XYY syndrome is characterized by a variable neurodevelopmental phenotype, with features including developmental delays, cognitive impairments, and an increased risk for mental health conditions. There are two recent developments that have primarily motivated this review. The first is the increased use of non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS), which will likely result in more individuals being diagnosed with XYY prenatally. As such, health care providers (HCPs) both within genetics and outside of the specialty are more likely to encounter this diagnosis in the future. The second is advances in the understanding of the phenotypic variability of XYY through biobank and deep phenotyping efforts. As the phenotypic spectrum of XYY syndrome continues to expand, families will face greater uncertainty when receiving this diagnosis. Given both of these developments, HCPs will need to have up-to-date and accurate information about XYY to better counsel families. Furthermore, the ability to employ effective counseling techniques, such as anticipatory guidance, will aid in supporting and guiding families through the diagnostic journey. This review aims to provide insight on the neurodevelopmental and psychosocial aspects of XYY syndrome by discussing current research and borrowing from the relevant psychosocial literature of other genetic conditions. In this way, we hope to equip HCPs with the ultimate goal of improving the care and support provided to individuals with XYY and their families.
PurposeThough copy number variants (CNVs) have been suggested to play a significant role in inborn errors of immunity (IEI), the precise nature of this role remains largely unexplored. We sought to determine the diagnostic contribution of CNVs using genome-wide chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in children with IEI.MethodsWe performed exome sequencing (ES) and CMA for 332 unrelated pediatric probands referred for evaluation of IEI. The analysis included primary, secondary, and incidental findings.ResultsOf the 332 probands, 134 (40.4%) received molecular diagnoses. Of these, 116/134 (86.6%) were diagnosed by ES alone. An additional 15/134 (11.2%) were diagnosed by CMA alone, including two likely de novo changes. Three (2.2%) participants had diagnostic molecular findings from both ES and CMA, including two compound heterozygotes and one participant with two distinct diagnoses. Half of the participants with CMA contribution to diagnosis had CNVs in at least one non-immune gene, highlighting the clinical complexity of these cases. Overall, CMA contributed to 18/134 diagnoses (13.4%), increasing the overall diagnostic yield by 15.5% beyond ES alone.ConclusionPairing ES and CMA can provide a comprehensive evaluation to clarify the complex factors that contribute to both immune and non-immune phenotypes. Such a combined approach to genetic testing helps untangle complex phenotypes, not only by clarifying the differential diagnosis, but in some cases by identifying multiple diagnoses contributing to the overall clinical presentation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.