The use of flap closure in irradiated patients is associated with fewer perineal complications and a shorter hospital stay.

Breast reconstruction with a transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap plus an implant has been proposed as an option for women with a thin body habitus who do not have sufficient abdominal tissue to permit reconstruction with a TRAM flap alone. The standard autologous tissue reconstructive procedure in these women is a combined latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap and breast implant. We reviewed our experience performing TRAM flap/implant and latissimus dorsi flap/implant breast reconstruction to compare complication rates and aesthetic outcomes between these two types of reconstruction. Between 1992 and 1999, 88 breasts were reconstructed at our institution using an autologous tissue flap combined with a breast implant (44 with a TRAM flap/implant and 44 with a latissimus dorsi flap/implant). Recipient-site and donor-site complications for the two procedures were compared using Fisher's exact test; a panel of unbiased, blinded judges compared the aesthetic outcomes. The recipient-site complication rate was lower for the TRAM flap/implant group than for the latissimus dorsi flap/implant group (18 percent versus 34 percent, p = 0.09). Most recipient-site complications in the TRAM flap/implant group were related to fluid collection around the implant. In the TRAM flap/implant group, complications occurred in 37 percent of the reconstructions that had immediate implant placement and in none of the reconstructions with delayed implant placement (p = 0.01). In the TRAM flap/implant reconstructions with immediate implant placement, the recipient-site complication rate was 50 percent when implants were completely filled with saline, but no complications occurred with incompletely filled, postoperatively adjustable implants (p = 0.03). No microvascular complications occurred with immediate placement of breast implants under TRAM flaps. Donor-site complications included a hematoma, a seroma, and an umbilical necrosis in the TRAM flap/implant group and six cases of seroma formation in the latissimus dorsi flap/implant group. The comparison of aesthetic outcome was statistically significant for the TRAM flap/implant group, which had a higher overall mean score than the latissimus dorsi flap/implant group did (3.29 versus 2.85, p = 0.01). The results of this study suggest that the TRAM flap/implant breast reconstruction should be considered as an alternative to the latissimus dorsi flap/implant breast reconstruction in women with a thin body habitus.

No abstract

No abstract

The implementation of the National Institute of Clinical Excellence improving outcome guidelines (NICE-IOG) manual for head and neck cancer may have a huge potential cost implication. Head and neck cancer is a rare disease which utilises large quantities of resources which can only be provided in a tertiary centre. Head and neck cancer services should be centralised into a single site for each cancer network. A new higher tariff rate for complex head and neck cancer cases is needed which recognises the true cost of this work. Each network should set its own tariff to make head and neck cancer care financially viable.

In cases of unilateral breast reconstruction with a transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap, poorly perfused tissue, which is normally excised to avoid subsequent fat necrosis, must sometimes be used to achieve adequate breast size and projection. In such cases, incorporation of a second vascular pedicle into the flap design improves perfusion. The authors retrospectively examined their experience with bipedicled TRAM flap-based unilateral breast reconstruction to determine whether the use of microsurgical rather than conventional (nonmicrosurgical) techniques for flap transfer resulted in lower incidences of flap-site fat necrosis and donor-site hernia/bulge. The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction with a bipedicled TRAM or deep inferior epigastric perforator flap between January of 1991 and March of 2001. Group 1 consisted of patients who had undergone flap transfer using a conventional technique for both pedicles; group 2, patients who had flap transfer using a conventional technique for one pedicle and a microsurgical technique for the other; and group 3, patients who had flap transfer using a microsurgical technique for both pedicles. Of the 863 patients identified, 72 (8.3 percent) had undergone reconstruction using a bipedicled flap. There were 43 patients in group 1, 24 patients in group 2, and five patients in group 3. Only one case of total flap loss had occurred (group 1). Partial flap loss occurred in two patients in group 1 (5 percent) and three patients in group 2 (13 percent). Fat necrosis occurred more frequently in groups 1 (23 percent) and 2 (29 percent) than in group 3 (0 percent) (p = 0.5, Fisher's exact test). Similarly, bulge or hernia was more common in groups 1 (12 percent) and 2 (4 percent) than in group 3 (0 percent) (p = 0.6, Fisher's exact test). In this study, patients who received a bipedicled TRAM flap using microsurgical techniques alone (group 3) appeared to have better flap perfusion and less frequent hernia/bulge than did patients who underwent flap transfer using conventional (group 1) or combined techniques (group 2). However, these differences were not statistically significant, and this trend must be verified in a larger study.

Iliofemoral and femorofemoral crossover bypass operations performed over a 6-year period were reviewed. A total of 226 patients underwent 231 operations from 1984 to 1990. Seventy-two patients had 75 iliofemoral grafts and 154 patients had 156 femorofemoral grafts. The early mortality rate was 6 per cent for the iliofemoral group and 1.3 per cent for femorofemoral reconstruction. There was a higher reoperation rate in the iliofemoral group (31 versus 16.0 per cent). The cumulative patency rate at 6 years was 75 per cent for iliofemoral bypass and 92 per cent for the femorofemoral procedure (P < 0.01), while the survival rates for the same period were 55 and 74 per cent respectively (P < 0.01). Hospital stay was significantly shorter for patients undergoing femorofemoral bypass (P < 0.05).

Subtotal colectomy with preservation of the rectum is now the procedure of choice for patients with severe colitis requiring emergency surgery. The use of subcutaneous 'rectal closure' when the retained distal bowel is placed at the caudal end of the abdominal incision in the subcutaneous or fascial layer is studied. An anal catheter may be placed to drain the rectum. Thirty-two patients (14 men, 18 women) of mean age 33 (range 17-77) years with severe inflammatory bowel disease (29 ulcerative colitis, one Crohn's disease, one indeterminate colitis, one Campylobacter colitis) underwent emergency colectomy with subcutaneous rectal stump closure. Twenty-three stumps were closed with staples, four sutured and five by both staples and sutures. Complications developed in seven patients (22 per cent), of which two required surgical intervention. One significant wound infection was treated successfully with a course of antibiotics. Three minor wound infections did not require specific treatment. The rectal stump was always readily located at the time of restorative surgery. This technique is recommended as a simple and safe alternative to an open mucus fistula provided that surgeons adhere to standard surgical principles; in particular the distal bowel should not be brought out into the wound under tension.