Background and Objectives The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic has impacted blood systems worldwide. Challenges included maintaining blood supplies and initiating the collection and use of COVID‐19 convalescent plasma (CCP). Sharing information on the challenges can help improve blood collection and utilization. Materials and Methods A survey questionnaire was distributed to International Society of Blood Transfusion members in 95 countries. We recorded respondents' demographic information, impacts on the blood supply, CCP collection and use, transfusion demands and operational challenges. Results Eighty‐two responses from 42 countries, including 24 low‐ and middle‐income countries, were analysed. Participants worked in national (26.8%) and regional (26.8%) blood establishments and hospital‐based (42.7%) institutions. CCP collection and transfusion were reported by 63% and 36.6% of respondents, respectively. Decreases in blood donations occurred in 70.6% of collecting facilities. Despite safety measures and recruitment strategies, donor fear and refusal of institutions to host blood drives were major contributing factors. Almost half of respondents working at transfusion medicine services were from large hospitals with over 10,000 red cell transfusions per year, and 76.8% of those hospitals experienced blood shortages. Practices varied in accepting donors for blood or CCP donations after a history of COVID‐19 infection, CCP transfusion, or vaccination. Operational challenges included loss of staff, increased workloads and delays in reagent supplies. Almost half of the institutions modified their disaster plans during the pandemic. Conclusion The challenges faced by blood systems during the COVID‐19 pandemic highlight the need for guidance, harmonization, and strengthening of the preparedness and the capacity of blood systems against future infectious threats.

No abstract

The treatment of ulcerative colitis (inflammatory bowel disease, IBD) has been achieved by using colon specific drug delivery system bearing 5-ASA and Camylofine dihydrochloride. Chitosan microspheres were prepared separately for both the drugs using emulsion method followed by enteric coating with EudragitS-100. The in vitro drug release was investigated in different simulated GIT medium. The drug release in PBS (pH7.4) and simulated gastric fluid has shown almost similar pattern and rate, whereas a significant increase in drug release (70.3 +/- 1.36 and 72.5 +/- 1.33% of 5-ASA and Camylofine, respectively) was observed in medium containing 3% rat caecal matter, after 24 h. In control study, 57.1 +/- 1.13% of 5-ASA and 59.2 +/- 1.2% of Camylofine release was observed in 24 h. For enzyme induction, rats were orally administered with 1 mL of 1% w/v dispersion of chitosan for 5 days and release rate studies were conducted in SCF with 3% w/v of caecal matter. An enhanced drug release (i.e., 92.3 +/- 3.81 and 95.5 +/- 3.52% 5-ASA and Camylofine, respectively) was observed after 24 h in dissolution medium containing 3% caecal content obtained from enzyme induced animals. In vivo data showed that microspheres delivered most of its drug load (76.55 +/- 2.13%) to the colon after 9 h, which reflects its targeting potential to the colon. It is concluded that orally administered microspheres of both drugs can be used together for the specific delivery of drug to the colon and reduce symptoms of ulcerative colitis.

No abstract

The complex etiology, pathogenesis and management of Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (immune mediated) has drawn keen interest of not only the obstetricians and pediatricians worldwide but has also fascinated immohematologists over decades. Our understanding of this disease has evolved significantly in the recent past and as we usher into the era of precision medicine and molecular testing, the incidence of HDFN has remarkably reduced, especially in the developed countries. It still remains a cause of concern in the developing countries, where it is most commonly associated with Rh 'D' negative antenatal cases. There are multiple factors involved in the pathogenesis of the disease which warrant different diagnostic approaches as well as treatment protocols as per the severity of the disease. In addition to prophylactic administration of Anti-D immunoglobulin, genotype testing will pave the way for future guidelines. With due consideration on cases with specific requirement for molecular testing, a cost-effective approach may be implemented.