Background Evaluating handgrip strength (HGS) asymmetry may help to improve the prognostic value of HGS. This study sought to determine the associations of HGS asymmetry and weakness on future activities of daily living (ADL) disability in a national sample of aging Americans. Methods The analytic sample included 18,468 Americans aged ≥50 years from the 2006–2016 waves of the Health and Retirement Study. A handgrip dynamometer measured HGS. Those with HGS >10% stronger on either hand were considered as having any HGS asymmetry. Individuals with HGS >10% stronger on their dominant hand were considered as having dominant HGS asymmetry, while those with HGS >10% stronger on their nondominant hand were classified as having nondominant HGS asymmetry. Men with HGS <26 kg and women with HGS <16 kg were considered weak. ADLs were self-reported. Generalized estimating equations were used for analyses. Results Relative to those with symmetric HGS and no weakness, each HGS asymmetry and weakness group had increased odds for future ADL disability: 1.11 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–1.20) for any HGS asymmetry alone, 1.42 (CI: 1.16–1.74) for weakness alone, and 1.81 (CI: 1.52–2.16) for both any HGS asymmetry and weakness. Most weakness and HGS asymmetry dominance groups had increased odds for future ADL disability: 1.30 (CI: 1.13–1.50) for nondominant HGS asymmetry alone, 1.42 (CI: 1.16–1.74) for weakness alone, 1.72 (CI: 1.29–2.29) for both weakness and nondominant HGS asymmetry, and 1.86 (CI: 1.52–2.28) for both weakness and dominant HGS asymmetry. Conclusions HGS asymmetry and weakness together may increase the predictive utility of handgrip dynamometers.

No abstract

No abstract

Objectives A natural decline of muscle strength occurs during the aging process; however, preserving muscle strength may lower the rate of many preventable diseases such as diabetes, especially in higher risk populations. The purpose of this study was to examine the sex-specific association between muscle weakness and incident diabetes in older Mexican Americans. Design Observational, longitudinal study. Setting Urban and rural households in the Southwestern United States. Participants A subsample of 1,903 Mexican Americans aged at least 65 years without diabetes at baseline were followed for 19 years. Measurements Muscle weakness was assessed with a hand-held dynamometer and was normalized to body weight (normalized grip strength (NGS)). Male and female participants were categorized as weak if their NGS was ≤0.46 and ≤0.30, respectively. Sex-stratified Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to determine the association between muscle weakness and incident diabetes (self-reported) when using age as an entry variable and after adjusting for education, employment status, instrumental activities of daily living disability, interview language, marital status, and obesity. A sensitivity analysis was performed to account for influential outliers for the outcome variable (incident diabetes) and the model was re-run. Results The hazard ratio for incident diabetes was 1.05 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.02–1.09; p<0.001) in weak vs. not-weak males and 1.38 (CI: 1.35–1.41; p<0.001) in weak vs. not-weak females, after adjusting for relevant covariates. Conclusions Muscle weakness was associated with an increased rate of diabetes in older Mexican American males and females. Health professionals should encourage activities that preserve muscle strength, thereby preventing the incidence of diabetes in older Mexican Americans.

No abstract