No abstract

No abstract

Epithelioid sarcoma (ES) is an uncommon sarcoma. Lately, its variants, including proximal-type ES, have been recognized. The present study highlights clinicopathological features of 26 (65%) conventional and 14 (35%) cases of proximal-type ES. Thirty-eight percent of cases were seen in 21-30-year age group, including 77.5% cases in men. Extremities were the commonest sites in both the subtypes. Histologically, conventional-type ES displayed nodular tumor aggregates with necrosis, while proximal-type showed solid arrangement of large, "rhabdoid-like" cells. More cases (64.2%) of the proximal type were of grade 3. A range of differential diagnoses was considered. Most important immunohistochemical markers were vimentin, epithelial membrane antigen, cytokeratin, CD34, and desmin. Maximum (72.5%) cases were treated surgically. Recurrences and metastasis were observed more in the proximal type. The 7-year disease-free survival was 19.4% in the conventional and nil in the proximal subtype (p = 0.06). The overall survival rate was also lower in the proximal (31.3%) than conventional type (90.2%; p < 0.001). Other unfavorable parameters were deeper location, larger size, and higher tumor stage. This unusual sarcoma, with characteristic growth patterns, merits a proper histological evaluation, as it has many mimics. Proximal-type ES is rather a morphological subtype, associated with an aggressive course.

(I) To assess the feasibility of thromboplastin-plasma (TP) method for cell block, (II) to concentrate the minimal cellular material from effusions and needle-rinses by block preparation and improve visual details, (III) to compare conventional cytological smears with cell blocks for final assessment, and (IV) to assess utility of immunocytochemistry (ICC) for diagnostic accuracy. Seventy cell blocks were prepared by TP technique using surplus fluid from 38 serous effusions, and for 32 ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) material, rinses of syringes and needles were collected in normal saline after conventional cytological smears. Then, cell blocks were compared with conventional smears for adequacy, morphologic preservation, and ICC. Absolute concordance seen in 66 cases (94%) between the smears and cell blocks. Advantages with the blocks were cellular concentration in a limited field and better cellular preservation with architectural pattern. Quality of ICC was comparable to that of standard controls. Diagnostic discrepancy was seen in two cases where cell blocks were positive but smears were negative. Two cell blocks were nonrepresentative. Cell block serves as a useful adjunct to traditional cytological smears. TP method is simple, cost effective, and reproducible. It is easy when compared with agar-embedding technique. Ancillary techniques like ICC can be performed successfully.

BCT is technically feasible and safe post neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in women with LABC with no detriment in outcome.