Hypocalcemia is the most frequent major complication following total thyroidectomy (TT), delaying timely hospital demission. We prospectively evaluated the diagnostic utility of parathyroid hormone (PTH) measured one hour after TT and the delta (post-minus pre-surgery) PTH in order to determine which biomarker best predicted post-surgery hypocalcemia. Ninety-six consecutive patients, with either plurinodular goiter, Graves' disease or cervico-mediastinal goiter (22 (23%) men and 74 (77%) women, mean age 48.5 ± 15.2 and 47.9 ± 13.2 years, respectively), scheduled to undergo TT were enrolled. PTH was measured prior and one hour after surgery. Delta PTH was defined as one-hour post-surgery values minus pre-surgery PTH level. Hypocalcemia was defined as a calcemia under 8.0 mg/dL. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the Area Under Curve (AUC), sensibility and specificity of the two biomarkers for the occurrence of hypocalcemia. Forty-nine (51%) patients presented biochemical values under the cut-off but only 17 (18%) had clinical symptoms. Both variables yielded statistically significant AUC (PTH one-hour post surgery: 0.654; p = 0.0403; 95%CI: 0.519-0.773 and delta PTH: 0.659; p = 0.0263; 95%CI: 0.527-0.776). Although comparison of the two ROC curves did not yield significant differences, delta PTH yielded a better sensitivity and PTH one-hour post-TT yielded a marginally better specificity (sensitivity of 50% and 87% and specificity of 76% and 67% for cut-offs of <39.8 pg/dl and <54.5 pg/dl, respectively). Both biomarkers have similar diagnostic accuracy for hypocalcemia, and can be used to indicate when supplemental therapy should be implemented in order to favor a timely discharge.

Background: colorectal cancer (CRC) has a multifactorial etiology which comprises microbiota, genetic predisposition, diet, environmental factors, and last but not least, a substantial contribution by inflammation. The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review of the literature regarding the strong link between inflammation and colorectal cancer. Methods: A systematic review of the literature on PubMed (Medline), Scopus, Cochrane and EMBase databases was performed, following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Each paper was reviewed by two groups of researchers in a single-blind format by using a pre-planned Microsoft© Excel® grid. Results: Using automated research filters, 14,566 studies were included, but 1% was found significant by the reviewers. Seventy pathways of inflammation were described in the sequence of inflammation-carcinogenesis, and anti-tumorigenic molecules were also found. Conclusion: several studies suggest a strong role of inflammation in the tumorigenesis of colorectal cancer through different pathways: this may have a diagnostic and clinical role and also therapeutic purpose in preventing carcinogenesis by treating inflammation. In vitro tests support this theory, even if many other clinical trials are necessary. The present paper was registered in the OpenScience Framework registry (Identifier: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/2KG7T).

Background. Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann’s procedure (LHR) offers reduced morbidity compared with open Hartmann’s reversal (OHR). The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of laparoscopic versus open Hartmann reversal. Materials and Methods. Thirty-four patients who underwent Hartmann reversal between January 2017 and July 2019 were evaluated. Patients underwent either LHR (n = 17) or OHR (n = 17). Variables such as numbers of patients, patient’s age, sex, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) score, indication for previous open sigmoid resection, mean operation time, rate of conversion to open surgery, length of hospital stay, mortality, and morbidity were retrospectively evaluated. Results. The two groups of patients were homogeneous for gender, age, body mass index, cause of primary surgery, time to reversal, and comorbidities. In 97% of the cases, HP was done by open surgery. Our data revealed no difference in mean operation time (LHR: 180.5 ± 35.1 vs. OHR: 225.2 ± 48.4) and morbidity rate, although, in OHR group, there were more severe complications. Less intraoperative blood loss (LHR: 100 ± 40 mL vs. OHR: 450 ± 125 mL; p value <0.001), shorter time to flatus (LHR: 2.4 days vs. OHR: 3.6 days; p value <0.021), and shorter hospitalization (LHR: 4.4 vs. OHR: 11.2 days; p value <0.001) were observed in the LHR group. Mortality rate was null in both groups. Discussion. LHR is feasible and safe even for patients who received a primary open Hartmann’s procedure. We suggest careful patient’s selection allowing LHR procedures to highly skilled laparoscopy surgeons.

BackgroundPrimary colorectal lymphoma represents a rare minority among the colonic neoplasms. Early diagnosis is often difficult because of unspecific symptoms, with subsequent delays in diagnosis and management. We describe a rare case of colonic lymphoma presenting with synchronous liver metastasis.Case presentationA 70-year-old male with a 6-mo history of vague abdominal pain, constipation and melena was referred to our hospital. Computed tomography scan of abdomen revealed the presence of a mass along the proximal ascending colon. Colonoscopy biopsy showed external compression of the cecum with two ulcerations of mucosa, but it was not consistent for a definitive diagnosis. Because the difficulties in the preoperative pathological diagnosis, the high risk of bowel obstruction and the correlated hemorrhagic risk, the patient underwent a right hemicolectomy associated with locoregional lymphadenectomy and liver resection.The surgically resected right colon and liver tumors were all immunohistochemically diagnosed as diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL). The patient refused any other antineoplastic treatment; he is alive and free of disease at 3 years after initial diagnosis.ConclusionsPrimary colonic lymphomas represent a rare minority among the colonic neoplasms. Their correct pre-operative identification is crucial for the design of treatment. This case highlights the difficulty in diagnosing of primary colonic lymphoma. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a colonic lymphoma presenting with a colonic mass and a synchronous liver metastasis.

No abstract