There is a growing focus on child wellbeing and happiness in schools, but we lack self-report measures for very young children. Three samples (N = 2345) were combined to assess the psychometric properties of the How I Feel About My School (HIFAMS) questionnaire, which was designed for children aged 4-8 years. Test re-test reliability was moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.62). HIFAMS assessed a single concept and had moderate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha values from 0.62 to 0.67). There were low correlations between scores on the child-reported HIFAMS and parent-and teacher reports. Children at risk of exclusion had significantly lower HIFAMS scores than the community sample (mean difference = 2.4; 95% CI: 1.6 to 3.2; p < 0.001). Schools contributed only 4.5% of the variability in HIFAMS score; the remaining 95.5% reflecting pupil differences within schools.Girls' scores were 0.37 units (95% CI: 0.16 to 0.57; p < 0.001) higher than boys, while year group and deprivation did not predict HIFAMS score. HIFAMS is a promising measure that demonstrates moderate reliability and discriminates between groups even among very young children.
Positive and supportive relationships promote healthy child development and resilience, 1 including those formed within school. Many qualified teachers' report insufficient training in the management of socioemotional and behavioural difficulties, which they cite as a common source of stress and burnout.
Purpose: We explore the feasibility of a classroom management course as a public health intervention. Improved socio-emotional skills may boost children's developmental and academic trajectory, while the costs of behaviour problems are enormous for schools with considerable impact on others' well-being.Method: 40 teachers attended the Incredible Years Teacher Classroom Management (TCM) intervention in groups of 10. Afterwards teachers attended focus groups and semi-structured interviews were completed with headteachers to explore whether TCM was feasible, relevant and useful, research processes were acceptable, and if it influenced teachers' practice and pupils.Teachers completed standardised questionnaires about their professional self-efficacy, burnout and well-being before and after attendance.
Research limitations/implications:Although preliminary and small, these feasibility study findings suggest that it was worthwhile proceeding to a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT).
Practical and social implications:Should the RCT demonstrate effectiveness, then the intervention is an obvious candidate for implementation as a whole school approach. Originality / value: Successful intervention with one teacher potentially benefits every child that they subsequently teach and may increase the inclusion of socio-economically deprived children living in challenging circumstances in mainstream education.
When children with special educational needs are excluded from school, it should raise the concern that these children are not receiving adequate help and support. This systematic review aims to identify the prevalence of psychiatric disorder or impairing psychopathology among children who are excluded from school compared to children who are not excluded from school. The review follows the guidelines set out by the Centre of Research and Dissemination (Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 2009). We used broad search terms (across 16 databases) in order to avoid missing papers, our initial screening stage involved 3712 titles and abstracts. Five studies finally met our inclusion criteria. The results from these studies suggest that the odds of children who have been excluded from school having some kind of impairing psychological or behavioural impairment is increased in comparison to children who have not been excluded (odds ratios ranging from 1.13–31.9). However, the paucity of primary research in this area, combined with methodological weaknesses in the identified studies makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions. The need for education and mental health professionals to work together to provide the appropriate support for all children at risk of exclusion is of great and immediate concern.
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to explore the association between children who are at risk of being or who have been excluded from school between the ages of 4 and 12 years and the role of psychopathology, development and attainment.
Design/methodology/approach
– A case-control approach was conducted. Cases were children who had been excluded from school compared to those who had no reported exclusions and normative data where possible. A range of measures were used to collect information from the parent, child and teacher on areas covering the child’s mental health and well-being.
Findings
– The findings showed the number of difficulties faced by children who are at risk of being or who have been excluded from school compared to gender- and age-matched controls and normative data increased. Behavioural difficulties were apparent in the majority of the cases and an alarming number of children reported self-harm. Interestingly nearly all the cases had recognised needs, but not all of them were accessing appropriate services.
Practical implications
– There have been a number of changes regarding the identification and support of children’s mental health and well-being. This study highlights gaps in resources and provision, particularly around behavioural difficulties for children who are presenting as not coping in school.
Originality/value
– The findings from the SKIP study indicate the complexities and compounded difficulties faced by children who are experiencing exclusion from school. By implementing a systematic group of assessments the study was able to identify these complexities of need across a vulnerable group of children.
SummaryThere has been increasing interest in how to assist people to ‘live well’ with advancing and incurable conditions late into life. This article considers the progress made in mental health services for adults of working age which promote active involvement in their care and how these principles can be applied to older adults with dementia. The concept of ‘recovery’ and its applicability to dementia care are discussed. The Wellness Recovery Action Plan (WRAP) and how it could be translated and modified to the needs of people with dementia are explored. This is especially important in light of the UK National Dementia Strategy, which emphasises early diagnosis and intervention to promote improved care and quality of life.
There is a growing focus on child wellbeing and happiness in schools, but we lack self-report measures for very young children. Three samples (N = 2345) were combined to assess the psychometric properties of the How I Feel About My School (HIFAMS) questionnaire, which was designed for children aged 4-8 years. Test re-test reliability was moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.62). HIFAMS assessed a single concept and had moderate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha values from 0.62 to 0.67). There were low correlations between scores on the child-reported HIFAMS and parent-and teacher reports. Children at risk of exclusion had significantly lower HIFAMS scores than the community sample (mean difference = 2.4; 95% CI: 1.6 to 3.2; p < 0.001). Schools contributed only 4.5% of the variability in HIFAMS score; the remaining 95.5% reflecting pupil differences within schools.Girls' scores were 0.37 units (95% CI: 0.16 to 0.57; p < 0.001) higher than boys, while year group and deprivation did not predict HIFAMS score. HIFAMS is a promising measure that demonstrates moderate reliability and discriminates between groups even among very young children.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.