Background Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) bloodstream infection (BSI) is a common complication in patients with acute leukemia (AL), and the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant strains poses a serious problem. However, there is limited information regarding antibiotic resistance, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of PA BSI in AL patients. This study explored characteristics associated with the clinical outcomes of AL patients with PA BSI and analyzed factors associated with BSI caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) or carbapenem-resistant strains. Methods This single-center retrospective study enrolled hospitalized AL patients who developed PA BSI during January 2014–December 2019. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot survival curves. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were also performed. Results Of 293 eligible patients with PA BSI, 55 (18.8%) received inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy within 48 hours of BSI onset, whereas up to 65.8% MDR-PA BSI patients received inappropriate empirical treatment. The 30-day mortality rate was 8.5% for all patients. However, the 30-day mortality rates were 28.9% and 5.5% in MDR-PA BSI and non–MDR-PA BSI patients, respectively (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, previous use of quinolones (odds ratio [OR], 5.851 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.638–12.975]) and piperacillin/tazobactam (OR, 2.837 [95% CI, 1.151–6.994]) were independently associated with MDR-PA BSI; and MDR-PA BSI (OR, 7.196 [95% CI, 2.773–18.668]), perianal infection (OR, 4.079 [95% CI, 1.401–11.879]), pulmonary infection (OR, 3.028 [95% CI, 1.231–7.446]), and age ≥55 years (OR, 2.871 [95% CI, 1.057–7.799]) were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. Conclusions MDR increases mortality risk in PA BSI patients, and previous antibiotic exposure is important in MDR-PA BSI development. Rational antibiotic use based on local antimicrobial susceptibility and clinical characteristics can help reduce antibiotic resistance and mortality.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of P-ALG (porcine anti-lymphocyte globulin) and R-ATG (rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin) in the conditioning regime for patients with acquired aplastic anemia who underwent HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (halpo-HSCT). Methods A total of 91 patients with acquired aplastic anemia who received haplo-HSCT at our center between January 2014 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-eight patients were in the P-ALG group while sixty-three patients were in the R-ATG group. Results The median time was 11 versus 13 days (P = 0.294) for myeloid engraftment and 12.5 versus 15 days (P = 0.465) for platelet engraftment in the P-ALG and R-ATG groups, respectively. There were no significant difference in 5-year overall survival (74.83% ± 8.24% vs 72.29% ± 6.26%, P = 0.830), GVHD-free, failure-free survival (71.05% ± 8.65% vs 62.71% ± 6.22%, P = 0.662), failure-free survival (74.83% ± 8.24% vs 66.09% ± 5.84%, P = 0.647) and transplantation-related mortality (25.17% ± 8.24% vs 26.29% ± 6.22%, P = 0.708) between the two groups. The incidence of aGVHD (acute graft versus host disease) (65.39% ± 9.33% vs 62.71% ± 6.30%, P = 0.653), II–IV aGVHD (38.46% ± 9.54% vs 35.64% ± 6.24%, P = 0.695), III–IV aGVHD (19.23% ± 7.73% vs 10.53% ± 4.07%, P = 0.291), cGVHD (chronic graft versus host disease) (22.22% ± 12.25% vs 22.31% ± 6.30%, P = 0.915), and moderate to severe cGVHD (5.56% ± 5.40% vs 9.28% ± 4.46%, P = 0.993) were not significantly different. Similar outcomes were observed between the P-ALG and R-ATG groups for severe bacterial infection (17.9% vs 25.4%, P = 0.431), invasive fungal diseases (3.6% vs 9.5%, P = 0.577) and graft rejection (0% vs 9.5%, P = 0.218). However, the incidence of cytomegalovirus infection and Epstein-Barr virus infection was significantly lower in the P-ALG group (46.4% vs 71.4%, P = 0.022; 3.6% vs 25.4%, P = 0.014). Conclusion The efficacy and safety of P-ALG were similar with R-ATG in the setting of haplo-HSCT for patients with acquired aplastic anemia patients. P-ALG could be an alternative for R-ATG.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.