CD27 and CD28 have emerged as indicators demarcating the transition of thymocytes through beta-selection. We found that CD28 exhibits a greater dynamic range of expression during this phase, thus it was employed to further parse the DN/CD44(-) compartment in order to assess IL-7 signaling during the beta-selection process. Plotting CD28 versus CD25 expression revealed six DN/CD44(-) populations. OP9-DL1 stromal cell co-culture was used to demonstrate a developmental linkage from DN3a (CD25(+)CD28(-/lo)) to DN3b (CD25(+)CD28(+)) to DN3c (CD25(int)CD28(+)) to DN4a (CD25(-)CD28(+)) to double positive (DP) and showed the DN4b (CD25(-)CD28(hi)) and DN4c (CD25(-)CD28(-/lo)) populations to be inefficient in producing DP cells. Using CD69 as an additional marker to further parse the DN4a population, we found the pre-DP cells to be the CD44(-)CD25(-)CD28(int)CD69(-)CD4(-/lo)CD8(-/lo) subset. Using this refined developmental scheme, IL-7R alpha expression was found to be transiently up-regulated post-beta-selection in the DN3b and DN3c subsets; however, this increase did not confer enhanced responsiveness over that observed in the DN3a population. CD28 messenger RNA expression was up-regulated in post-beta-selected cells, whereas transcripts for CD27, IL-7R alpha and Bcl-2 were lower than that observed in the DN3a population. This study refines the current thymocyte differentiation scheme to allow for more detailed evaluation of events controlling early T-cell development, specifically surrounding the beta-selection checkpoint.
Background. Clinical trials are an important therapeutic option for cancer patients. Although financial burden in cancer treatment is well-documented, the financial burden associated with clinical trials is not well understood. Patients and Methods. We conducted a survey regarding economic burden and financial toxicity in cancer patients enrolled in Phase I clinical trials for >1 month. Financial Toxicity Score (FTS) was assessed using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) survey. Patients also reported monthly out-of-pocket (OOP) costs. Results. 213 patients completed the survey (72% non-Hispanic white, 45% with annual income ≤$60,000, 50% lived >300 miles from the clinic; 37% required air travel). 48% of patients had monthly OOP costs of at least $1000. 55% and 64% of patients reported unanticipated medical and non-medical expenses, respectively. Worse financial toxicity was associated with yearly household income < $60,000 (OR: 2.7, P=0.008), having unanticipated medical costs (OR: 3.2, P=0.024), and living >100 miles away from the clinical trial hospital (OR: 2.3, P=0.043). Nonwhite or Hispanic patients (OR: 2.5, P=0.011) and patients who were unemployed or not working outside the home (OR: 2.5, P=0.016) were more likely to report high unanticipated medical costs. Conclusion. Among cancer patients participating in clinical trials, economic burden is high, and most of patients' OOP costs were non-medical costs. Financial toxicity is disproportionally higher in patients with lower income and those who travel farther, and unexpected medical costs were more common among nonwhite or Hispanic patients. OOP costs can be substantial and are often unexpected for patients. The Oncologist 2021;9999:• • Implications for Practice: The financial burden of cancer treatment is well-documented but there is limited data regarding the financial burden associated with cancer clinical trials. We surveyed 213 patients enrolled on early-phase clinical trials. Monthly out-of-pocket non-medical expenses were $1,075 and medical expenses were $475. Worse financial toxicity was associated with income <$60,000 and living farther away from the hospital. Racial/ethnic minorities had higher rates of unanticipated medical costs. These data help to quantify the high financial burden for patients and may reveal a cause of disparities in clinical trial enrollment for underrepresented populations.
Systematic ascertainment of women early in pregnancy, preferably in a population base, is needed for assessment of true risks. Long-term follow-up is needed to rule out neurobehavioral effects.
12 Background: Encorafenib (E) and cetuximab (C) offers short-lived response and survival benefit for patients (pts) with MSS, BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). BRAF + EGFR inhibition induced a transient MSI-H phenotype in preclinical models of MSS, BRAFV600E CRC and may prime these tumors for response to immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 antibodies like nivolumab (N). Methods: In this single-arm, single-institution, phase I/II clinical trial, pts with treatment-refractory MSS, BRAFV600E metastatic CRC were eligible. No prior BRAF inhibitors, anti-EGFR antibody, or immunotherapy was permitted. Pts received E (300 mg PO daily), C (500 mg/m2 IV q14 days), and N (480 mg IV q28 days). The primary endpoints were best overall response (RECIST 1.1) and safety/tolerability (CTCAE v5). A Simon two-stage design (H0: p≤.22; Ha: p≥.45, where p= percentage of pts with radiographic response) was employed using a one-sided α=.05 and β=.20. In the first stage, ≥ 4/15 responses were needed in order for the trial to enroll 11 additional pts. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated via Kaplan-Meier. Results: All 26 pts have been enrolled - 23 patients treated, and 21 evaluable for response so far. Median age is 59 years (range, 32-85), and 14 (54%) are female. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (AE) occurred in 4/22 (18%) patients. Grade 3 AEs included colitis, maculopapular rash, leukocytosis, and elevated amylase/lipase (all N=1). Grade 4 AEs in a single patient were myositis/myocarditis. Overall response rate is 45% (95% CI, 23-68), and disease control rate is 95% (95% CI, 75-100). Median PFS is 7.3 months (95% CI, 5.5-NA). Median OS is 11.4 months (95% CI, 7.6-NA). For the 9 pts thus far with responses, median duration of response is 8.1 months (95% CI, 7.3-NA). Updated results will be presented. Conclusions: E + C + N is effective and well-tolerated for pts with MSS, BRAFV600E metastatic CRC. The E+C+N regimen met its predefined efficacy endpoint and suggests a role for immunotherapy as a novel combination approach for this specific subpopulation of MSS metastatic CRC. A follow-up randomized phase II trial (SWOG 2107) to evaluate encorafenib/cetuximab with or without nivolumab in pts with MSS, BRAFV600E metastatic CRC will activate in early 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT04017650.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.