Warnings about convective-scale hazards are currently based on observations, but the time has come to develop warning methods in which numerical model forecasts play a much larger role.

A synoptic-dynamic climatology was constructed using all 24-h 2-in. (50.8 mm) or greater rainfall events in nine states affected by heavy rains and flooding from June through September 1993 using 6-or 12-h gridded analyses from the Regional Data Assimilation System and geostationary satellite imagery. Each of the 85 events was assigned a category (0-4) based on the areal coverage of the 3-in. (76.2 mm) or greater observed precipitation isohyet. A variety of meteorological fields and rules of thumb used by forecasters at the Hydrometeorological Prediction Center are investigated that may help identify the most likely location and scale of a convective precipitation event.The heaviest rain usually fell to the north (downwind) of the axis of highest 850-mb winds and moisture flux in an area of 850-mb warm temperature and equivalent potential temperature advection. The rainfall maximum also usually occurred to the north or northeast of the axis of highest 850-mb equivalent potential temperature. The scale and intensity of the rainfall appeared to be related to 1) the magnitude of the warm advection, 2) the 1000-500-mb mean relative humidity, 3) the breadth of the axis of stronger values of moisture transport feeding northward into a surface boundary, 4) the strength of low-level moisture flux convergence, and 5) the length of the low-level moisture flux convergence that was aligned along the mean flow upstream from the location of the rainfall maximum. The latter finding suggests that propagation plays an important role in modulating the scale and intensity of rainfall events.

Recommendations by the National Research Council (NRC), the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and Weather-Ready Nation workshop participants have encouraged the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the broader weather enterprise to explore and expand the use of probabilistic information to convey weather forecast uncertainty. Forecasting a Continuum of Environmental Threats (FACETs) is a concept being explored by NOAA to address those recommendations and also potentially shift the National Weather Service (NWS) from (primarily) teletype-era, deterministic watch–warning products to high-resolution, probabilistic hazard information (PHI) spanning periods from days (and longer) to within minutes of high-impact weather and water events. FACETs simultaneously i) considers a reinvention of the NWS hazard forecasting and communication paradigm so as to deliver multiscale, user-specific probabilistic guidance from numerical weather prediction ensembles and ii) provides a comprehensive framework to organize the physical, social, and behavioral sciences, the technology, and the practices needed to achieve that reinvention. The first applications of FACETs have focused on thunderstorm phenomena, but the FACETs concept is envisioned to extend to the attributes of any environmental hazards that can be described probabilistically (e.g., winter, tropical, and aviation weather). This paper introduces the FACETs vision, the motivation for its creation, the research and development under way to explore that vision, its relevance to operational forecasting and society, and possible strategies for implementation.

Test beds have become an integral part of the weather enterprise, bridging research and forecast services by transitioning innovative tools and tested methods that impact forecasts and forecast users. O ver roughly the last decade, a variety of "test beds" have come into existence focused on high-impact weather and the core tools of meteorology-observations, models, and fundamental understanding of the underlying physical processes. They have entered the proverbial "valley of death" between research and forecast operations (NAS 2000), Develop and introduce new ideas, data, etc. Input Revise and iterate Experiment and demonstrate End testing Output Test and refine loop V Assess impacts and evaluate and have survived. This paper provides a brief background on how this happened; summarizes test bed origins, methods, and selected accomplishments; and provides a perspective on the future of test beds in our field. Dabbert et al. (2005) provides a useful description of test beds from early in their development and Fig.

No abstract