Sorafenib in combination with TACE should be considered a safe and effective therapy for advanced HCC. Further validation of the new subgroup of BCLC-C stage is warranted in an independent patient cohort.

Purpose: Lyso-thermosensitive liposomal doxorubicin (LTLD) consists of doxorubicin contained within a heat-sensitive liposome. When heated to !40 C, LTLD locally releases a high concentration of doxorubicin. We aimed to determine whether adding LTLD improves the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesions with a maximum diameter (d max ) of 3 to 7 cm.Experimental Design: The HEAT Study was a randomized, double-blind, dummy-controlled trial of RFA AE LTLD. The 701 enrolled patients had to have 4 unresectable HCC lesions, at least one of which had a d max of 3 to 7 cm. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and a key secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Post hoc subset analyses investigated whether RFA duration was associated with efficacy.Results: The primary endpoint was not met; in intention-totreat analysis, the PFS HR of RFA þ LTLD versus RFA alone was 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79-1.18; P ¼ 0.71], and the OS HR ratio was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.76-1.20; P ¼ 0.67). Among 285 patients with a solitary HCC lesion who received !45 minutes RFA dwell time, the OS HR was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.41-0.96; P < 0.05) in favor of combination therapy. RFA þ LTLD had reversible myelosuppression similar to free doxorubicin.Conclusions: Adding LTLD to RFA was safe but did not increase PFS or OS in the overall study population. However, consistent with LTLD's heat-based mechanism of action, subgroup analysis suggested that RFA þ LTLD efficacy is improved when RFA dwell time for a solitary lesion !45 minutes. Clin Cancer Res; 24(1); 73-83.Ó2017 AACR.

383 Background: The anti–PD-1 antibody pembro showed efficacy and manageable safety in the global phase 2 KEYNOTE-224 and phase 3 KEYNOTE-240 studies of patients (pts) with previously treated advanced HCC, a population of high unmet need. KEYNOTE-394 is a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study conducted in Asia to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembro vs placebo, both given with BSC, as second-line therapy for previously treated advanced HCC (NCT03062358). Methods: Eligible pts in Asia with confirmed advanced HCC and progression on or intolerance to sorafenib or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy were randomized 2:1 to pembro 200 mg or placebo Q3W for ≤35 cycles plus BSC per local guidelines. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints were PFS, ORR, DOR, DCR, and TTP, all assessed per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review, and safety. Treatment differences were assessed using the stratified log-rank test (OS and PFS) or the stratified Miettinen & Nurminen method (ORR). The P value boundary for OS superiority at final analysis (FA) was 0.019307. If OS was superior, PFS and ORR superiority at the second interim analysis (IA2; primary analysis timepoint for these endpoints) could be tested at boundaries of 0.013447 and 0.009139, respectively. Results: 453 pts were randomized to pembro (N = 300) or placebo (N = 153). Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between arms; 90.7% had received sorafenib as first-line therapy. As of the June 30, 2021 cutoff date for FA, median study follow-up was 33.8 mo (range 18.7-49.0). At FA, pembro significantly improved OS vs placebo (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99, P = 0.0180); median (95% CI) OS was 14.6 mo (12.6-18.0) for pembro vs 13.0 mo (10.5-15.1) for placebo and 24-mo OS rate was 34.3% vs 24.9%. At IA2, pembro significantly improved PFS (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60-0.92, P = 0.0032) and ORR (estimated difference 11.4%, 95% CI 6.7-16.0, P = 0.00004); median (95% CI) PFS was 2.6 mo (1.5-2.8) for pembro vs 2.3 mo (1.4-2.8) for placebo, 12-mo PFS rates were 15.9% vs 1.4%, and ORR was 12.7% vs 1.3%. At FA, ORR was 13.7% vs 1.3%, median DOR was 23.9 mo vs 5.6 mo, DCR was 52.7% vs 47.7%, and median TTP was 2.7 mo vs 1.7 mo (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.90). At FA, treatment-related AEs occurred in 66.9% of pts in the pembro arm and 49.7% in the placebo arm, including 14.4% and 5.9% with grade 3-5 events. 3 pts (1.0%) in the pembro arm and 0 in the placebo arm died of treatment-related AEs. Conclusions: Pembro plus BSC significantly improved OS, PFS, and ORR compared with placebo plus BSC as second-line therapy for patients from Asia with advanced HCC. The pembro safety profile was as expected. Overall, results were consistent with those previously observed in KEYNOTE-224 and KEYNOTE-240 and thus add to the body of evidence supporting the use of pembro as second-line therapy for advanced HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03062358.

