We retrospectively compared two groups of patients with hip fractures and severe complications. One group had been treated surgically; the other group had been treated conservatively to prevent worsening of general status, with transfer to wheelchair as soon as possible. This study aimed to determine if early prognosis after conservative treatment would be worse than that following surgical treatment. Materials and Methods:Subjects were patients (n=230) with hip fracture who had been admitted and treated at our hospital from 1993 through 2006. Patients' medical records were retroactively investigated to obtain information on age, sex, complications, type of fracture, and course of subsequent hospitalizations. Additional information for conservatively treated patients included reasons for avoiding surgery and time-to-transfer to wheelchair. In case of death, the cause and timing of death were investigated. Results:Of the 230 patients, 22 (mean age, 83.5 years) were treated conservatively. Complications at admission included cardiac disease, respiratory disease, malignancy, renal disease, dementia, and other conditions. Multiple complications were commonly seen. The reasons for selecting conservative treatment were cardiac function disturbance in 13 cases and decision of patients' families in 9 cases. Almost all patients were able to transfer to wheelchair. A total of 9 patients died in the hospital: 8 were in the surgical treatment group and 1 was in the conservative treatment group. The patients who died in the surgical treatment group had a mean age of 80.3 years, and pneumonia was the main cause of death.The timing of death ranged from 12 to 129 days after surgery. The number of perioperative deaths was 3 (1.4%). Discussion and Conclusion:This study showed that in patients with hip fractures, severe complications, and poor general conditions, early prognosis after conservative treatment aiming for early transfer to wheelchair is no worse than that following surgical treatment. Thus, conservative treatment should be considered for patients with poor ability for activities of daily living. (J Nippon Med Sch 2016; 83: 2 5)
These results revealed that varus insertion of femoral implants had no influence on short- to mid-term clinical outcomes because the pain score and ROM significantly improved in both the varus and non-varus groups. However, high rates of severe stress shielding appeared with varus insertion of femoral implants, suggesting an influence on long-term clinical outcomes.
Compared with the conventional IMHS, the Asian IMHS is smaller, has increased variations in the shaft/neck angle of the lag screw, and has a titanium-alloy construction, allowing magnetic resonance imaging. The intraoperative fracture may have occurred because of the configuration of the distal interlocking screw in the Asian IMHS. Breakage of the implant likely occurred because the nail was too small in diameter, and too short in length for the unstable AO 31-A3 fracture. If careful attention is paid to the configuration of its distal interlocking screw intraoperatively and a nail of appropriate size is selected, the Asian IMHS is better suited than the conventional IMHS for treating Japanese patients, who generally have a small physique, because of its many variations in size and angle.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.