ID-NAT and serology are complementary in detecting HBV infection in first-time donors, but HBV-DNA is superior to HBsAg detection in repeat donors.

T he implementation of nucleic acid testing (NAT) in blood donations from areas with high or low prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has resulted in the identification of a small number of infections in the preseroconversion window period (WP) 1 and a considerably larger number of blood units containing no detectable hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) but low levels of HBV DNA associated, in most cases, with anti-HBc, suggesting an established infection. These cases were called occult HBV infection (OBI). 2 In Europe, where HBV genotypes A2 and D are prevalent, OBIs are detected in 1:2,000 to 1:20,000 donations 3,4 and are characterized by occurring in older donors (median age 51), mostly males (90%), and with normal levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Viral load is consistently below 1,000 IU/mL (median, 25 IU/mL) and, compared to the dominance of genotype A2 in HBsAg-positive infections, a significantly higher proportion of OBI genotype D is observed. The remarkably high frequency of multiple amino acid substitutions in the pre-S/S proteins (100% in the major hydrophilic region [MHR] of genotype D OBIs) affecting both humoral and cellular epitopes strongly suggested that OBIs in Europe appears, to a large extent, determined by host immune pressure.

Background: Population-level estimates of prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody positivity (seroprevalence) is a crucial epidemiological indicator for tracking the Covid-19 epidemic. Such data are in short supply, both internationally and in South Africa. The South African blood services (the South African National Blood Service, SANBS and the Western Cape Blood Service, WCBS) are coordinating a nationally representative survey of blood donors, which it is hoped can become a cost-effective surveillance method with validity for community-level seroprevalence estimation.Methods: Leveraging existing arrangements, SANBS human research ethics committee permission was obtained to test blood donations collected on predefined days (7th, 10th ,12th ,15th ,20th ,23th and 25th January) for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, using the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay on the cobas e411 platform currently available in the blood services’ donation testing laboratories. Using standard methods, prevalence analysis was done by province, age and race, allowing age to be regarded as either a continuous or categorical variable. Testing was performed in the Eastern Cape (EC), Free State (FS), KwaZulu Natal (ZN) and Northern Cape (NC) provinces.Results: We report on data from 4858 donors - 1457 in EC; 463 in NC; 831 in FS and 2107 in ZN. Prevalence varied substantially across race groups and between provinces, with seroprevalence among Black donors consistently several times higher than among White donors, and the other main population groups (Coloured and Asian) not consistently represented in all provinces. There is no clear evidence that seroprevalence among donors varies by age. Weighted net estimates of prevalence (in the core age range 15-69) by province (compared with official clinically-confirmed COVID-19 case rates in mid-January 2021) are: EC-63%(2.8%), NC-32%(2.2%), FS-46%(2.4%), and ZN-52%(2.4%).Conclusions: Our study demonstrates substantial differences in dissemination of SARS-CoV-2 infection between different race groups, most likely explained by historically based differences in socio-economic status and housing conditions. As has been seen in other areas, even such high seroprevalence does not guarantee population-level immunity against new outbreaks – probably due to viral evolution and waning of antibody neutralization. Despite its limitations, notably a ‘healthy donor’ effect, it seems plausible that these estimates are reasonably generalisable to actual population level anti-SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence, but should be further verified.

ID-NAT in the Western Cape Province of South Africa has contributed significantly to enhancing blood safety, particularly for HBV transmission risk and to a lesser extent for HIV. Anti-HBc testing of NAT nonrepeat reactive donations seems useful in identifying a subgroup of donors with OBI who may be at risk of transmitting HBV.

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is a major cause of acute hepatitis worldwide. This infection causes major water-borne outbreaks in low- and middle-income countries, whilst in industrialised countries this infection is zoonotic. These differences in epidemiology are related to different HEV genotypes. HEV genotype 3 is a zoonotic infection, whilst genotype 2 causes large outbreaks. This study determined the seroprevalence of HEV in blood donors from the Western Cape. Anti-hepatitis A virus (anti-HAV) antibody was detected in 184/300 (61%) donors. Antibody to HEV (anti-HEV) was detected in 78 of 300 donors (26%). It was highest in mixed race donors (62/100), followed by white donors (23/100) and lowest in black donors (19/100) P = 0.019. Since it is thought that genotypes 1 and 2 predominate both viruses would be acquired by the oro-faecal route, it is surprising that HEV seroprevalence does not mirror that of HAV. We postulate that this may reflect differences in socio-economic status and consumption of dietary meat. So the marked divergence between HEV and HAV seroprevalence may be the result of different routes of transmission. Further data are needed to explore the risk factors associated with HEV infection.

