Aims: The Japanese Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy revised the diagnostic criteria for pre-eclampsia (PE) to conform to those of the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP) in 2018. This study aimed to investigate whether pregnancy outcomes differ based on the presence of proteinuria and validate the adoption of the ISSHP criteria in Japan. Methods: This is a retrospective study involving 308 women diagnosed with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy at a tertiary center. They were divided into the following groups: PE with proteinuria (n = 218), PE without proteinuria (n = 45) and gestational hypertension (n = 45) according to the ISSHP criteria for comparison of pregnancy outcomes. Results: Applying the ISSHP criteria increased the number of pregnant women diagnosed as having PE by 14.6% (45 women). The difference in the rate of composite maternal complications between the two groups was unremarkable, with 33 cases (15.1%) in the PE with proteinuria group and 9 cases (20%) in the PE without proteinuria group. Moreover, composite neonatal complications occurred in 37 cases (17%) of PE with proteinuria group and 6 cases (13.3%) of PE without proteinuria group, showing remarkably similar incidence rate in the two groups. Women with PE with and without proteinuria had significantly earlier deliveries and lower neonatal birth weight than those with gestational hypertension. Conclusion: Pregnancy outcomes of PE with and without proteinuria were almost similar although their incidence increased, confirming its validity for adaptation of the ISSHP criteria in Japan.

IntroductionThis study aimed to assess the validity of applying the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) criteria for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) at any time during pregnancy.Research design and methodsThis multicenter cohort study was conducted at five Japanese facilities from January 2018 to April 2019. The study cohort included women at a high risk of GDM who met one or more of the following IADPSG criteria during early pregnancy: fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥92 mg/dL and 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) value of ≥180 mg/dL at 1 hour, or ≥153 mg/dL at 2 hour (hereafter early-onset GDM). Women diagnosed with early-onset GDM were followed up without therapeutic intervention and underwent the 75 g OGTT again during 24–28 weeks of gestation. Those exhibiting the GDM patterns on the second 75 g OGTT were diagnosed with true GDM and treated, whereas those exhibiting the normal patterns were diagnosed with false positive early GDM and received no therapeutic intervention.ResultsOf the 146 women diagnosed with early-onset GDM, 69 (47%) had normal 75 g OGTT values at 24–28 weeks of gestation, indicating a false-positive result. FPG levels were significantly higher in the first 75 g-OGTT test than in the second 75 g-OGTT test (93 mg/dL and 87.5 mg/dL, respectively; p<0.001). FPG levels were high in 86 (59%) women with early-onset GDM during early pregnancy but in only 39 (27%) women during mid-pregnancy. Compared with false positive early GDM, true GDM was more frequently associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.ConclusionsAlthough women with early-onset GDM were followed up without treatment, the results of repeated 75 g OGTT during mid-pregnancy were normal in about 50%. Our data did not support the adoption of IADPSG thresholds for the diagnosis of GDM prior to 20 weeks of gestation.

Aim To investigate how an extremely prolonged second stage of labor of 12 h or more affects maternal and neonatal outcomes. Material and methods This retrospective cohort study included nulliparous, pregnant women with 37 + 0 to 41 + 6 weeks of gestation whom vaginal delivery was attempted at the Yokohama City University Medical Center between 2014 and 2018. Results In 446 cases of the prolonged second stage of labor, there were 296 women (66%) in the 2‐ to 6‐h second stage of labor group, 112 women (25%) in the 6‐ to 12‐h group, and 38 women (8.5%) in the 12‐h or longer group. The longer the second stage of labor, the more significant was the increase in the rates of augmentation of the delivery, emergency cesarean delivery, and operative vaginal delivery. Even in the 12 h or longer group, 82% were able to have vaginal delivery. The 6‐ to 12‐h group had a significant increase in third‐ or fourth‐degree perineal lacerations compared to the 2‐ to 6‐h group (aOR 8.12 [95% CI 1.55–42.6]). Clinical chorioamnionitis was significantly increased in the 12 h or longer group (aOR 4.88 [95% CI 1.62–14.8]). In terms of neonatal outcomes, comparison between the three groups showed no significant difference. Conclusion With an extremely prolonged second stage of labor, maternal complications involved a significant increase in severe perineal lacerations and chorioamnionitis; however, there was no increase in adverse outcomes for neonates. It was not possible to conclusively determine if the duration of the second stage is acceptable.

In 2009, the United States Institute of Medicine (IOM) reported the optimal gestational weight gain (GWG) during twin pregnancy based on the pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI). However, there are ethnic variations in the relationship between GWG and pregnancy outcomes. We aimed to establish the criteria for optimal GWG during twin pregnancy in Japan. The study included cases of dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy registered in the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology Successive Pregnancy Birth Registry System between 2013 and 2017. We analyzed data for cases wherein both babies were appropriate for gestational age and delivered at term. Cases were classified into four groups based on the pre-pregnancy BMI: underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5 kg/m2 ≤BMI< 25.0 kg/m2), overweight (25.0 kg/m2 ≤BMI< 30.0 kg/m2), and obese (BMI ≥30.0 kg/m2) and we calculated the 25th–75th percentile range for GWG for the cases. The 3,936 cases were included. The GWG ranges were 11.5–16.5 kg, 10.3–16.0 kg, 6.9–14.7 kg, and 2.2–11.7 kg in the underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese groups, respectively. Thus, in the current study, the optimal GWG during twin pregnancy was lower than that specified by the IOM criteria. Factoring this in maternal management may improve the outcomes of twin pregnancies in Japan.

Background In 2010, the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) proposed new criteria indicating that gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) can be diagnosed if the fasting threshold of ≤92 mg/dL, 1-h threshold of ≤180 mg/dL, or 2-h threshold of ≤153 mg/dL are exceeded during the 75-g 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) performed at 24–28 weeks of gestation. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends using the proposed diagnostic threshold values of the IADPSG to diagnose GDM; however, it does not limit the timing of the 75-g OGTT. Since 2010 in Japan, GDM has been diagnosed using the same criteria as that proposed by the WHO. However, neither the JSOG nor the WHO has provided any evidence that it is appropriate to use a threshold beyond the range recommended by the IADPSG. Methods This was a single-centre retrospective study based on the medical records and delivery registry database of our centre. We included women who underwent a 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) with results < 140 mg/dL at 24–28 weeks of gestation and subsequently underwent a 75-g OGTT after 29 weeks of gestation with abnormal glucose tolerance suspected based on clinical findings. The reference values for the 75-g OGTT followed the IADPSG criteria. Subjects were classified into the normal glucose tolerance (NGT) group and the GDM group. The type of delivery and neonatal outcomes of the two groups were compared. A multivariable analysis was performed to match the backgrounds of both groups. Results In total, the NGT and GDM group comprised 189 and 49 women, respectively. Emergency caesarean delivery rates were similar in the GDM and NGT groups (10.6 and 12.2%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43–3.64; p = 0.74); however, the elective caesarean delivery rate was higher in the GDM group than in the NGT group (16.3 and 5.3%, respectively, adjusted OR, 3.60; 95% CI, 1.27–10.19; p = 0.01). No significant differences were observed in other maternal and neonatal outcomes between both groups. Conclusion Although a diagnosis of GDM during the third trimester does not improve pregnancy outcomes, it increases the elective caesarean delivery rate.