Interaction between rotating impeller and stationary diffuser in a centrifugal compressor is of practical importance in evaluating system performance. The present study aims at investigating how the interaction influences the unsteady diffuser performance and understanding the physical phenomena in the centrifugal compressor. A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method has been applied to predict the flow field in the compressor, which has a conventional vaned diffuser (VD) and a low solidity vaned diffuser (LSVD). The radial gaps between impeller and diffuser and different flow coefficients are varied. The results obtained show that the major parameter that influences the unsteady variation of diffuser performance is due to the circumferential variation of the flow angle at the diffuser vane leading edge. The physical phenomena behind the pressure recovery variation are identified as the unsteady vortex shedding and the associated energy losses. The vortex core region as well as the shedding of vortices from the diffuser vane are triggered by the variation in the diffuser vane loading, which in turn is influenced by the circumferential variation of the impeller wake region. There is little unsteady variation of flow angle in the span-wise direction. This indicates that the steady state performance characteristics are related to the span-wise variation of flow angle, while the unsteady characteristics are contributed by the circumferential variation of flow angle. At design conditions, dominant frequency components of pressure fluctuation are all periodic and at near stall, these are aperiodic.
A computational study has been conducted to analyse the performance of a centrifugal compressor with different types of diffusers under various levels of impeller—diffuser interactions. Vaneless (VLD), vaned (VD), low solidity vaned (LSVD), and partial vaned diffusers (PVD) are used for this purpose. The study is carried out using commercial software ANSYS CFX. The interaction level is varied by varying the radial gap between the impeller and diffuser by keeping the diffuser vane at three different radial locations. Numerical simulations have been conducted for four different flow coefficients. At design flow coefficient maximum efficiency occurs when the leading edge is at R3 (ratio of radius of the diffuser leading edge to the impeller tip radius) = 1.10 for all vane-type diffuser configurations. At below design flow coefficient higher stage efficiency occurs when the diffuser vanes are kept far away ( R3 = 1.15) and at above design flow coefficient R3 = 1.05 gives better efficiency. The highest diffuser pressure recovery coefficient ( Cp) is observed for VD at design flow coefficient. For VLD, the Cp value increases with flow coefficient. In the case of VD and LSVD configurations the exit flow from the impeller is disturbed when the diffuser vanes are closer, and these disturbances are more evident in the last 10 per cent of the impeller flow. In the case of the impeller with PVD the interaction effects are minimum.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.