No abstract

No abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate rectal pain and bowel function of the patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Methods: We divided 296 patients who underwent RARP into two groups depending on the intervention: NS (nerve-sparing) group (bilateral NS, unilateral NS and bilateral partial NS) and non-NS group (unilateral partial NS, bilateral non-NS). Bowel function was assessed using the Extended Prostate Cancer Index Composite for 24 months after RARP. Results: The bowel function score and rectal urgency at 1À 6 months after RARP were more significantly impaired in the non-NS group than in the NS group (p < 0.05). In a multivariate analysis of factors affecting the bowel function score at 6 months after RARP, only NS procedure had a significant effect. Conclusions: In the initial period after RARP, bowel symptoms were significantly impaired. This impairment was affected by the degree of NS. These results could guide patients in their decision to choose RARP.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the longitudinal 5-year long-term outcomes for urinary continence and quality of life (QOL) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), particularly nerve-sparing.Methods: Among patients who underwent RARP between October 2010 and October 2015, postoperative urinary symptoms were retrospectively examined using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), QOL index, and number of pads used. Patients were divided into nerve-sparing and non-nerve-sparing groups, and all data were evaluated before and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after surgery.Results: After propensity score matching, 47 patients each were included in the two groups. No significant difference in the IPSS or QOL index was seen between groups.The IPSS and QOL index showed an increase in the first month after RARP, but at 6 months, values were lower than preoperative levels and then slowly improved. Pad-free rates at 5 years after surgery were 93.6% and 80.1% in the nerve-sparing and non-nerve-sparing groups, respectively (P = .029). ICIQ-SF scores were significantly improved in the nerve-sparing compared with the non-nerve-sparing group at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. After 12 months, no significant changes were identified until 60 months.Conclusions: In this study, nerve-sparing had a strong impact on urinary continence in the early postoperative period. After 12 months, urinary continence remained stable until 60 months.

Background Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is a well-known standard procedure for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, it remains controversial whether extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD) or intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) is superior in this technique. We have developed a HYBRID method that combines ECUD and ICUD to retain the advantages of each. The purpose of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes between HYBRID and ECUD in RARC and to evaluate the usefulness of the HYBRID method. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the perioperative outcomes of 36 consecutive bladder cancer patients who underwent RARC with ileal conduit at our institution between March 2013 and December 2021. Propensity-score matching was used to align patient backgrounds between the HYBRID and ECUD groups. Results After matching, 12 cases were selected for each group. There was no significant difference in patient demographics between the groups except for the rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Mean console time was significantly longer in the HYBRID group due to intracorporeal manipulation; however, a relatively favorable trend of mean blood loss was observed in this group. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of positive surgical margin, mean number of lymph node removed, or positive lymph node. The incidences of complications associated and nonassociated with the urinary tract and grade ≥III complications at postoperative day (POD) 0-30 and 31-90 were similar between the groups. In the HYBRID group, no complications non-associated with the urinary tract or grade ≥III complications were observed at POD 31-90. Conclusion The HYBRID method takes advantage of the benefits of both ICUD and ECUD and is a highly applicable technique that can be used in a variety of patient backgrounds.