High water production is a major issue in horizontal oil wells, especially in longer laterals, because of the high drawdown from the heel to toe. In addition, the presence of heterogeneity along the lateral section can lead to uneven sweep of hydrocarbons which can result in poor recovery. To control the water production and achieve better sweep efficiency, ICDs have been introduced which balance fluid flux along the producing horizontal well. This paper discusses the feasibility and results of using integrated technologies such as ICDs along with rotary steerable drilling systems (RSS) and azimuthal logging while drilling well placement technology to achieve higher reservoir sweep efficiency. This case study is focused on a Gulf of Mexico (GoM) shelf horizontal well which was completed with prepacked screens. The well was sanded in and plugged after five years of high water production. A saturation log was run in the offset well which granted the viability to revisit this reservoir. Consequently, a new offset horizontal well was proposed and drilled next to the existing well to sweep out remaining reserves. For the new offset well, full field dynamic simulations were performed to evaluate attic placement methodology and optimization of Inflow Control Devices (ICDs) into the integrated design. The results illustrate that attic horizontal well placement is feasible using integrated drilling with ICD technology to maximize the sweep efficiency.
Horizontal and multilateral completions have become increasingly popular as operating companies strive to maximize oil production and minimize the number of wells in Gulf of Mexico (GOM) Shelf. Horizontal oil producers are challenged by gas or water coning that can shorten the well life due to variation in wellbore pressure and reservoir properties from toe to heel. Differences in permeability and/or water saturation, undulations in the wellbore and toe to heel frictional pressure drop can all contribute to early gas or water coning. GOM Shelf sands are predominantly un-consolidated and therefore require appropriate drilling BHAs with placement strategies along with suitable sand control to prevent accumulation in the wellbore and/or erosion of down hole completion components and surface facilities. GOM Shelf sands can contain abundant fines and are non-uniform. The particle size distribution often varies with depth and along the wellbore, thereby making sand control a major challenge.This study descends on an existing GOM Shelf horizontal well that was completed with prepacked screens that sanded in and plugged the well after five years of high water production. A recent reservoir saturation logging run across the reservoir near the toe-end of the lateral granted the viability to revisit this reservoir. Consequently, a new offset horizontal was proposed next to the existing one to sweep out the remaining recoverable reserves. Studies based on existing field data and history match were used to evaluate drilling, well placement, and completion design. Simulations were performed to evaluate attic placement methodology and the inclusion of Inflow Control Devices (ICDs) into the sand control completion and to optimize the integrated design. The results illustrates that attic placement is feasible using azimuthal resistivity measurement with the integration of ICDs to not only delay water coning but also choke back any water that might eventually migrate into the wellbore. Finally, the ICD modeling demonstrates improved sweep efficiency from toe to heel. Both water/gas coning and sand production impose significant risks for lateral well placement and completion design in GOM Shelf especially in horizontal and multilaterals wells. This paper addresses these risks and proposes optimum well placement drilling strategies and completion design to mitigate them.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.