Double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) longer than 30 bp is a key activator of the innate immune response against viral infections. It is widely assumed that the generation of dsRNA during genome replication is a trait shared by all viruses. However, to our knowledge, no study exists in which the production of dsRNA by different viruses is systematically investigated. Here, we investigated the presence and localization of dsRNA in cells infected with a range of viruses, employing a dsRNA-specific antibody for immunofluorescence analysis. Our data revealed that, as predicted, significant amounts of dsRNA can be detected for viruses with a genome consisting of positive-strand RNA, dsRNA, or DNA. Surprisingly, however, no dsRNA signals were detected for negativestrand RNA viruses. Thus, dsRNA is indeed a general feature of most virus groups, but negative-strand RNA viruses appear to be an exception to that rule.

Type III IFNs (IFN-λ/IL-28/29) are cytokines with type I IFN-like antiviral activities, which remain poorly characterized. We herein show that most cell types expressed both types I and III IFNs after TLR stimulation or virus infection, whereas the ability of cells to respond to IFN-λ was restricted to a narrow subset of cells, including plasmacytoid dendritic cells and epithelial cells. To examine the role of type III IFN in antiviral defense, we generated IL-28Rα-deficient mice. These mice were indistinguishable from wild-type mice with respect to clearance of a panel of different viruses, whereas mice lacking the type I IFN receptor (IFNAR−/−) were significantly impaired. However, the strong antiviral activity evoked by treatment of mice with TLR3 or TLR9 agonists was significantly reduced in both IL-28RA−/− and IFNAR−/− mice. The type I IFN receptor system has been shown to mediate positive feedback on IFN-αβ expression, and we found that the type I IFN receptor system also mediates positive feedback on IFN-λ expression, whereas IL-28Rα signaling does not provide feedback on either type I or type III IFN expression in vivo. Finally, using bone-marrow chimeric mice we showed that TLR-activated antiviral defense requires expression of IL-28Rα only on nonhemopoietic cells. In this compartment, epithelial cells responded to IFN-λ and directly restricted virus replication. Our data suggest type III IFN to target a specific subset of cells and to contribute to the antiviral response evoked by TLRs.

IFN-functionally resembles type I IFN, inducing antiviral protection in vitro (10,23,27) as well as in vivo (1). Activation of the IFN-receptor leads to the phosphorylation of STAT1, STAT2, and STAT3 and the formation of the interferon-stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF3) transcription factor (10) and to the induction of typical IFN-induced genes like the OAS and MxA genes. IFN-can reduce cell growth in vitro and possesses antitumor activity in several rodent models (11,25). However, a number of cytokines with very different biological effects activate STAT transcription factors, and pronounced functional differences between type I and type III IFNs exist. The in vivo antiviral activity of IFN-against herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2) has been shown to be comparable to that of IFN-␣ in a systemic model. However, a model for the clinically relevant vaginal HSV-2 infection revealed an antiviral activity of IFN-that surpassed that of IFN-␣ (1).The biological effect of the cytokine-receptor system is determined primarily by three factors: the expression profile of the cytokine itself, the expression profile of the receptor, and the set of target genes for regulation. We decided to start our investigation of the function of the IFN-system by asking which genes are regulated by IFN-. A gene array experiment covering the whole human genome revealed that all IFN--induced genes were also induced by type I IFN. Thus, no genes

Nonspecific effects triggered by small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) complicate the use of RNA interference (RNAi) to specifically downregulate gene expression. To uncover the basis of these nonspecific activities, we analyzed the effect of chemically synthesized siRNAs on mammalian double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-activated signaling pathways. siRNAs ranging from 21 to 27 nucleotides (nt) in length activated the interferon system when they lacked 2-nt 3' overhangs, a characteristic of Dicer products. We show that the recognition of siRNAs is mediated by the RNA helicase RIG-I and that the presence of 3' overhangs impairs its ability to unwind the dsRNA substrate and activate downstream signaling to the transcription factor IRF-3. These results suggest a structural basis for discrimination between microRNAs that are endogenous Dicer products, and nonself dsRNAs such as by-products of viral replication. These findings will enable the rational design of siRNAs that avoid nonspecific effects or, alternatively, that induce bystander effects to potentially increase the efficacy of siRNA-based treatments of viral infections or cancer.

