BACKGROUND: The existence of cerebral reperfusion injury in human beings remains controversial. Thus, we aimed to explore the presence of reperfusion injury in acute ischemic stroke patients with recanalization after mechanical thrombectomy and analyzed its impact on neurological outcome. METHODS: We reviewed our prospectively collected database CIPPIS (Comparison Influence to Prognosis of CTP and MRP in AIS Patients, NCT03367286), and enrolled anterior circulation large artery occlusion patients with recanalization after mechanical thrombectomy who underwent (1) computed tomography (CT) perfusion on admission and immediately after recanalization to determine reperfusion region, and (2) CT and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) immediately and 24 hours after recanalization to determine lesion areas. The expansion of lesion between recanalization and 24 hours within reperfusion region was potentially caused by reperfusion, thus termed as radiological observed reperfusion injury (RORI). Based on the imaging modality immediately after recanalization, RORI was further divided into RORI CT and RORI MRI . We first included a small cohort who had performed both CT and MRI immediately after recanalization to validate the consistency between RORI CT and RORI MRI (Study 1). Then the association with RORI CT and poor outcome, defined as 3-month modified Rankin Scale score of 3 to 6, was explored in a larger cohort (Study 2). RESULTS: Study 1 included 23 patients and good consistency was found between RORI CT and RORI MRI (intraclass correlation=0.97, P <0.001). Among 226 patients included in Study 2, a total of 106 (46.9%) were identified with RORI. The ratio of RORI to reperfusion region was 30.1 (16.2, 51.0)% and was independently associated with poor outcome (odds ratio=1.55 per 10% [95% CI‚ 1.30–1.84]; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested that RORI was relatively frequent in stroke patients with recanalization after mechanical thrombectomy and associated with poor outcome despite successful recanalization. Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03367286.
BackgroundTotal joint arthroplasty is associated with significant blood loss and often requires blood transfusion. However, allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) may lead to severe problems, such as immunoreaction and infection. Postoperative autotransfusion, an alternative to ABT, is controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the ability of postoperative autotransfusion to reduce the need for ABT following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA).MethodsSystematic literature searches for randomized controlled trials were performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library until February 2016. Relative risks (RRs) and weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed-effect or random-effect models; we also evaluated publication bias and heterogeneity.ResultsSeventeen trials with a total of 2314 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled RRs of ABT rate between autotransfusion and the regular drainage/no drainage groups for TKA and THA were 0.446 (95% CI = 0.287, 0.693; p < 0.001) and 0.757 (95% CI = 0.599, 0.958; p = 0.020), respectively. In the subgroup analysis performed in TKA patients according to control interventions, the pooled RRs were 0.377 (95% CI = 0.224, 0.634; p < 0.001) (compared with regular drainage) and 0.804 (95% CI = 0.453, 1.426, p = 0.456) (compared with no drainage). In the subgroup analysis performed for THA, the pooled RRs were 0.536 (95% CI = 0.379, 0.757, p < 0.001) (compared with regular drainage) and 1.020 (95% CI = 0.740, 1.405, p = 0.904) (compared with no drainage).ConclusionsCompared to regular drainage, autotransfusion reduces the need for ABT following TKA and THA. This reduction is not present when comparing autotransfusion to no drainage. However, the reliability of the meta-analytic results concerning TKA was limited by significant heterogeneity in methods among the included studies.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1710-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.