Foreword I n July 2019, a panel of wound care experts, educators and researchers met in the UK to review the literature on medical adhesive-related skin injury and discuss best practice for its assessment and prevention. e two-day meeting resulted in this consensus document, which is intended for anyone who uses adhesive medical devices. e document aims to raise awareness of the widespread occurrence of medical adhesive-related skin injury and the burden it imposes on patients, health professionals and the health service. It seeks to encourage a change in culture, whereby risk assessment and prevention of medical adhesive-related skin injury are considered an integral part of patient care. e document, therefore, provides recommendations for the assessment and prevention of this type of injury, with a view to standardising care across all healthcare settings. It also highlights the need for education on this form of skin damage, which needs to become a core topic in skin care and wound management. Until this happens, there is scope for multidisciplinary teams to provide local training on this subject. In the light of the panel's concern that many health professionals are not only unaware of this avoidable harm but also its abbreviation, MARSI, the term is written in full throughout the document. e panel hopes that implementation of the guidance in this document will reduce avoidable patient su ering and promote better outcomes. Sian Fumarola, Senior Clinical Nurse Specialist, Tissue Viability and Continence, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, UK Overview of medical adhesive-related skin injury 'Medical adhesive-related skin injury' is a term used to defi ne any skin damage related to the use of medical adhesive products or devices such as tapes, wound dressings, stoma products, electrodes, medication patches and wound closure strips. This type of injury is largely avoidable
The SAP dressing was well tolerated and shown to be effective in the management of moderate-to-high exudate. Consequently, the dressing supported improved healing, and reduced damage to periwound skin, leading to lower pain levels. Overall, both the patients and clinicians rated the SAP highly.
Objective: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the fluid management capabilities of a superabsorbent wound dressing (Zetuvit Plus Silicone), with secondary objectives related to parameters that support whether the dressing enables undisturbed healing. Method: This study was an open labelled non-comparative study. Patients included in the study were selected by the clinical investigator(s) according to whether the patient required a dressing for the management of moderately to highly exuding wounds. Results: A total of 50 patients were included in the study. Results related to the primary objective demonstrated that the superabsorbent wound dressing was able to absorb all levels of exudate across the range (low to high). At each assessment time point these results show that in 98% of assessments the superabsorbent dressing was rated as ‘very good’ (91%) or ‘good’ (7%) at exudate management. Secondary objectives relating to wound bed preparation, healing and management of pain were also positive. Additionally, at the end of each patient treatment, the dressing's fluid management capabilities were rated overall as ‘excellent’ (100% of cases). There was little pain associated with the wound or at dressing change throughout the study and its flexibility/conformability allowed for comfort and patient satisfaction aligned with increased quality of life. Additionally, inclusion of a silicone adhesive layer allowed painless and atraumatic removal of the dressing, increasing patient comfort, both during wear and at dressing removal, and supported the description of enabling undisturbed wound healing. Conclusion: The superabsorbent wound dressing achieved the primary objective relating to wound exudate management in all the assessments undertaken in this study. In addition, the silicone interface allowed for undisturbed healing as evidenced by little or no adherence of the dressing to underlying tissue, preventing damage to periwound skin. Overall, the superabsorbent wound dressing with the addition of the silicone interface could offer advantages over other superabsorbent polymer dressings (that might adhere to the wound surface) or silicone wound dressings (that might not have the absorbent properties of this type of dressing).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.