Ralf Brand and Andrew Karvonen (The ecosystem of expertise: complementary knowledges for sustainable development. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 3(1), pp 21-31, Spring 2007) suggest that sustainability poses challenges to the discourse of technical experts and that many existing models do not fit with traditional disciplinary boundaries. In this context, the education of engineers and scientists in sustainability literacy has to be regarded afresh. Brand and Karvonen argue for the development of 'meta-experts' who have '... a clear understanding of what specific disciplines can and cannot contribute to problems of sustainability.' Our own approach arose from a concern for developing graduates to tackle and ameliorate global issues, many of which might be deemed as problems of sustainability and all of which might be considered as 'wicked'. To that end, higher education has to be seen as inter-disciplinary, student-centred and problem-based. As part of the development of these ideas, we obtained funding from the Royal Academy of Engineering to design and run a pilot module on sustainable development for engineers and scientists.This paper looks at the curriculum design process, the development of the case studies used, the mode of assessment (including the use of modified essay questions) and the way in which the programme was received by students and facilitators. The mode of delivery was essentially that of problem-based learning and small groups, drawn from across one science and three engineering programmes, were each facilitated by a post-doctoral researcher who was specially trained for the task. The students undertook a readiness for inter-professional learning questionnaire, a learning styles questionnaire and a self-evaluation questionnaire both in the initial stages and at the end of the pilot programme and these have formed part of the evaluation. The principal means of evaluation, however, has been through a nominal group process, both for students and for facilitators. The results of these evaluations form the final part of the paper.
The world faces a number of complex challenges that are sometimes referred to as ‘wicked problems.’ Universities have been relatively poor at preparing graduates for such challenges, yet it will be the future professionals who need to tackle the problems. This essay looks at two related projects that have attempted to advance the skills training of graduates for a complex world, in the context of educating engineers and scientists in sustainable development.A Delphi study conducted in the UK suggested that systemic, student-centred approaches were vital to the appropriate development of undergraduates to become engineers with skills in sustainable development. A pilot project sponsored by the UK Royal Academy of Engineering developed an inter-disciplinary course unit, using student-centred principles, to embed the principles of sustainable development, in its broadest sense, in the curricula of engineers and scientists. The essay includes an evaluation of this approach.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.