Combined therapy with Sorafenib-RFA was associated with a lower incidence of post-RFA recurrence and better OS than RFA alone in patients with BCLC Stage 0-B1 HCC. Although these findings suggest that Sorafenib and RFA is safe and effective for the treatment of early HCC, prospective and randomized controlled trials are needed to validate them.

PURPOSE We evaluated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in patients from Asia with previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS In a double-blind, phase III trial, 453 patients with advanced HCC and progression during or after treatment with or intolerance to sorafenib or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive pembrolizumab (200 mg) or placebo once every 3 weeks for ≤ 35 cycles plus best supportive care. The primary end point was overall survival (one-sided significance threshold, P = .0193 [final analysis]). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR; one-sided significance threshold, P = .0134 and .0091, respectively [second interim analysis]; RECIST version 1.1, by blinded independent central review). RESULTS Median overall survival was longer in the pembrolizumab group than in the placebo group (14.6 v 13.0 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.99; P = .0180). Median PFS was also longer in the pembrolizumab group than in the placebo group (2.6 v 2.3 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.92; P = .0032). ORR was greater in the pembrolizumab group (12.7% [95% CI, 9.1 to 17.0]) than in the placebo group (1.3% [95% CI, 0.2 to 4.6]; P < .0001). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 66.9% of patients (grade 3, 12.0%; grade 4, 1.3%; grade 5, 1.0%) in the pembrolizumab group and 49.7% of patients (grade 3, 5.9%; grade 4, 0%; grade 5, 0%) in the placebo group. CONCLUSION In patients from Asia with previously treated advanced HCC, pembrolizumab significantly prolonged overall survival and PFS, and ORR was greater versus placebo.

ObjectivePancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal human malignancies. Gemcitabine is widely used to treat pancreatic cancer, and the resistance to chemotherapy is the major difficulty in treating the disease. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification, which regulates RNA splicing, stability, translocation, and translation, plays critical roles in cancer physiological and pathological processes. METTL14, an m6A Lmethyltransferase, was found deregulated in multiple cancer types. However, its role in gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer remains elusive.MethodsThe mRNA and protein level of m6A modification associated genes were assessed by QRT-PCR and western blotting. Then, gemcitabine‐resistant pancreatic cancer cells were established. The growth of pancreatic cancer cells were analyzed using CCK8 assay and colony formation assay. METTL14 was depleted by using shRNA. The binding of p65 on METTL14 promoter was assessed by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay. Protein level of deoxycytidine kinase (DCK) and cytidine deaminase (CDA) was evaluated by western blotting. In vivo experiments were conducted to further confirm the critical role of METTL14 in gemcitabine resistance.ResultsWe found that gemcitabine treatment significantly increased the expression of m6A methyltransferase METTL14, and METTL14 was up-regulated in gemcitabine-resistance human pancreatic cancer cells. Suppression of METTL14 obviously increased the sensitivity of gemcitabine in resistant cells. Moreover, we identified that transcriptional factor p65 targeted the promoter region of METTL14 and up-regulated its expression, which then increased the expression of cytidine deaminase (CDA), an enzyme inactivates gemcitabine. Furthermore, in vivo experiment showed that depletion of METTL14 rescue the response of resistance cell to gemcitabine in a xenograft model.ConclusionOur study suggested that METTL14 is a potential target for chemotherapy resistance in pancreatic cancer.

