THE GEOMETRICAL STUDY OF LENSES was essential for the development of optics in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries.' This study, which historians have seen as a turning point in the history of optics, was designated as either anaclastics or dioptrics. In writing the history of this chapter, it is common practice to give prominence to Kepler, some of Mersenne's circle, Willebrord Snellius, and Descartes. Furthermore, the perceived modernity of the optics of this period is frequently explained, partially at least, by external reasons: a very modest technical advance in the construction of optical instruments.A reading of the eleventh-century Book of Optics (Kitab al-Mancdir) by Ibn al-Haytham, however, whether in Arabic or in Latin translation, should have suggested to historians that research on anaclastics started well before the late sixteenth century. In Book 7 there is a study of the spherical diopter and the spherical lens.2 Furthermore, Ibn al-Haytham devoted an entire memoir to the burning sphere, whose scientific and historical importance is unanimously recognized. This work contains an examination of double refraction in the sphere and of related problems. Three centuries later, Kamal al-Din al-Farisi wrote a commentary on the work and used it for the first correct explanation of the rainbow.3 Until now, however, historians have not constructed a clear picture of Ibn al-Haytham's research on lenses and of anaclastics in general. For example,
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.