Background: Controversy remains over the choice of anaesthetic technique for patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture. Aim: The aim was to compare the risk of complication of neuraxial anaesthesia with that of general anaesthesia in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Methods: This systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines and was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022337384). The study included eligible randomised controlled trials published before February 2022. Data synthesis was performed to compare the differences between general and neuraxial anaesthesia. Meta-regression analysis was performed to investigate the influence of the publication year. A subgroup analysis was performed based on patient age and the anaesthetic technique used. A grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluations assessment was performed to assess the quality of each outcome. Results: Twenty randomised controlled trials and 4802 patients were included. Data synthesis revealed significant higher risk of acute kidney injury in the general anaesthesia group (P=0.01). There were no significant differences between the two techniques in postoperative short-term mortality (P=0.34), delirium (P=0.40), postoperative nausea and vomiting (P=0.40), cardiac infarction (P=0.31), acute heart failure (P=0.34), pulmonary embolism (P=0.24) and pneumonia (P=0.15). Subgroup analysis based on patient age and use of sedative medication did not reveal any significant differences. Meta-regression analysis of the publication year versus each adverse event revealed no statistically significant differences. Conclusion: A significantly higher risk of postoperative acute kidney injury was found in patients receiving general anaesthesia. This study revealed no significant differences in terms of postoperative mortality and other complications between general and neuraxial anaesthesia. The results were consistent across the age groups.

BackgroundAccurate preoperative planning is essential for successful total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the requirements of time, manpower, and complex workflow for accurate planning have limited its application. This study aims to develop a comprehensive artificial intelligent preoperative planning system for THA (AIHIP) and validate its accuracy in clinical performance.MethodsOver 1.2 million CT images from 3,000 patients were included to develop an artificial intelligence preoperative planning system (AIHIP). Deep learning algorithms were developed to facilitate automatic image segmentation, image correction, recognition of preoperative deformities and postoperative simulations. A prospective study including 120 patients was conducted to validate the accuracy, clinical outcome and radiographic outcome.ResultsThe comprehensive workflow was integrated into the AIHIP software. Deep learning algorithms achieved an optimal Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.973 and loss of 0.012 at an average time of 1.86 ± 0.12 min for each case, compared with 185.40 ± 21.76 min for the manual workflow. In clinical validation, AIHIP was significantly more accurate than X-ray-based planning in predicting the component size with more high offset stems used.ConclusionThe use of AIHIP significantly reduced the time and manpower required to conduct detailed preoperative plans while being more accurate than traditional planning method. It has potential in assisting surgeons, especially beginners facing the fast-growing need for total hip arthroplasty with easy accessibility.

Objective This study aims to compare the accuracy of CT‐based preoperative planning with that of acetate templating in predicting implant size, neck length, and neck cut length, and to evaluate the reproducibility of the two methods. Methods This prospective study was conducted between August 2020 and March 2021. Patients who underwent elective primary total hip arthroplasty by a single surgeon were assessed for eligibility. The included patients underwent both acetate templating and CT‐based planning by two observers after the operation. Each observer conducted both acetate templating and CT‐based planning twice for each case. The outcome measures included the following: (1) the accuracy of surgical planning in predicting implant size, calcar length, and neck length, which was defined as the difference between the planned size and length and the actual size and length; (2) reproducibility of the two planning techniques, which were assessed by inter‐observer and intra‐observer reliability analysis; (3) the influence of potential confounding factors on planning accuracy, which was evaluated using generalized estimating equations. Results A total of 57 cases were included in the study. CT‐based planning was more accurate than acetate templating for predicting cup size (93% vs 79%, p < 0.001) and stem size (93% vs 75%, p < 0.001). When assessed by mean absolute difference, the comparison between acetate templating and CT‐based planning was 4.28 mm vs 3.74 mm (p = 0.122) in predicting neck length and 3.05 mm vs 2.93 mm (p = 0.731) in predicting neck cut length. In the inter‐observer reliability analysis, an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.790 was achieved for predicting cup size, and an ICC of 0.966 was achieved for predicting stem size using CT‐based planning. In terms of intra‐observer reliability, Observer 1 achieved an ICC of 0.803 for predicting cup size and 0.965 for predicting stem size in CT‐based planning. Observer 2 achieved ICC values of 0.727 and 0.959 for predicting cup and stem sizes, respectively. The average planning time was 6.48 ± 1.55 min for CT‐based planning and 6.12 ± 1.40 min for acetate templating (p = 0.015). Conclusion The CT‐based planning system is more accurate than acetate templating for predicting implant size and has good reproducibility in total hip arthroplasty.

Introduction The number of patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome (PSS) requiring total hip arthroplasty (THA) is expected to increase, but few studies have detailed their outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a THA cohort of patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head (ANFH) who had PSS and to compare their outcomes with those of matched patients with osteoarthritis. Method A case–control study using data from a single-institution arthroplasty registry was performed. Forty-two THAs in 32 patients undergoing THA with a diagnosis of PSS were identified and were matched with 84 THAs in 64 patients with osteoarthritis (1:2 ratio). Functional and health-related quality of life (QoL) evaluations were performed, and complications were recorded at the last follow-up. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with reaching the transfusion trigger of hemoglobin < 8 g/dL (TT8) in PSS patients. Results After a mean 5-year follow-up, both cohorts had similar hip function and health-related QoL outcomes. The incision complications and reaching TT8 were greater in the PSS group. No differences were observed in the rate of 90-day readmission, reoperation, or overall revision. By multivariate analysis, the influencing factors for reaching TT8 in PSS patients were lower preoperative hemoglobin ( OR = 0.842, 95% CI [0.741–0.958], P < 0.05). Conclusion Our study demonstrated PSS patients who received THA due to ANFH could achieve clinical outcomes similar to those of non-PSS patients. Improving preoperative Hb level can reduce the risk of transfusion. Key Points • THA significantly improved hip function and health-related quality of life in PSS patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. • Patients with PSS were more likely to reach the transfusion trigger and higher rates of incision complications after THA. • Improving preoperative Hb level can reduce the risk of transfusion for PSS patients who underwent THA. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10067-022-06256-2.

No abstract