ObjectiveTo determine patient, institution, and machine characteristics that contribute to variation in radiation doses used for computed tomography (CT).DesignProspective cohort study.SettingData were assembled and analyzed from the University of California San Francisco CT International Dose Registry.ParticipantsStandardized data from over 2.0 million CT examinations of adults who underwent CT between November 2015 and August 2017 from 151 institutions, across seven countries (Switzerland, Netherlands, Germany, United Kingdom, United States, Israel, and Japan).Main outcome measuresMean effective doses and proportions of high dose examinations for abdomen, chest, combined chest and abdomen, and head CT were determined by patient characteristics (sex, age, and size), type of institution (trauma center, care provision 24 hours per day and seven days per week, academic, private), institutional practice volume, machine factors (manufacturer, model), country, and how scanners were used, before and after adjustment for patient characteristics, using hierarchical linear and logistic regression. High dose examinations were defined as CT scans with doses above the 75th percentile defined during a baseline period.ResultsThe mean effective dose and proportion of high dose examinations varied substantially across institutions. The doses varied modestly (10-30%) by type of institution and machine characteristics after adjusting for patient characteristics. By contrast, even after adjusting for patient characteristics, wide variations in radiation doses across countries persisted, with a fourfold range in mean effective dose for abdomen CT examinations (7.0-25.7 mSv) and a 17-fold range in proportion of high dose examinations (4-69%). Similar variation across countries was observed for chest (mean effective dose 1.7-6.4 mSv, proportion of high dose examinations 1-26%) and combined chest and abdomen CT (10.0-37.9 mSv, 2-78%). Doses for head CT varied less (1.4-1.9 mSv, 8-27%). In multivariable models, the dose variation across countries was primarily attributable to institutional decisions regarding technical parameters (that is, how the scanners were used).ConclusionsCT protocols and radiation doses vary greatly across countries and are primarily attributable to local choices regarding technical parameters, rather than patient, institution, or machine characteristics. These findings suggest that the optimization of doses to a consistent standard should be possible.Study registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT03000751.

I ntracranial hemorrhage is a potentially life-threatening problem that has many direct and indirect causes. Accuracy in diagnosing the presence and type of intracranial hemorrhage is a critical part of effective treatment. Diagnosis is often an urgent procedure requiring review of medical images by highly trained specialists and sometimes necessitating confirmation through clinical history, vital signs, and laboratory examinations. The process is complicated and requires immediate identification for optimal treatment.Intracranial hemorrhage is a relatively common condition that has many causes, including trauma, stroke, aneurysm, vascular malformation, high blood pressure, illicit drugs, and blood clotting disorders (1). Neurologic consequences can vary extensively from headache to death depending upon the size, type, and location of the hemorrhage. The role of the radiologist is to detect the hemorrhage, characterize the type and cause of the hemorrhage, and to determine if the hemorrhage could be jeopardizing critical areas of the brain that might require immediate surgery.While all acute hemorrhages appear attenuated on CT images, the primary imaging features that help radiologists determine the cause of hemorrhage are the location, shape, and proximity to other structures. Intraparenchymal hemorrhage is blood that is located completely within the brain itself. Intraventricular or subarachnoid hemorrhage is blood that has leaked into the spaces of the brain that normally contain cerebrospinal fluid (the ventricles or subarachnoid cisterns, respectively). Extra-axial hemorrhage is blood that collects in the tissue coverings that surround the brain (eg, subdural or epidural subtypes). It is important to note that patients may exhibit more than one type of cerebral hemorrhage, which may appear on the same image or imaging study. Although small hemorrhages are typically less morbid than large hemorrhages, even a small hemorrhage can lead to death if it is in a critical location. Small hemorrhages also may herald future hemorrhages that could be fatal (eg, ruptured cerebral aneurysm). The presence or absence of hemorrhage may guide specific treatments (eg, stroke).Detection of cerebral hemorrhage with brain CT is a popular clinical use case for machine learning (2-5). Many of these early successful investigations were based upon relatively small datasets (hundreds of examinations) from single institutions. Chilamkurthy et al created a diverse brain CT dataset that was selected from 20 geographically distinct centers in India (more than 21 000 unique examinations). This was used to create smaller randomly selected subsets for validation and testing on common acute brain abnormalities (6). The ability for machine learning algorithms to generalize to "real-world" clinical imaging data from disparate institutions is paramount to successful use in the clinical environment.The intent for this challenge was to provide a large multiinstitutional and multinational dataset to help develop machine learning algorithms that ca...

Kyphoplasty increased vertebral body height more than vertebroplasty in this model of acutely created fractures in fresh cadaver specimens.

Headache is one of the most common human afflictions. In most cases, headaches are benign and idiopathic, and resolve spontaneously or with minor therapeutic measures. Imaging is not required for many types of headaches. However, patients presenting with headaches in the setting of "red flags" such as head trauma, cancer, immunocompromised state, pregnancy, patients 50 years or older, related to activity or position, or with a corresponding neurological deficit, may benefit from CT, MRI, or noninvasive vascular imaging to identify a treatable cause. This publication addresses the initial imaging strategies for headaches associated with the following features: severe and sudden onset, optic disc edema, "red flags," migraine or tension-type, trigeminal autonomic origin, and chronic headaches with and without new or progressive features.The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Nontraumatic neck pain is a leading cause of disability, with nearly 50% of individuals experiencing ongoing or recurrent symptoms. Radiographs are appropriate as initial imaging for cervical or neck pain in the absence of "red flag" symptoms or if there are unchanging chronic symptoms; however, spondylotic changes are commonly identified and may result in both false-positive and false-negative findings. Noncontrast CT can be complementary to radiographs for evaluation of new or changing symptoms in the setting of prior cervical spine surgery or in the assessment of extent of ossification in the posterior longitudinal ligament. Noncontrast MRI is usually appropriate for assessment of new or increasing radiculopathy due to improved nerve root definition. MRI without and with contrast is usually appropriate in patients with new or increasing cervical or neck pain or radiculopathy in the setting of suspected infection or known malignancy. Imaging may be appropriate; however, it is not always indicated for evaluation of cervicogenic headache without neurologic deficit.