The effect of the trace metal cobalt on the conversion of methanol in an upflow anaerobic sludge bed (UASB) reactor was investigated by studying the effect of cobalt deprivation from the influent on the reactor efficiency and the sludge characteristics. A UASB reactor (30 degrees C; pH 7) was operated for 261 days at a 12-h hydraulic retention time (HRT). The loading rate was increased stepwise from 2.6 g chemical oxygen demand (COD) x L reactor(-1) x d(-1) to 7.8 g COD x L reactor(-1) x d(-1). Cobalt deprivation had a strong impact on the methanogenic activity of the sludge. In batch tests, the methanogenic activity of the sludge with methanol as the substrate increased 5.3 (day 28) and 2.1 (day 257) times by addition of 840 nM of cobalt. The sludge had an apparent K(m) for cobalt of 948 nM after 28 days of operation and 442 nM at the end of the run. Cobalt deprivation during 54 days of operation led to a methanol conversion efficiency of only 55%. Continuous addition of cobalt (330 nM) for 33 days improved the methanol removal efficiency to 100%. In this period of cobalt dosing, the cobalt concentration in the sludge increased 2.7 times up to 32 microg x g TSS(-1). Upon omission of the cobalt addition, cobalt washed-out at a stable rate of 0.1 microg x g VSS(-1) x d(-1). At the end of the run, the cobalt concentration of the sludge was similar to that of the seed sludge.

No abstract

No abstract

The effect of omitting nickel from the influent on methanol conversion in an Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Bed (UASB) reactor was investigated. The UASB reactor (30 degrees C, pH 7) was operated for 261 days at a 12-h hydraulic retention time (HRT) and at organic loading rates (OLRs) ranging from 2.6 to 7.8 g COD l reactor(-1) day(-1). The nickel content of the sludge decreased by 66% during the 261-day reactor run because of washout and doubling of the sludge bed volume. Nickel deprivation initially had a strong impact on the methanogenic activity of the sludge with methanol; e.g., after 89 days of operation, this activity was doubled by adding 2 micro M nickel. Upon prolonged UASB reactor operation, methanol and VFA effluent concentrations decreased whereas the sludge lost its response to nickel addition in activity tests. This suggests that a less nickel-dependent methanol-converting sludge had developed in the UASB reactor.

Wastewater from an Akzo Nobel production site contains more than 50 g/l total dissolved salts, mainly chlorides and sulphates, and is currently being treated after 10-20 x dilution. Biological treatment of undiluted or less diluted wastewater is very desirable for environmental and economic reasons. Possibilities were investigated in laboratory scale reactors to treat this highly saline and high strength wastewater aerobically, either after long adaptation or after removing part of the salts by a pretreatment. Adaptation and selection from mixed activated sludge populations took approximately 40 days to finally achieve a COD removal in aerobic treatment of 55-65% at two times dilution (11-16 g/l chloride and 5-7 g/l sulphate). Undiluted wastewater was not treatable. A higher removal percentage (> 80%) was possible at the original high salt concentration only when the sludge load was limited to approximately 0.4-0.5 kg COD/kg sludge/day. A longer adaptation time was required. Nanofiltration (NF) and crystallization could be used as a pretreatment to remove and recover up to 80% of the sulphate in the form of crystallized Glauber salt. Recovery strongly depended on the sulphate and chloride concentration in the NF concentrate and on crystallization temperature. The salt (sulphate) reduction through the NF improved the removal efficiency of a consecutive biotreatment only at a relatively low chloride level, demonstrating that the combination of nanofiltration-crystallization-aerobic biodegradation is less feasible for very saline wastewaters. Anaerobic pretreatment of saline waters turned out to be rather sensitive to high salinities. Only wastewater diluted to 10 g/l chloride could be treated well: sulphate concentration decreased by 80% and COD by 40%. Removal efficiencies of the combined anaerobic-aerobic treatment were approximately 80-85%, proving that this was a feasible route for 2-3 x diluted wastewater. The study has shown that several alternatives are available for treatment of the very saline wastewaters at a much lower degree of dilution than currently practiced.