Though an extensive body of scholarship has characterized both Humbert Humbert and his author, Vladimir Nabokov, as exiles, an examination of humor in Lolita situates both figures in the more detached position of nomads. Humbert does not experience the exile's desire for a return to his homeland. Instead, his repeated use of incongruity-ambiguity humor consistently places him outside of two or more juxtaposed systems of discourse, in a position to constitute their meaning rather than be constituted by it. Though Nabokov holds this freedom of consciousness as his highest aesthetic ideal, the power over meaning-making that Humbert cultivates through his use of humor allows him to justify his violation of Lolita. In this way, Lolita is a penetratingly moral novel that dramatizes the dark consequences of human beings' freedom of thought.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.