506 Background: In LEAP-002 (NCT03713593), len + pembro achieved a median OS of 21.2 mo vs 19.0 mo with len + pbo with manageable safety in both arms in 1L aHCC, although the significance thresholds for OS and PFS were not met. We present here the results of prespecified exploratory patient (pt)-reported outcomes (PROs). Methods: 794 pts were randomized. PROs were assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30, EuroQol-5D5L (EQ5D-5L), and EORTC QLQ-HCC18 questionnaires. Analysis population for HRQoL endpoints included pts who received ≥1 dose of study Tx and completed ≥1 HRQoL assessment. Least squares mean (LSM) score changes from baseline (BL) to wk 27 were compared using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model (covariates: Tx, time, Tx by time interaction, and stratification factors). Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time to deterioration (TTD, time to 1st onset of ≥10 [out of 100] deterioration from BL in a given scale or subscale/confirmed by a 2nd adjacent ≥10 deterioration from BL) for EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)/QoL, physical functioning (PF), and EORTC QLQ-HCC18 abdominal swelling, pain and fatigue, as reported by pts. Stratified Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the magnitude of the Tx difference (HR) between arms in TTD. Results: Compliance with PRO assessments was >91% from BL until wk 27 in both arms. From BL to wk 27, LSM changes in GHS/QoL, PF, role functioning (RF), QLQ-HCC18 functional/domain scores and EQ5D-5L VAS were generally similar between the two arms (Table). Treatment with len + pembro delayed deterioration of patient-reported quality of life vs len + pbo (median TTD, 11.5 vs 4.3 mo; HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65-0.98). LSM score difference (95% CI) was 0.5 (-2.5, 3.4) for GHS/QoL, -1.7 (-4.5, 1.1) for PF, -1.0 (-4.9, 2.9) for RF, 1.0 (-2.2, 4.3) for abdominal swelling, 2.0 (-1.2, 5.2) for fatigue, 2.0 (-1.0, 5.0) for pain, and 0.6 (-2.0, 3.2) for EQ5D-5L VAS. Median TTD in QLQ-C30 PF (5.7 vs 9.1 mo; HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.93-1.41) and QLQ-HCC18 abdominal swelling (NR vs NR; HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.89-1.60) /fatigue (2.9 vs 2.8 mo; HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.81-1.19)/pain (9.6 vs 7.9 mo; HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.75-1.16) was similar between the arms. Conclusions: Len + pembro generally preserved HRQoL vs len + pbo in 1L for aHCC. Combined with efficacy and safety results from LEAP-002, these findings support continued development of len + pembro in HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03713593 . [Table: see text]

Objectives: Intrahepatic recurrence is the major cause of death among patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after curative surgical resection. Several approaches have been reported to decrease the recurrence rate. The objective of our study was to compare the clinical effects of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with interferon-alpha (IFN-α) therapy on recurrence after hepatic resection in patients with HBV-related HCC with that of TACE chemotherapy alone. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data from 228 patients who were diagnosed with HBV-related HCC and underwent curative resection between January 2001 to December 2008. The patients were divided into TACE (n = 126) and TACE-IFN-α (n = 102) groups for postoperative chemotherapy. The TACE regimen consisted of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cisplatin (DDP) , and the emulsion mixed with mitomycin C (MMC) and lipiodol. The recurrence rates, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and risk of recurrence were evaluated. Results: The clinicopathological parameters and adverse effects were similar between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The median OS for the TACE-IFN-α group (36.3 months) was significantly longer than that of the TACE group (24.5 months, P < 0.05). The 3-and 5-year OS for the TACE-IFN-α group were significantly longer than those of the TACE group (P < 0.05) and the recurrence rate was significantly lower (P < 0.05). The TACE and IFN-α combination therapy, active hepatitis HBV infection, the number of tumor nodules, microvascular invasion, liver cirrhosis, and the BCLC stage were independent predictors of OS and DFS. Conclusions: The use of the TACE and IFN-α combination chemotherapy after curative hepatic resection safely and effectively improves OS and decreases recurrence in patients with HBV-related HCC who are at high risk. Our findings can serve as a guide for the selection of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with HBV-related HCC who are at high risk of recurrence.