BackgroundSpinal tuberculosis (STB) is a significant public health concern, especially in elderly patients, due to its chronic and debilitating nature. Nutritional status is a critical factor affecting the prognosis of STB patients. The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) has been established as a reliable predictor of adverse outcomes in various diseases, but its correlation with surgical outcomes in elderly STB patients has not been studied.ObjectiveThe study aimed to assess the prognostic value of the GNRI in elderly patients with STB who underwent surgery.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records of elderly patients (65 years or older) diagnosed with active STB who underwent surgical treatment. Data collection included patient demographics, comorbidities, clinical history, laboratory testing, and surgical factors. GNRI was calculated using serum albumin levels and body weight. Postoperative complications were observed and recorded. The patients were followed up for at least 1 year, and their clinical cure status was assessed based on predefined criteria.ResultsA total of 91 patients were included in the study. We found that a GNRI value of <98.63 g/dL was a cutoff value for predicting unfavorable clinical prognosis in elderly STB patients undergoing surgery. Patients with a low GNRI had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, were more likely to receive red blood cell transfusions, and had a higher prevalence of overall complications, particularly pneumonia. The unfavorable clinical prognosis group had lower GNRI scores compared to the favorable prognosis group. Multivariate analysis showed that lower GNRI independently predicted unfavorable clinical outcomes in elderly STB patients.ConclusionThe study concluded that the GNRI is a valuable biomarker for predicting prognosis in elderly STB patients undergoing surgical intervention. Patients with lower GNRI scores had worse outcomes and a higher incidence of complications.
In this letter to the editor, we discuss the article by Zhang et al., published recently in the Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. The authors reviewed the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma combined with hyaluronic acid versus platelet-rich plasma alone for knee osteoarthritis. Whether the authors' purpose in grouping was to investigate the role of hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis is a question we would like to raise. In terms of the methodology of the study, combining randomized controlled trials with cohort studies in this meta-analysis is a methodological error. Secondly, the study methodology of the four included randomized controlled trial studies lacked a clear method of randomization. In addition to this, the completeness of the search needs to be taken into consideration. Some of the results of this study were highly heterogeneous, and no sensitivity analysis or meta-regression was performed to further analyse the sources of heterogeneity. The above issues will affect the conclusions of the article, and we believe this needs further improvement and discussion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.