BackgroundThe state of Florida continues to report significant gender, ethnic and racial disparities in trauma incidence, access to care and outcomes in the adult population. Our objective was to assess pediatric injury profiles and ethnic/racial disparities of specific injuries in a Regional Trauma Center (TC) in South Florida.MethodsRetrospective data from November 2011 to December 2015 were obtained from the Level 2 TC registry for children ≤21 years old. Demographic, injury pattern, geographic area, injury scores and treatment data were analyzed.ResultsOne thousand six hundred ten patients, ages 0–21 years were cared for at the TC from 2011 to 2015.73% were males. Mean age = 15.7 years. Mortality was 2.3%. Using zip code data and using geographic mapping, we identified two main clusters where injuries were occurring. A multinomial regression analysis demonstrated that Hispanics had higher risks of falls (RR 10.4, 95% CI 2.7–29), motorcycle accidents (RR 3.7, 95% CI 1.7–8.2) and motor vehicle accidents (RR 6.4, 95% CI 3.6–11.4). Black/African American children had higher risks of gunshot wounds and resultant mortality (p < 0.01).ConclusionThere were racial, ethnic and gender disparities in the patterns of injury and outcomes among the youth attended at our TC. Geographic mapping allowed us the identification of the zones in South Florida where injuries were occurring. Understanding the differences and using geographic mapping to identify regions of higher prevalence will complement planning for prevention programs.
Objectives: The frequency and magnitude of depictions of risky events and unintentional injuries in top ranked children's animated and live action television programs was assessed. Methods: Qualitative and quantitative media content analysis were used. Scenes from television episodes were examined for the depiction of risky events and unintentional injuries. Results: A total of 201 actual and potential injury related events were tabulated in 99 episodes aired in 2003 and 2004. Only 26% of the risky events depicted led to an injury or physical consequence. More than 80% of the events involved behavioral or environmental risk factors. Safety factors were not present in over 90% of risky events depicted. The general tone and context of events was humor or indifference rather than concern or action, with little or no relevance to the plot. Conclusion: Unintentional injuries are the leading cause of death and disability for children, yet animated and live action television programs marketed to children continue to portray injury risk inaccurately. Working with the children's television production industry to improve injury depiction is a much needed advocacy activity.
Teaching status/academic ranking may play a role in the variations in trauma center (TC) outcomes. Our study aimed to determine the relationship between TC teaching status and injury-adjusted, all-cause mortality in a national sampling. Retrospective review of the National Sample Program (NSP) from the National Trauma Data bank (NTDB). TCs were categorized based on teaching status. Adjusted mortality was determined by observed/expected (O/E) mortality ratios, derived using TRauma Injury Severity Score methodology from the Injury Severity Score and Revised Trauma Score. Chi-square and t test analyses were utilized with a statistical significance defined as P <.05. Of the 94 TCs in the NSP, 46 were university, 38 were community teaching, and 10 were community nonteaching. For the University TCs, 62.8% were American College of Surgeons (ACS) level 1 and 81.2% state level 1. Of the community teaching TCs, 39.0% was ACS level 1 and 35.1% was state level 1. Of the community nonteaching TCs, 0% was ACS level 1 and 11.1% was state level 1. University TCs had a significantly higher O/E mortality rate than community teaching (0.75 vs 0.71; P = .04). There were no differences in O/E between community teaching and nonteaching TCs (0.71 vs 0.70; P = .70). Community teaching and nonteaching TCs have lower injury-adjusted, all-cause mortality rates than University Centers. Future studies should further investigate key differences between University TCs and community teaching TC to evaluate possible quality and performance improvement measures.
The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Committee on Trauma (COT) verification and State designation of trauma centers (TCs) into Level 1 or 2 establishes a distinction based on resources, trauma volume, and educational commitment. The ACS COT and individual states each verify TCs to differentiate performance levels. We aim to determine the relationship between ACS and State Level 1 versus 2, and injury-adjusted, all-cause mortality in a national sampling. TCs were identified by review of the National Sample Program (NSP) from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB)—the largest validated trauma database in the nation—of the year 2013. TCs were categorized by ACS or State Level 1 or 2 status, all others were excluded. Adjusted mortality was determined using observed/expected mortality (O/E) ratios, derived by trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) methodology. Chi-squared and t test analyses were used for categorical variables, with a statistical significance defined as P -value <.05. Of the 94 TCs in the NSP, 67 had ACS and 80 had State designations. There were 38 ACS Level 1 TCs and 29 ACS Level 2. For State designations, there were 45 as State Level 1 and 35 State Level 2. ACS Level 1 TCs had a similar O/E compared with ACS Level 2 verified centers (0.73 vs 0.75, chi-square, P = .36). Level 1 TCs designated by their state, had a similar O/E compared with State Level 2 centers (0.70 vs 0.74, chi-square, P = .08). Both ACS and State Level 1 and 2 trauma centers performed similarly on injury adjusted, all-cause mortality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.