We estimated the effects of the implementation of travel restrictions on air pollution. • We tested human mobility as one potential mechanism underlying this effect. • We utilized long dynamic panel data models using data from 44 cities in north China. • The concentrations of SO 2 , PM 2.5 , PM 10 , NO 2 , and CO decreased by 6.76%, 5.93%, 13.66%, 24.67%, and 4.58%, respectively. • Human mobility dropped by 69.85% after governments implemented travel bans.
The outbreak of COVID-19 continues to bring unprecedented shock to mankind's socioeconomic activities, and to the wider environment. China, as the early epicenter of the pandemic, locked down one-third of its cities in an attempt to prevent the rapid spread of the virus. Human migration patterns have subsequently been radically altered and many regions have seen perceived improvements in air quality during the lockdowns. This study empirically examines the relationship between human migration and air pollution and further evaluates the causal impacts of the lockdowns. A spatial econometric method and a spatial explicit counterfactual framework are employed in this study. The key findings are as follows: i) a considerable amount of variation in AQI, PM
10
, PM
2.5
, and NO
2
concentration can be explained by human migration but we fail to find suggestive evidence in the cases of SO
2
and CO; ii) the implementation of lockdown measures led to a significant reduction in AQI (18.1%), PM
2.5
(22.2%), NO
2
(20.5%), and PM
10
(10.7%), but has no meaningful impacts on SO
2,
CO and O
3
levels; iii) further analysis indicates that the impacts of lockdown policies varied by control stringency and by regional heterogeneity. Our findings are of great importance for the Chinese government to create a stronger and more coherent framework in its efforts to tackle air pollution.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.