Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of home visiting programmes that offer health promotion and preventive care to older people. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 studies of home visiting. Participants Older people living at home, including frail older people at risk of adverse outcomes. Outcome measures Mortality, admission to hospital, admission to institutional care, functional status, health status. Results Home visiting was associated with a significant reduction in mortality. The pooled odds ratio for eight studies that assessed mortality in members of the general elderly population was 0.76 (95% confidence interval 0.64 to 0.89). Five studies of home visiting to frail older people who were at risk of adverse outcomes also showed a significant reduction in mortality (0.72; 0.54 to 0.97). Home visiting was associated with a significant reduction in admissions to long term care in members of the general elderly population (0.65; 0.46 to 0.91). For three studies of home visiting to frail, "at risk" older people, the pooled odds ratio was 0.55 (0.35 to 0.88). Meta-analysis of six studies of home visiting to members of the general elderly population showed no significant reduction in admissions to hospital (odds ratio 0.95; 0.80 to 1.09). Three studies showed no significant effect on health (standardised effect size 0.06; -0.07 to 0.18). Four studies showed no effect on activities of daily living (0.05; -0.07 to 0.17). Conclusion Home visits to older people can reduce mortality and admission to long term institutional care.

No abstract

This article explores the contribution of self-help/mutual aid groups to mental well-being. Self-help/mutual aid groups are self-organising groups where people come together to address a shared a health or social issue through mutual support. They are associated with a range of health and social benefits, but remain poorly understood. This article draws on data from stage one of ESTEEM, a project which runs from 2010 to 2013. Stage one ran from 2010 to 2011 and involved participatory, qualitative research carried out in two UK sites. Twenty-one groups were purposively selected to include a range of focal issues, longevity, structures and ethnic backgrounds. Researchers carried out 21 interviews with group coordinators and twenty group discussions with members to explore the groups' purpose, nature and development. Preliminary analysis of the data suggested that mental well-being was a common theme across the groups. Subsequently the data were re-analysed to explore the groups' contribution to mental well-being using a checklist of protective factors for mental well-being as a coding framework. The findings showed that groups made a strong contribution to members' mental well-being by enhancing a sense of control, increasing resilience and facilitating participation. Group members were uplifted by exchanging emotional and practical support; they gained self-esteem, knowledge and confidence, thereby increasing their control over their situation. For some groups, socio-economic factors limited their scope and threatened their future. The article provides an evidence-base which illustrates how self-help/mutual aid groups can enhance mental well-being. If supported within a strategy for social justice, these groups enable people with varied concerns to develop a tailored response to their specific needs. The authors suggest that policy-makers engage with local people, investing in support proportionate to the needs of different populations, enabling them to develop their own self-help/mutual aid groups to enhance their sense of mental well-being.

The provision of continuing care for older people has largely shifted from the hospital setting to the community, and nursing homes increasingly provide support for older people, many of whom exhibit multiple pathology and complex health and social care needs. However, the quality of pain management within this setting has been identified as an issue of concern. It has been estimated that approximately two-thirds of people aged 65 years and over experience chronic pain, and that the prevalence of chronic pain in nursing home residents is between 45% and 80%. However, there exist a number of barriers to the identification and management of chronic pain among older people resident in nursing homes, including sensory impairments in older people themselves and educational deficits among professionals. Such barriers need to be overcome if pain management is to be improved. The present study involved administering a pre-piloted postal questionnaire to the managers of 121 nursing homes within a geographically defined area. Sixty-eight (56%) were completed and returned. The questionnaire broadly covered the following: prevalence of chronic pain and use of interventions; assessment and management strategies; education and training; and communication barriers. Overall, 37% of nursing home residents were identified as experiencing chronic non-malignant pain (pain lasting longer than 3 months not caused by cancer) and 2% were reported as experiencing chronic malignant pain (pain lasting for more than 3 months caused by cancer). Paracetamol was identified as the most 'often' used analgesia for both pain modalities. Sixty-nine per cent of nursing homes did not have a written policy regarding pain management and 75% did not use a standardised pain assessment tool. Forty-four per cent of nursing homes provided education or training sessions for qualified staff and 34% provided this for care assistants. Forty per cent of qualified staff and 85% of care assistants had no specialist knowledge regarding the management of pain in older people. The present study confirms the need for the development of effective pain management strategies underpinned by appropriate training and education in order to meet the particular needs of older people.