Background/AimsDespite improvements in endoscopic hemostasis and pharmacological therapies, upper gastrointestinal (UGI) ulcers repeatedly bleed in 10% to 20% of patients, and those without early endoscopic reintervention or definitive surgery might be at a high risk for mortality. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for intractability to initial endoscopic hemostasis.MethodsWe analyzed intractability among 428 patients who underwent emergency endoscopy for bleeding UGI ulcers within 24 hours of arrival at the hospital.ResultsDurable hemostasis was achieved in 354 patients by using initial endoscopic procedures. Sixty-nine patients with Forrest types Ia, Ib, IIa, and IIb at the second-look endoscopy were considered intractable to the initial endoscopic hemostasis. Multivariate analysis indicated that age ≥70 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07 to 4.03), shock on admission (OR, 5.26; 95% CI, 2.43 to 11.6), hemoglobin <8.0 mg/dL (OR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.39 to 5.91), serum albumin <3.3 g/dL (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.07 to 4.89), exposed vessels with a diameter of ≥2 mm on the bottom of ulcers (OR, 4.38; 95% CI, 1.25 to 7.01), and Forrest type Ia and Ib (OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.33 to 3.00) predicted intractable endoscopic hemostasis.ConclusionsVarious factors contribute to intractable endoscopic hemostasis. Careful observation after endoscopic hemostasis is important for patients at a high risk for incomplete hemostasis.
Sheath-assisted traction ESD, using simple materials and methods, has several advantages over other standard traction methods. Our procedure is straightforward, safe, non-invasive, cost-effective and uses readily available instruments to enhance visualization of cutting lines.
Sheath-assisted counter traction ESD by the novel sheath was technically simpler and thus less time-consuming regardless of the location of lesions, especially when =20mm in diameter. The traction ESD with the novel sheath is safe and not invasive, and it can be universally applied to standard ESD.
Background/Aim: An implication of the drinking test for gastric function is controversial. We evaluated the usefulness of a nutrient drinking test for examining gastric function by comparing it with a gastric barostat study. Methods: We investigated perceived pressure of an intragastric bag with stepwise distension and postprandial peak gastric volume (accommodation volume) with a consistent pressure after drinking a liquid meal (200 ml, 300 kcal) in 18 volunteers. Drinking a similar liquid meal on a different day at a continual rate of 15 ml/min was performed to score satiety and bloated sensations at 5-min intervals. An additional 10 volunteers performed the drinking test before and after administration of mosapride citrate or a placebo in a double-blind crossover study. Results: Pressure to induce severe discomfort correlated positively with maximum satiety volume in the drinking test (r = 0.60, p = 0.02). Accommodation volume in the barostat study showed a significant correlation (r = 0.59, p = 0.03) with threshold volume to induce bloating in the drinking test. Mosapride tended to increase the volume inducing the first bloated sensation as compared to the placebo. Conclusion: The present drinking test may be useful for evaluating the threshold to induce severe discomfort and accommodation volume.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.