In today's world, due to the advancement of technology, predicting the students' performance is among the most beneficial and essential research topics. Data Mining is extremely helpful in the field of education, especially for analyzing students' performance. It is a fact that predicting the students' performance has become a severe challenge because of the imbalanced datasets in this field, and there is not any comparison among different resampling methods. This paper attempts to compare various resampling techniques such as Borderline SMOTE, Random Over Sampler, SMOTE, SMOTE-ENN, SVM-SMOTE, and SMOTE-Tomek to handle the imbalanced data problem while predicting students' performance using two different datasets. Moreover, the difference between multiclass and binary classification, and structures of the features are examined. To be able to check the performance of the resampling methods better in solving the imbalanced problem, this paper uses various machine learning classifiers including Random Forest, K-Nearest-Neighbor, Artificial Neural Network, XG-boost, Support Vector Machine (Radial Basis Function), Decision Tree, Logistic Regression, and Naïve Bayes. Furthermore, the Random hold-out and Shuffle 5-fold cross-validation methods are used as model validation techniques. The achieved results using different evaluation metrics indicate that fewer numbers of classes and nominal features will lead models to better performance. Also, classifiers do not perform well with imbalanced data, so solving this problem is necessary. The performance of classifiers is improved using balanced datasets. Additionally, the results of the Friedman test, which is a statistical significance test, confirm that the SVM-SMOTE is more efficient than the other resampling methods. Moreover, The Random Forest classifier has achieved the best result among all other models while using SVM-SMOTE as a resampling method. INDEX TERMS Classification, data mining, educational data mining, imbalanced data problem, machine learning, resampling methods, statistical analysis.

Due to the increasing technological advances in all fields, a considerable amount of data has been collected to be processed for different purposes. Data mining is the process of determining and analyzing hidden information from different perspectives to obtain useful knowledge. Data mining can have many various applications, one of them is in medical diagnosis. Today, many diseases are regarded as dangerous and deadly. Heart disease, breast cancer, and diabetes are among the most dangerous ones. This paper investigates 168 articles associated with the implementation of data mining for diagnosing such diseases. The study concentrates on 85 selected papers which have received more attention between 1997 and 2018. All algorithms, data mining models, and evaluation methods are thoroughly reviewed with special consideration. The study attempts to determine the most efficient data mining methods used for medical diagnosing purposes. Also, one of the other significant results of this study is the detection of research gaps in the application of data mining in health care.

Due to the development of biomedical equipment and healthcare level, especially in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), a considerable amount of data has been collected for analysis. Mortality prediction in the ICUs is considered as one of the most important topics in the healthcare data analysis section. A precise prediction of the mortality risk for patients in ICU could provide us with valuable information about patients' lives and reduce costs at the earliest possible stage. This paper aims to introduce a new hybrid predictive model using the Genetic Algorithm as a feature selection method and a new ensemble classifier based on the combination of Stacking and Boosting ensemble methods to create an early mortality prediction model on a highly imbalanced dataset. The SVM-SMOTE method is used to solve the imbalanced data problem. This paper compares the new model with various machine learning models to validate the efficiency of the introduced model. The achieved results using the shuffle 5-fold cross-validation and random hold-out methods indicate that the new hybrid model has the best performance among other classifiers. Additionally, the Friedman test is applied as a statistical significance test to examine the differences between classifiers. The results of the statistical analysis prove that the proposed model is more effective than other classifiers. Furthermore, the proposed model is compared to APACHE and SAPS scoring systems and is benchmarked against state-of-the-art predictive models applied to the MIMIC dataset for experimental validation and achieved promising results as it outperformed the state-of-the-art models.

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to estimate energy efficiency of 132 countries from 2007 to 2014 according to their performance, categorizing the nations into similar groups. Design/methodology/approach Data envelopment analysis model based on Goal Programming and then K-Means clustering algorithm are used to determine the efficiency and clustering the nations based on their efficiency performances. Findings The results of the study reveal that developing low-income countries could lead to high energy-efficiency scores, and countries with different development and income levels can become efficient in the field of energy consumption. Following the nations during a seven-year period also indicates that the changes in energy-related indicators such as renewable energy consumption and energy productivity are the main drivers to move a country between clusters. Originality/value The present study aimed to investigate whether similar nations with similar energy efficiency level in a cluster are similar in their development and income level, and changing the energy consumption pattern during the seven-year period could move the countries from a cluster to another one.

No abstract

The mismatch between students’ anthropometric measures and school furniture dimensions have been investigated in many countries. In Iran, collegians spend at least a quarter of the day hours at university in the sitting position, so it is essential to evaluate furniture mismatch among university students. In Iranian universities, the use of chairs with an attached table is widespread, while the study of mismatches in these chairs among the collegian community is rare. This study was aimed to compare and rank different classroom furniture types based on the mismatch between collegians’ anthropometric measures and the dimensions of classroom furniture among Industrial Engineering students by developing a Multi-Criteria Decision Making approach in an integrated Methodology. The sample consisted of 111 participants (71 males, 40 females). Ten anthropometric measures were gathered, together with eight furniture dimensions for four types of chairs. Mismatch analyses were carried out using mismatch equations, and the Simple Additive Weighting method was used as a base method to solve the decision-making problem. The results indicated that Underneath Desk Height and Seat to Desk Clearance showed the highest levels of the match, while Seat Width presents the highest levels of low mismatch. According to the results, Type 1 and Type 3 were the best current classroom furniture. The Sensitivity Analysis was performed in two ways: changing the weights of criteria in nine scenarios and comparing the results with five other MCDM methods. The proposed MCDM approach can be used widely in furniture procurement processes and educational environments.

Nowadays, according to spectacular improvement in health care and biomedical level, a tremendous amount of data is recorded by hospitals. In addition, the most effective approach to reduce disease mortality is to diagnose it as soon as possible. As a result, data mining by applying machine learning in the field of diseases provides good opportunities to examine the hidden patterns of this collection. An exact forecast of the mortality after heart surgery will cause Successful medical treatment and fewer costs. This research wants to recommend a new stacking predictive model after utilizing the random forest feature importance method to foresee the mortality after heart surgery on a highly unbalanced dataset by using the most practical features. To solve the unbalanced data problem, a combination of the SVM-SMOTE over-sampling algorithm and the Edited-Nearest-Neighbor undersampling algorithm is used. This research compares the introduced model with some other machine learning classifiers to ensure efficiency through shuffle hold-out and 10-fold cross-validation strategies. In order to validate the performance of the implemented machine learning methods in this research, both shuffle hold-out, and 10-fold cross-validation results indicated that our model had the highest efficiency compared to the other models. Furthermore, the Friedman statistical test is applied to survey the differences between models. The result demonstrates that the introduced stacking model reached the most accurate predicting performance after Logistic Regression.

No abstract