This paper presents a comparison study between 10 automatic and six interactive methods for liver segmentation from contrast-enhanced CT images. It is based on results from the "MICCAI 2007 Grand Challenge" workshop, where 16 teams evaluated their algorithms on a common database. A collection of 20 clinical images with reference segmentations was provided to train and tune algorithms in advance. Participants were also allowed to use additional proprietary training data for that purpose. All teams then had to apply their methods to 10 test datasets and submit the obtained results. Employed algorithms include statistical shape models, atlas registration, level-sets, graph-cuts and rule-based systems. All results were compared to reference segmentations five error measures that highlight different aspects of segmentation accuracy. All measures were combined according to a specific scoring system relating the obtained values to human expert variability. In general, interactive methods reached higher average scores than automatic approaches and featured a better consistency of segmentation quality. However, the best automatic methods (mainly based on statistical shape models with some additional free deformation) could compete well on the majority of test images. The study provides an insight in performance of different segmentation approaches under real-world conditions and highlights achievements and limitations of current image analysis techniques.

Research studies have shown that advances in computed tomography (CT) technology allow better detection of pulmonary nodules by generating higher-resolution images. However, the new technology also generates many more individual transversal reconstructions, which as a result may affect the efficiency and accuracy of the radiologists interpreting these images.The goal of our research study is to build a content-based image retrieval (CBIR) system for pulmonary CT nodules. Currently, texture is used to quantify the image content, but any other image feature could be incorporated into the proposed system. Unfortunately, there is no texture model or similarity measure known to work best for encoding nodule texture properties or retrieving most similar nodules. Therefore, we investigated and evaluated several texture models and similarity measures with respect to nodule size, number of retrieved nodules, and radiologist agreement on the nodules' texture characteristic.The results were generated on 90 thoracic CT scans collected by the Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC). Every case was annotated by up to four radiologists marking the contour of nodules and assigning nine characteristics (including texture) to each identified nodule. We found that Gabor texture descriptors produce the best retrieval results regardless of the nodule size, number of retrieved items or similarity metric. Furthermore, when analyzing the radiologists' agreement on the texture characteristic, we found that when just two radiologists agreed, the average precision increased from 88% to 96% for both Gabor and Markov texture features. Moreover, once three or four radiologists agreed the precision increased to nearly 100%.

Automatic liver segmentation from abdominal computed tomography (CT) images based on gray levels or shape alone is difficult because of the overlap in gray-level ranges and the variation in position and shape of the soft tissues. To address these issues, we propose an automatic liver segmentation method that utilizes low-level features based on texture information; this texture information is expected to be homogenous and consistent across multiple slices for the same organ. Our proposed approach consists of the following steps: first, we perform pixel-level texture extraction; second, we generate liver probability images using a binary classification approach; third, we apply a split-and-merge algorithm to detect the seed set with the highest probability area; and fourth, we apply to the seed set a region growing algorithm iteratively to refine the liver's boundary and get the final segmentation results. Furthermore, we compare the segmentation results from three different texture extraction methods (Co-occurrence Matrices, Gabor filters, and Markov Random Fields (MRF)) to find the texture method that generates the best liver segmentation. From our experimental results, we found that the co-occurrence model led to the best segmentation, while the Gabor model led to the worst liver segmentation. Moreover, co-occurrence texture features alone produced approximately the same segmentation results as those produced when all the texture features from the combined co-occurrence, Gabor, and MRF models were used. Therefore, in addition to providing an automatic model for liver segmentation, we also conclude that Haralick co-occurrence texture features are the most significant texture characteristics in distinguishing the liver tissue in CT scans.

In this paper, we propose a hybrid approach for automatic single-organ

No abstract