BackgroundAntiangioagenic drugs, ranibizumab, bevacizumab and the most recent one marketed, aflibercept, are the elected treatments of age related macular degeneration (AMD). These treatments are a heavy economic burden because of the growing number of patients diagnosed with AMD.PurposeTo describe the process of developing 2 mg/0.05 mL sterile intravitreal aflibercept syringes to treat AMD refractory to bevacizumab and/or ranibizumab.To assess the savings brought about by the implementation of this process.Material and methodsThe pharmacy department prepares 2 mg/0.05 mL sterile intravitreal aflibercept syringes from 4 mg/0.1 mL aflibercept commercial vials in a horizontal laminar flow hood. The entire vial content is charged in a 2.5 mL sterile syringe, with an integrated filter needle. With a 1 mL sterile syringe (with 0.33 mm (29 G) needle incorporated and without free space) the necessary dose is loaded, absorbing aflibercept solution by the tip of the 2.5 mL syringe and without touching the needle on any surface to avoid damaging the bezel. The ready to use syringe must be perfectly flush and without bubbles. This was a retrospective study, from February 2015 to September 2015. Farmatools software was used to record the number of patients diagnosed with AMD refractory to bevacizumab and/or ranibizumab treated with aflibercept, and the cost of the dispensed aflibercept vials and syringes. Direct costs between the use of aflibercept syringes instead of vials was compared in order to calculate the savings per dose and the total savings.ResultsThree ready to use aflibercept syringes are obtained from one commercial vial. A small volume of aflibercept remains in it, but not enough to prepare another syringe.During the study period, 60 aflibercept syringes were prepared from 18 vials to treat 25 patients. Each syringe cost 191.17€; this meant a total cost of 11 470.20€. Each vial cost 644.54€. If the corresponding number of vials had been used, total cost would have been 38 672.40€. The savings per dose and total were 453.37€ and 27 202.20€, respectively.ConclusionPreparation of ready to use aflibercept syringes provides greater accuracy and safety for the treatment of AMD refractory to bevacizumab and/or ranibizumab.Cost savings are achieved with the optimisation of aflibercept commercial vials. The savings would be greater if more vials were optimised simultaneously, because the surplus could be used and more aflibercept syringes would be obtained.No conflict of interest.
Material and MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study carried out in a tertiary hospital. We included all AD patients treated with dupilumab with a minimum follow-up of 52 weeks.We collected the following data from electronic medical records: age, gender, previous treatments, eczema area and severity index (EASI) and dermatology life quality index (DLQI) at baseline and at 52 weeks of follow-up, adverse effects and treatment adherence (calculated by medication possession ratio [MPR]).Effectiveness was determined by the change in the EASI and DLQI values at 52 weeks compared to baseline. Safety endpoints were the number and type of adverse effects (AE) during the follow-up period. Results In total, 61 patients were included in the study. The mean age ( ± SD) was 40 ( ± 18) years. Thirty-five patients (57%) were men.As previous topical treatments, 100% of patients had received corticosteroids; whereas 49%, tacrolimus. Besides, 70% had underwent phototherapy. Regarding systemic treatment, 79% had received corticosteroids; 70%, cyclosporine; 25%, mycophenolate mofetil; 25%, azathioprine; and 28%, methotrexate.Mean ( ± SD) EASI and DLQI baseline values were 33 ± 11 and 19 ± 5, respectively. At 52 weeks follow-up, these indexes were 2 ± 3 and 4 ± 5, respectively. The reduction in EASI and DLQI was statistically significant (p<0.001). During this period, AE were reported in 22 patients (36%): conjunctivitis (20%), arthralgia (5%), herpes virus infection (5%) and paradoxical psoriasis (3%) were the most common ones. Three treatments were discontinued due to ineffectiveness, 4 due to AE and 2 because of clinical remission.The mean MPR ( ± SD) was 100 ± 14%, which demonstrates good rates of therapeutic adherence. No patient presented a MPR <75%, so we could not determine the impact of this variable on treatment effectiveness. Conclusion and RelevanceOur study shows that dupilumab is an effective and safe drug for moderate-to-severe DA. Our cohort experienced a statistically significant improvement in EASI and DLQI at 52 weeks of treatment. Additionally, therapeutic adherence was very high.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.