Trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) and urea represent the extremes among the naturally occurring organic osmolytes in terms of their ability to stabilize/destabilize proteins. Their mixtures are found in nature and have generated interest in terms of both their physiological role and their potential use as additives in various applications (crystallography, drug formulation, etc.). Here we report experimental density and activity coefficient data for aqueous mixtures of TMAO with urea. From these data we derive the thermodynamics and solvation properties of the osmolytes, using Kirkwood–Buff theory. Strong hydrogen-bonding at the TMAO oxygen, combined with volume exclusion, accounts for the thermodynamics and solvation of TMAO in aqueous urea. As a result, TMAO behaves in a manner that is surprisingly similar to that of hard-spheres. There are two mandatory solvation sites. In plain water, these sites are occupied with water molecules, which are seamlessly replaced by urea, in proportion to its volume fraction. We discuss how this result gives an explanation both for the exceptionally strong exclusion of TMAO from peptide groups and for the experimentally observed synergy between urea and TMAO.

No abstract

The kidney uses mixtures of five osmolytes to counter the stress induced by high urea and NaCl concentrations. The individual roles of most of the osmolytes are unclear, and three of the five have not yet been thermodynamically characterized. Here, we report partial molar volumes and activity coefficients of glycerophosphocholine (GPC), taurine, and myo-inositol. We derive their solvation behavior from the experimental data using Kirkwood-Buff theory. We also provide their solubility data, including solubility data for scyllo-inositol. It turns out that renal osmolytes fall into three distinct classes with respect to their solvation. Trimethyl-amines (GPC and glycine-betaine) are characterized by strong hard-sphere-like self-exclusion; urea, taurine, and myo-inositol have a tendency toward self-association; sorbitol and most other nonrenal osmolytes have a relatively constant, intermediate solvation that has components of both exclusion and association. The data presented here show that renal osmolytes are quite diverse with respect to their solvation patterns, and they can be further differentiated based on observations from experiments examining their effect on macromolecules. It is expected, based on the available surface groups, that each renal osmolyte has distinct effects on various classes of biomolecules. This likely allows the kidney to use specific combinations of osmolytes independently to fine-tune the chemical activities of several types of molecules.