There is a dearth of reliable information on the effectiveness of TB stigma-reduction interventions. Knowledge-shaping, attitude-changing and patient-support interventions can be effective in reducing TB stigma, but more rigorous evaluations are needed.

BackgroundThere is uncertainty about the contribution that social support interventions (SSI) can have in mitigating the personal, social and economic costs of tuberculosis (TB) treatment on patients, and improving treatment outcomes.ObjectiveTo identify psycho-emotional (PE) and socio-economic (SE) interventions provided to TB patients and to assess the effects of these interventions on treatment adherence and treatment outcomes.Search strategyWe searched PubMed and Embase from 1 January 1990–15 March 2015 and abstracts of the Union World Conference on Lung Health from 2010–2014 for studies reporting TB treatment adherence and treatment outcomes following SSI.Selection criteriaStudies measuring the effects of PE or SE interventions on TB treatment adherence, treatment outcomes, and/or financial burden.Data collection and analysisTwo reviewers independently assessed titles and abstracts for inclusion of articles. One reviewer reviewed full text articles and the reference list of selected studies. A second reviewer double checked all extracted information against the articles.Main resultsTwenty-five studies were included in the qualitative analysis; of which eighteen were included in the meta-analysis. Effects were pooled from 11 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), including 9,655 participants with active TB. Meta-analysis showed that PE support (RR 1.37; CI 1.08–1.73), SE support (RR 1.08; CI 1.03–1.13) and combined PE and SE support (RR 1.17; CI 1.12–1.22) were associated with a significant improvement of successful treatment outcomes. Also PE support, SE support and a combination of these types of support were associated with reductions in unsuccessful treatment outcomes (PE: RR 0.46; CI 0.22–0.96, SE: RR 0.78; CI 0.69–0.88 and Combined PE and SE: RR 0.42; CI 0.23–0.75). Evidence on the effect of PE and SE interventions on treatment adherence were not meta-analysed because the interventions were too heterogeneous to pool. No evidence was found to show whether SE reduced the financial burden for TB patients.Discussion and ConclusionsOur review and meta-analysis concluded that PE and SE interventions are associated with beneficial effects on TB treatment outcomes. However, the quality of evidence is very low and future well-designed evaluation studies are needed.

Achondroplasia is a genetic disorder that results in disproportionate short stature. The true prevalence of achondroplasia is unknown as estimates vary widely. This systematic literature review and meta‐analysis was conducted to better estimate worldwide achondroplasia birth prevalence. PubMed, Embase, Scielo, and Google Scholar were searched, complemented by manual searching, for peer‐reviewed articles published between 1950 and 2019. Eligible articles were identified by two independent researchers using predefined selection criteria. Birth prevalence estimates were extracted for analysis, and the quality of evidence was assessed. A meta‐analysis using a quality effects approach based on the inverse variance fixed effect model was conducted. The search identified 955 unique articles, of which 52 were eligible and included. Based on the meta‐analysis, the worldwide birth prevalence of achondroplasia was estimated to be 4.6 per 100,000. Substantial regional variation was observed with a considerably higher birth prevalence reported in North Africa and the Middle East compared to other regions, particularly Europe and the Americas. Higher birth prevalence was also reported in specialized care settings. Significant heterogeneity (Higgins I2 of 84.3) was present and some indication of publication bias was detected, based on visual asymmetry of the Doi plot with a Furuya‐Kanamori index of 2.73. Analysis of pooled data from the current literature yields a worldwide achondroplasia birth prevalence of approximately 4.6 per 100,000, with considerable regional variation. Careful interpretation of these findings is advised as included studies are of broadly varying methodological quality.

BackgroundGastroenteritis caused by rotavirus accounts for considerable morbidity in young children. We aimed to assess the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of the oral rotavirus vaccine Rotarix, as measured by laboratory-confirmed rotavirus infection after referral to hospital and/or emergency departments in children aged <5 years with gastroenteritis.MethodsWe performed a systematic search for peer-reviewed studies conducted in real-life settings published between 2006 and 2016 and a meta-analysis to calculate the overall Rotarix VE, which was further discriminated through stratified analyses.ResultsThe overall VE estimate was 69% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62% to 75%); stratified analyses revealed a non-negligible impact of factors such as study design and socioeconomic status. Depending on the control group, VE ranged from 63% (95% CI, 52% to 72%) to 81% (95% CI, 69% to 88%) for unmatched and matched rotavirus test–negative controls. VE varied with socioeconomic status: 81% (95% CI, 74% to 86%) in high-income countries, 54% (95% CI, 39% to 65%) in upper-middle-income countries, and 63% (95% CI, 50% to 72%) in lower-middle-income countries. Age, rotavirus strain, and disease severity were also shown to impact VE, but to a lesser extent.ConclusionsThis meta-analysis of real-world studies showed that Rotarix is effective in helping to prevent hospitalizations and/or emergency department visits due to rotavirus infection.

Fifteen million people each year receive post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) to prevent rabies, yet the disease remains neglected and highly under-reported. Areas covered: In this systematic literature review, we assessed the immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety of a purified chick embryo cell-culture rabies vaccine (PCECV) for PEP against rabies by intramuscular (IM) or intradermal (ID) administration. We performed meta-analyses to compare immunogenicity according to the route of vaccine administration, study population, and PEP regimen, such as number of doses, and concomitant rabies immunoglobulin. Expert commentary: There were 54 estimates of immune responses to vaccination, which showed that in the overall population, after starting PEP with PCECV by the IM or ID route (≥2.5 IU per dose), almost all individuals had rabies virus neutralizing antibody (RVNA) titers above the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended serological threshold for an adequate immune response to vaccination (RVNA ≥0.5 IU/ml by day 14). In the overall population, PCECV had an acceptable safety profile. However, given that there are 59,000 human rabies deaths reported annually, the challenge is to improve access to PCECV for PEP against human rabies.