The automated annotation of conversational video by semantic miscommunication labels is a challenging topic. Although miscommunications are often obvious to the speakers as well as the observers, it is difficult for machines to detect them from the low-level features. We investigate the utility of gestural cues in this paper among various non-verbal features. Compared with gesture recognition tasks in human-computer interaction, this process is difficult due to the lack of understanding on which cues contribute to miscommunications and the implicitness of gestures. Nine simple gestural features are taken from gesture data, and both simple and complex classifiers are constructed using machine learning. The experimental results suggest that there is no single gestural feature that can predict or explain the occurrence of semantic miscommunication in our setting.
Psychotherapists, who use their communicative skills to assist people, review their dialogue practices and improve their skills from their experiences. However, technology has not been fully exploited for this purpose. In this study, we analyze the use of head movements during actual psychotherapeutic dialogues between two participants—therapist and client—using video recordings and head-mounted accelerometers. Accelerometers have been utilized in the mental health domain but not for analyzing mental health related communications. We examined the relationship between the state of the interaction and temporally varying head nod and movement patterns in psychological counseling sessions. Head nods were manually annotated and the head movements were measured using accelerometers. Head nod counts were analyzed based on annotations taken from video data. We conducted cross-correlation analysis of the head movements of the two participants using the accelerometer data. The results of two case studies suggest that upward and downward head nod count patterns may reflect stage transitions in counseling dialogues and that peaks of head movement synchrony may be related to emphasis in the interaction.
Original version of Solution Building Inventory (SBI), developed by Smock et al. (2010), assesses an individual's ability to identify exceptions, solutions and hope in the future. The purpose of this study was to develop a Japanese version of the Solution Building Inventory (SBI-J) and test its psychometric properties. Six hundred and eighteen Japanese undergraduate students completed the SBI-J along with the Dispositional Hope Scale (DHS) and the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R). Factor analyses found that the SBI-J is a one factor model with an acceptable fit containing 13-items. Strong internal consistency were also found (α=.879). Moreover, the SBI-J also possesses convergent validity. Overall, the SBI-J is a reliable and valid measure of the construct of solution building.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.