Peri-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection increases postoperative mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal duration of planned delay before surgery in patients who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection. This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study included patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery during October 2020. Surgical patients with pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection were compared with those without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality. Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted 30-day mortality rates stratified by time from diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection to surgery. Among 140,231 patients (116 countries), 3127 patients (2.2%) had a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Adjusted 30-day mortality in patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection was 1.5% (95%CI 1.4-1.5). In patients with a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, mortality was increased in patients having surgery within 0-2 weeks, 3-4 weeks and 5-6 weeks of the diagnosis (odds ratio (95%CI) 4.1 (3.3-4.8), 3.9 (2.6-5.1) and 3.6 (2.0-5.2), respectively). Surgery performed ≥ 7 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was associated with a similar mortality risk to baseline (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.5 (0.9-2.1)). After a ≥ 7 week delay in undertaking surgery following SARS-CoV-2 infection, patients with ongoing symptoms had a higher mortality than patients whose symptoms had resolved or who had been asymptomatic (6.0% (95%CI 3.2-8.7) vs. 2.4% (95%CI 1.4-3.4) vs. 1.3% (95%CI 0.6-2.0), respectively). Where possible, surgery should be delayed for at least 7 weeks following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with ongoing symptoms ≥ 7 weeks from diagnosis may benefit from further delay.

SARS-CoV-2 has been associated with an increased rate of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients. Since surgical patients are already at higher risk of venous thromboembolism than general populations, this study aimed to determine if patients with peri-operative or prior SARS-CoV-2 were at further increased risk of venous thromboembolism. We conducted a planned sub-study and analysis from an international, multicentre, prospective cohort study of elective and emergency patients undergoing surgery during October 2020. Patients from all surgical specialties were included. The primary outcome measure was venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis) within 30 days of surgery. SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was defined as peri-operative (7 days before to 30 days after surgery); recent (1-6 weeks before surgery); previous (≥7 weeks before surgery); or none. Information on prophylaxis regimens or pre-operative anti-coagulation for baseline comorbidities was not available. Postoperative venous thromboembolism rate was 0.5% (666/123,591) in patients without SARS-CoV-2; 2.2% (50/2317) in patients with peri-operative SARS-CoV-2; 1.6% (15/953) in patients with recent SARS-CoV-2; and 1.0% (11/1148) in patients with previous SARS-CoV-2. After adjustment for confounding factors, patients with peri-operative (adjusted odds ratio 1.5 (95%CI 1.1-2.0)) and recent SARS-CoV-2 (1.9 (95%CI 1.2-3.3)) remained at higher risk of venous thromboembolism, with a borderline finding in previous SARS-CoV-2 (1.7 (95%CI 0.9-3.0)). Overall, venous thromboembolism was independently associated with 30-day mortality ). In patients with SARS-CoV-2, mortality without venous thromboembolism was 7.4% (319/4342) and with venous thromboembolism was 40.8% (31/76). Patients undergoing surgery with peri-operative or recent SARS-CoV-2 appear to be at increased risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism compared with patients with no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Optimal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment are unknown in this cohort of patients, and these data should be interpreted accordingly.

Core needle biopsy (CNB) is the first-choice method of sampling suspicious, focal breast lesions for histological analysis. Here we present the case of a 65-year-old woman who was recalled for evaluation of the left breast following a screening mammogram. An ultrasound-guided biopsy was performed using a disposable core biopsy needle and 3 weeks later a magnetic resonance imaging scan showed a distended vessel with adjacent sac measuring 17 × 15mm2. A Doppler ultrasound scan confirmed pseudoaneurysm. A review of the literature was made on breast pseudoaneurysm following CNB, and over the past 20 years there were few other reports. Pseudoaneurysms in the breast are a rare but serious complication of CNBs. They may spontaneously thrombose, but often require intervention, so it is essential that clinicians are aware of the risk.

Both encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) and calciphylaxis are rare but severe complications involving patients with end-stage renal disease. In this report, we discuss a unique case of a 73-year-old female patient who had undergone 8 years of peritoneal dialysis for IgA nephropathy and concurrently developed these two synchronous complications within 3 months of each other. Diagnosis and management of both conditions were discussed in detail as well as the possible association between the two. With surgical treatment for EPS and measures to minimise bone mineral disorder abnormalities, both complications have been successfully managed to date.

Introduction Simulation is a well-known method of effectively teaching Medical students. Surgical simulation is a gap within the curriculum, especially Surgical on-call simulations. To improve this, we ran simulation sessions designed to replicate a General Surgery themed on-call shift that junior doctors should be able to manage. We aimed to improve confidence in clinical prioritisation and confidence in being an on-call Junior doctor, managing the most common on-call surgical tasks. Method Groups of 3-4 final year Medical students participated in a 2 hour-long simulated “on-call” shift, throughout the hospital. There were 8 scenarios, which ranged from prescribing to acute clinical scenarios. Students were given bleeps and were called at set times. They had to receive/give handovers and prioritise tasks according to clinical importance. A debrief following the session focussed on prioritisation and highlighted key learning points. The students completed a pre- and post-session questionnaire as assessment. Results The percentage of students who felt confident or very confident in the following domains were compared pre- and post-simulation respectively: confidence in clinical prioritisation (17% vs 86%); confidence in prescribing medication (0% vs 14%); confidence in escalation to seniors (33% vs 71%). 87.5% of the participants felt the session was an effective way to learn how to prioritise clinical tasks, and 100% felt this an effective way to learn about common General Surgical queries whilst on-call. Conclusion This project demonstrates how simulation is also effective in improving confidence in prioritisation and knowledge within clinical practice, especially surgery.