), BUN (7.5 and 10.5 mg dL−1), and creatinine (1.3 and 1.0 mg dL−1) of male and female transgenic calves were within the reference range. Additionally, there was no difference in general health information, including body temperature and feeding. In conclusion, we demonstrated that continuous Cas9 expression in transgenic cattle did not affect health status of the surviving calves in terms of blood analysis. They have grown up without any health issues and are currently 14 (female) and 15 (male) months old. In the near future, we will evaluate their germline transmission by natural breeding or in vitro fertilization. This work was supported by BK21 PLUS Program for Creative Veterinary Science, NRF (NRF-2017R1A2B3004972), and Seoul Milk Coop (SNU 550–20160004).
A genome-editing technology, CRISPR/Cas9 system is proved to be a powerful tool for knockout and knock-in in various species. When 2 components [Cas9 and single guide (sg) RNA] are delivered into cells or embryos, the events of gene editing occur. Because Cas9 is essential for every gene editing based on the CRISPR/Cas9 system, some studies reported that efficiency of gene editing would be increased as Cas9 was integrated into cells or animals. Accordingly, if the Cas9-expressing cattle is born, it would be broadly used for gene editing in cattle. For this study, the Cas9 and RFP genes were cloned into the PiggyBac transposon system. PiggyBac-Cas9-RFP and transposase were microinjected into 1436 IVF embryos and 241 blastocysts were formed. Blastocysts with RFP expression accounted for 14.1% of total formed blastocysts. Five blastocysts were selected and transferred into 5 recipient cow (1 embryo per recipient). After gestation periods, 4 transgenic cattle were delivered without any veterinary assistance. From transgenic cattle, ear skin tissue was collected for primary culture. On those primary cells, sgRNA in DNA form for various genes such as PRNP, RB1, and BLG were transfected with 2 μg of sgRNA per 5 × 105 cells using electroporation. As expected, every group of each sgRNA delivered was confirmed to be mutated by T7E1 assay. The data demonstrated that, for the first time, transgenic cattle with Cas9 expression were born, grown up to date (age = 5 months) and will be a valuable resource for genome editing in cattle. This work was supported by BK21 PLUS Program for Creative Veterinary Science and Seoul Milk Coop (SNU 550–20160004).
Recently, we published on the efficient production of transgenic cattle using the DNA transposon system (Yum et al. 2016 Sci. Rep. 6, 27185). In that study, 8 transgenic cattle were born following transposon-mediated gene delivery system (Sleeping Beauty and Piggybac transposon) via microinjection of zygotes. In the analysis of their genomic stability using next-generation sequencing, there was no significant difference in the number of genomic variants between transgenic and nontransgenic cattle. In this study, we have described current status of those transgenic cattle in term of health, germ-line transmission, and application. All the transgenic cattle have grown up to date (the oldest being 30 months old, the youngest being 12 months old) without any health issue. In general blood analysis, there were not any significant changes between transgenic cattle and wild type. Because the transgene (green fluorescent protein; GFP) expression is constitutively active and has strong expression, it could be visualised without fluorescence equipment. One of transgenic male cattle reached puberty and semen was collected. Over 200 frozen semen straws were produced and some were used for IVF. In every IVF replication, around 80% blastocysts expressed the GFP. Over 36 GFP blastocysts were frozen for embryo transfer in the future, and we are planning to crossbreed for generating homozygotic transgenic cattle. Another application is to use the GFP locus to gene-edit the transgenic cattle, as long-term expression of transgene did not affect their health. In 1 cell stage, embryos produced using GFP frozen-thawed semen, single guide RNA for GFP, Cas9, together with donor DNA that included RFP and homology arms to link the double-strand break of single guide RNA target site, were co-injected and RFP was observed. Knockout/-in for editing GFP locus using CRISPR-Cas9 might be a valuable approach for the next generation of transgenic models by microinjection. In conclusion, we demonstrated that transgenic cattle via transposon are healthy to date and germ-line competence was confirmed. The GFP locus will be used as the target region for future gene engineering via genome-editing technology. Finally, all those animals could be a valuable agricultural and veterinary science resource for studying the effects of gene manipulation on disease resistance and food production. This work was supported by BK21 PLUS Program for Creative Veterinary Science and Seoul Milk Coop (SNU 550–20160004).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.