BackgroundTo identify differences between Ranibizumab and Aflibercept in treatment-naïve patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD) in a real-life clinical setting.MethodsWe compared two groups of patients with a fairly similar prognosis either receiving Aflibercept or Ranibizumab within a pro re nata regimen for 1 year. Changes in visual acuity (letters) and central foveal thickness (CFT) and frequency of injections after completing the loading phase were evaluated using two separate multivariate mixed linear models.ResultsWhen correcting for baseline differences between the Aflibercept (11 eyes) and Ranibizumab (16 eyes) group, there was neither divergence in visual acuity (−0.97 letters (95 % CI. −6.06-4.12); p = 0.709), nor a significant difference in the reduction of CFT (−25.16 μm, 95 % CI; (−78.01-27.68); p = 0.351) between the two groups 1 year after treatment initiation. Also, the number of injection did not differ (0.04 (95 % CI; −0.16-0.09); p = 0.565).ConclusionIn contrast to health claims, treatment-naïve nvAMD, Ranibizumab and Aflibercept were equivalent in terms of functional and morphologic outcomes and number of injections when studied in real-life clinical practice.

BackgroundLittle is known about the patterns of actual health care delivery of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in patients with age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, and retinal vein occlusion in Switzerland. The purpose of this study was to describe these treatment patterns, specifically comparing the numbers of anti-VEGF injections and associated expenditures between patients treated with ranibizumab and those treated with aflibercept in Switzerland using claims data.MethodsWe identified our study patients retrospectively using the Helsana claims database, which includes data on approximately 1.2 million subjects with basic health insurance. Patients qualified for inclusion if ranibizumab or aflibercept had been initiated between December 1, 2012 (when aflibercept was approved by the Federal Office of Public Health) and November 30, 2013. Within this set, patients with at least 12 months of continuous insurance enrolment in the previous year were considered. In univariate analyses, we examined the distribution of demographic data and patient characteristics between those receiving ranibizumab and those receiving aflibercept. Numbers of injections and associated health care expenditures observed during the 6-month follow-up period after incident treatment were the two outcomes considered. In multivariate regression analyses, controlling for possible confounding factors, we compared differences in these two outcomes between patients treated with ranibizumab and those treated with aflibercept.ResultsOf 3,260 patients who were on anti-VEGF treatment for an ophthalmological indication between December 1, 2012 and November 30, 2013, 1,150 qualified for inclusion. Age, geographic region, and number of physician visits in the previous year were significant factors in the number of injections given during the 6-month follow-up period. Frequency of injections and associated health care expenditures were similar between the groups when correcting for differences in patient characteristics.ConclusionContrary to the recommendations regarding frequency of injections and the results of clinical studies, aflibercept and ranibizumab are used in a similar fashion in Switzerland, resulting in similar total health care expenditures for both these anti-VEGF agents.

Purpose Anti-VEGF treatment has a potent vasoconstrictive effect. Early changes of retinal blood flow velocity (RBFV) measured using the Retinal Function Imager (RFI) combined with indicators of vascular status may help in predicting the visual outcome 1 month post injection in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD) under ranibizumab treatment. To develop a simple prediction model based on the change in RBFV 3 days post injection and indicators of a patient's vascular status to assess the probability of a successful visual outcome 1 month post injection.Methods RBFV measured using RFI were prospectively collected pre-injection and 3 days post injection in 18 eyes of 15 patients. Indicators of vascular status (history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus without retinal affection, and smoking) were assessed by medical history. By univariate analyses, parameters associated with visual outcome were weighted (−1 to 6 points). A multivariate logistic regression model with the categorized visual outcome parameter (≥0 letters gained after 1 month) as the dependent variate and the sum score as the independent variate (continuous scale) was used to estimate the score value-specific probabilities of letters gained ≥ 0 1 month post injection. Results The indicators of vascular status negatively influenced the likelihood of a letter gain ≥ 0 whereas an increase in the arterial RBFV strongly increased it. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for these parameters investigated was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.43-1.00). Conclusion Changes in the arterial RBFV following 3 days after ranibizumab injection combined with three indicators of the vascular status identified nvAMD patients with favorable visual outcome accurately.

No abstract