Background:Population-level estimates of the prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody positivity (seroprevalence) are crucial epidemiological indicators for tracking the Covid-19 epidemic. Such data are in short supply, both internationally and in South Africa. The South African blood services (the South African National Blood Service, SANBS and the Western Cape Blood Service, WCBS) are coordinating nationwide surveillance of blood donors.Methods:Leveraging existing arrangements, SANBS human research ethics committee permission was obtained to test blood donations collected on predefined days (in January and May 2021) for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, using the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay on the cobas e411 and e801 platforms currently available in the blood services’ donation testing laboratories. Using standard methods, prevalence analysis was done by province, age, time, sex and race.Results:We report on data from 16762 donations. Prevalence varied substantially across race groups and between provinces, with seroprevalence among Black donors consistently several times higher than among White donors, with the other main population groups (Coloured and Asian) not well represented in all provinces. There is no clear evidence that seroprevalence among donors varies by age or sex. The weighted national estimate of prevalence (in the core age range 15-69 years) is 47.4% (95% CI 46.2-48.6). From January to May, we noted a slight but statistically insignificant increase in seroprevalence in those provinces (Gauteng and Free State) where sufficient data were available to make such an estimate.Conclusions:Our study demonstrates substantial differences in dissemination of SARS-CoV-2 infection between different race groups and provinces, in patterns consistent with known differences in historically entrenched socio-economic status and housing conditions. As has been seen in other contexts, even such high seroprevalence does not guarantee population-level immunity against new outbreaks, as evidenced by a substantial third wave that has emerged almost contemporaneously with the end of sampling in this study. The relative importance of various contributions to this resurgence (notably viral evolution, waning of antibody neutralization efficacy, and infection control fatigue) are unclear. Despite its limitations, notably a ‘healthy donor’ effect and the possible waning of detectable antibodies over the time scale of the COVID-19 pandemic, it seems plausible that these estimates are reasonably generalisable to actual population level anti-SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence. The interpretation of occasional seroprevalence surveys as a proxy for total attack rates, over the ever-lengthening pandemic time scale is likely to become ever more complex. More frequent sampling, including linked repeat observations of frequent donors, could substantially improve the utility of blood donor surveillance.

Background: Population-level estimates of the prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody positivity (seroprevalence) are crucial epidemiological indicators for tracking the Covid-19 epidemic. Such data are in short supply, both internationally and in South Africa. The South African blood services (the South African National Blood Service, SANBS and the Western Cape Blood Service, WCBS) are coordinating nationwide surveillance of blood donors. Methods: Leveraging existing arrangements, SANBS human research ethics committee permission was obtained to test blood donations collected on predefined days (in January and May 2021) for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, using the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay on the cobas e411 and e801 platforms currently available in the blood services’ donation testing laboratories. Using standard methods, prevalence analysis was done by province, age, time, sex and race. Results: We report on data from 16762 donations. Prevalence varied substantially across race groups and between provinces, with seroprevalence among Black donors consistently several times higher than among White donors, with the other main population groups (Coloured and Asian) not well represented in all provinces. There is no clear evidence that seroprevalence among donors varies by age or sex. The weighted national estimate of prevalence (in the core age range 15-69 years) is 47.4% (95% CI 46.2-48.6). From January to May, we noted a slight but statistically insignificant increase in seroprevalence in those provinces (Gauteng and Free State) where sufficient data were available to make such an estimate. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates substantial differences in dissemination of SARS-CoV-2 infection between different race groups and provinces, in patterns consistent with known differences in historically entrenched socio-economic status and housing conditions. As has been seen in other contexts, even such high seroprevalence does not guarantee population-level immunity against new outbreaks, as evidenced by a substantial third wave that has emerged almost contemporaneously with the end of sampling in this study. The relative importance of various contributions to this resurgence (notably viral evolution, waning of antibody neutralization efficacy, and infection control fatigue) are unclear. Despite its limitations, notably a ‘healthy donor’ effect and the possible waning of detectable antibodies over the time scale of the COVID-19 pandemic, it seems plausible that these estimates are reasonably generalisable to actual population level antiSARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence. The interpretation of occasional seroprevalence surveys as a proxy for total attack rates, over the ever-lengthening pandemic time scale is likely to become ever more complex. More frequent sampling, including linked repeat observations of frequent donors, could substantially improve the utility of blood donor surveillance.

Background Transfusion-transmitted hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is a potential risk to recipients of blood transfusions. Infection with HEV poses a high risk to immunocompromised recipients with an increased likelihood of developing chronic infection. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of past and active HEV infections in donors from the Western Cape and to identify the risk factors associated with infection. Materials and methods We prospectively tested 10 250 blood donors for HEV infection. A risk factor sub-study investigated 250 donors who completed a questionnaire, and plasma samples were tested for HEV IgG antibodies and pooled for HEV RNA detection. The demographic and risk factors associated with HEV infection were assessed. The molecular study tested 10 000 individual donations using a commercial assay to detect viraemia. HEV viral load and genotype were also determined. Results The overall anti-HEV IgG seroprevalence was 42Á8% (107/250) among donors participating in the risk factor sub-study. The likelihood of past HEV infection was higher with an increase in age. Of the 10 000 donor samples individually tested for HEV RNA, one sample was positive with a viral load of 7Á9 x 10 4 IU/ml and belonged to HEV genotype 3. Conclusion We found a high seroprevalence of anti-HEV IgG but a low HEV RNA prevalence among donors in the Western Cape, South Africa. The study provides evidence for a potential risk of HEV contamination in the blood supply in South Africa. A cost-benefit analysis is needed before considering the introduction of routine donor screening in our setting.