Type III interferons (IFNs) or IFN-λs regulate a similar set of genes as type I IFNs, but whereas type I IFNs act globally, IFN-λs primarily target mucosal epithelial cells and protect them against the frequent viral attacks that are typical for barrier tissues. IFN-λs thereby help to maintain healthy mucosal surfaces through immune protection, without the significant immune-related pathogenic risk associated with type I IFN responses. Type III IFNs also target the human liver, with dual effects: they induce an antiviral state in hepatocytes, but specific IFN-λ4 action impairs the clearance of hepatitis C virus and could influence inflammatory responses. This constitutes a paradox that has yet to be resolved.

The recently emerged severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the causative agent of the devastating COVID-19 lung disease pandemic. Here, we tested the inhibitory activities of the antiviral interferons of type I (IFN-alpha) and type III (IFN-lambda) against SARS-CoV-2 and compared them with those against SARS-CoV-1, which emerged in 2003. Using two mammalian epithelial cell lines (human Calu-3 and simian Vero E6), we found that both IFNs dose-dependently inhibit SARS-CoV-2. In contrast, SARS-CoV-1 was restricted only by IFN-alpha in these cell lines. SARS-CoV-2 generally exhibited a broader IFN sensitivity than SARS-CoV-1. Moreover, ruxolitinib, an inhibitor of IFN-triggered Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling, boosted SARS-CoV-2 replication in the IFN-competent Calu-3 cells. We conclude that SARS-CoV-2 is sensitive to exogenously added IFNs. This finding suggests that type I and especially the less adverse effect–prone type III IFN are good candidates for the management of COVID-19.

Excessive cytokine signaling frequently exacerbates lung tissue damage during respiratory viral infection. Type I (IFN-α/β) and III (IFN-λ) interferons are host-produced antiviral cytokines. Prolonged IFN-α/β responses can lead to harmful proinflammatory effects, whereas IFN-λ mainly signals in epithelia, inducing localized antiviral immunity. Here we show that IFN signaling interferes with lung repair during influenza recovery, with IFN-λ driving these effects most potently. IFN-induced p53 directly reduces epithelial proliferation and differentiation, increasing disease severity, and susceptibility to bacterial superinfections. Thus, excessive or prolonged IFN-production aggravates viral infection by impairing lung epithelial regeneration. Therefore, timing and duration are critical parameters of endogenous IFN action and should be considered carefully for IFN therapeutic strategies against viral infections like influenza and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

The recent emergence of a novel human coronavirus (HCoV-EMC) in the Middle East raised considerable concerns, as it is associated with severe acute pneumonia, renal failure, and fatal outcome and thus resembles the clinical presentation of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) observed in 2002 and 2003. Like SARS-CoV, HCoV-EMC is of zoonotic origin and closely related to bat coronaviruses. The human airway epithelium (HAE) represents the entry point and primary target tissue for respiratory viruses and is highly relevant for assessing the zoonotic potential of emerging respiratory viruses, such as HCoV-EMC. Here, we show that pseudostratified HAE cultures derived from different donors are highly permissive to HCoV-EMC infection, and by using reverse transcription (RT)-PCR and RNAseq data, we experimentally determined the identity of seven HCoV-EMC subgenomic mRNAs. Although the HAE cells were readily responsive to type I and type III interferon (IFN), we observed neither a pronounced inflammatory cytokine nor any detectable IFN responses following HCoV-EMC, SARS-CoV, or HCoV-229E infection, suggesting that innate immune evasion mechanisms and putative IFN antagonists of HCoV-EMC are operational in the new host. Importantly, however, we demonstrate that both type I and type III IFN can efficiently reduce HCoV-EMC replication in HAE cultures, providing a possible treatment option in cases of suspected HCoV-EMC infection.