Pazopanib maintenance therapy provided a median improvement of 5.6 months (HR, 0.77) in progression-free survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who have not progressed after first-line chemotherapy. Overall survival data to this point did not suggest any benefit. Additional analysis should help to identify subgroups of patients in whom improved efficacy may balance toxicity (NCT00866697).

This manuscript reports the consensus statements regarding recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), reached at the fifth Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference (OCCC), which was held in Tokyo, Japan, in November 2015. Three important questions were identified: (i) What are the subgroups for clinical trials in ROC? The historical definition of using platinum-free interval (PFI) to categorise patients as having platinum-sensitive/resistant disease was replaced by therapy-free interval (TFI). TFI can be broken down into TFIp (PFI), TFInp (non-PFI) and TFIb (biological agent-free interval). Additional criteria to consider include histology, BRCA mutation status, number/type of previous therapies, outcome of prior surgery and patient reported symptoms. (ii) What are the control arms for clinical trials in ROC? When platinum is considered the best option, the control arm should be a platinum-based therapy with or without an anti-angiogenic agent or a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor. If platinum is not considered the best option, the control arm could include a non-platinum drug, either as single agent or in combination. (iii) What are the endpoints for clinical trials in ROC? Overall survival (OS) is the preferred endpoint for patient cohorts with an expected median OS < or = 12 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) is an alternative, and it is the preferred endpoint when the expected median OS is > 12 months. However, PFS alone should not be the only endpoint and must be supported by additional endpoints including pre-defined patient reported outcomes (PROs), time to second subsequent therapy (TSST), or time until definitive deterioration of quality of life (TUDD).

No abstract

Background: Persistent infection following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a frustrating entity for the patient and rhinologist alike. Mupirocin nasal washes have been proposed as an efficacious treatment in such patients. Two small studies have reported excellent short‐term posttreatment outcomes; however, the long‐term microbiological outcomes following treatment are not known; likewise, the rate of mupirocin‐resistance following treatment has not been explored. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of 61 patients with Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus)‐positive surgically‐recalcitrant CRS having undergone 0.05% mupirocin nasal rinse treatment, twice daily for 4 weeks. Specific outcomes reported included posttreatment culture results, time to first posttreatment S. aureus culture, and mupirocin‐sensitivity following treatment. Results: Of 57 patients meeting minimal posttreatment follow‐up criteria, 42 (73.7%) progressed to microbiological failure by subsequently cultured S. aureus. Mean time to first positive culture was 144 days. Of the 42 patients who progressed to microbiological relapse, full antibiotic sensitivity data was available for 41; of these, only 1 was found to subsequently harbor a mupirocin‐resistant strain of S. aureus, thus yielding a posttreatment resistance rate of 2.4%. Conclusion: Treatment with mupirocin nasal washes in S. aureus–positive, surgically recalcitrant CRS has a high microbiological failure rate, with 73.7% of patients subsequently re‐culturing S. aureus. Our current treatment regime of 0.05% nasal washes twice daily for 4 weeks is associated with a posttreatment resistance rate that is consistent with other studies of topical mupirocin use, suggesting that mupirocin washes are no more likely to induce resistance than nasal vestibule decolonization in the high‐risk medical or surgical patient. © 2011 ARS‐AAOA, LLC.

5501 Background: The role of secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) has not been defined by level-1 evidence. Methods: Pts with OC and 1st relapse after 6+ mos platin-free interval (TFIp) were eligible if they presented with a positive AGO-score (PS ECOG 0, ascites ≤500 ml, and complete resection at initial surgery) and were randomized to 2nd-line chemotherapy alone vs cytoreductive surgery followed by chemo. Chemo regimens were selected according to the institutional standard. We report here results of the predetermined interim analysis. Results: 407pts were randomized 2010-2014. The TFIp exceeded 12 mos in 75% and 76% pts in both arms. 8.9% of 203 pts were operated despite of randomization to the no-surgery arm, whereas 6.9% of 204 pts in the surgery arm did not undergo operation. Complete resection was achieved in 67% of pts; 87% and 88% received a platinum-containing 2nd-line therapy. Median PFS was 14 mos without and 19.6 mos with surgery (HR: 0.66, 95%CI 0.52-0.83, p<0.001). Median time to start of first subsequent therapy (TFST) was 21 vs 13.9 mos in favor of the surgery arm (HR 0.61, 95%CI 0.48-0.77, p=p<0.001). PFS-2 between 1st and 2nd relapse equaled or even exceeded PFS-1 before 1strelapse in 26% after surgery and only 16% without-surgery. Analysis of the primary endpoint OS is kept blinded due to immaturity and will be evaluated after extended follow-up (the observed pooled unblinded 2-YSR was 83% instead of the initially in the protocol assumed 55-66%). 60d mortality rates were 0 and 0.5% in the surgery and no-surgery arm. Re-laparatomies were performed in 7 pts (3.5%) in the surgery arm.With the exception of myelosuppression which occurred more frequently in the no-surgery arm no further significant differences were observed with respect to grade 3+ acute adverse events. Conclusions: Surgery in pts with 1st relapse of OC after a TFIp of 6+ mos and selected by a positive AGO-Score resulted in a clinically meaningful increase of PFS and TFST with acceptable treatment burden. Until final OS data will definitively define the role of secondary cytoreductive surgery it should at least be considered as valuable option in pts with a positive AGO-Score. Clinical trial information: NCT01166737.

No abstract

6000 Background: The role of secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) has been under debate for decades. A recent trial in unselected patients (pts) failed to show an OS benefit. Methods: Pts with ROC and 1st relapse after 6+ months (mos) platinum-free interval (TFIp) were eligible if they presented with a positive AGO-score (PS ECOG 0, ascites ≤500 ml, and complete resection at initial surgery) and were prospectively randomized to second-line chemotherapy alone vs. cytoreductive surgery followed by the same chemotherapy; platinum combination therapy was recommended. OS was primary endpoint in this superiority trial. Results: 407pts were randomized 2010-2014. The TFIp exceeded 12 mos in 75% of pts. 206 pts were allocated to the surgery arm of whom finally 187 (91%) were operated. A complete resection was achieved in 75%; almost 90% in both arms received a platinum-containing second-line chemo. Primary endpoint analysis showed median OS of 53.7 mos with and 46.2 mos without surgery (HR 0.76, 95%CI 0.59-0.97, p=0.03); median PFS was 18.4 and 14 mos (HR: 0.66, 95%CI 0.54-0.82, p<0.001), median time to start of first subsequent therapy (TFST) was 17.9 vs. 13.7 mos in favor of the surgery arm (HR 0.65, 95%CI 0.52-0.81, p<0.001). An analysis according to treatment showed an OS benefit exceeding 12 mos for pts with complete resection (CR) compared to pts without surgery (median 60.7 vs. 46.2 mos); pts with surgery and incomplete resection even did worse (median 28.8 mos). 60 d mortality rates were 0 and 0.5% in the surgery and no-surgery arm. Re-laparotomies were performed in 3.7% of operated pts. Further grade 3/4 adverse events did not differ significantly between arms. Conclusions: This is the first surgical study demonstrating a meaningful survival benefit in OC: Surgery in pts with first relapse and TFIp of 6+ mos and selected by a positive AGO-Score resulted in a significant increase of OS, PFS and TFST with acceptable morbidity and, therefore, should be offered to suitable pts. The benefit was exclusively seen in pts with CR indicating the importance of both the optimal selection of pts (eg. by AGO score) and of centres with expertise and a high chance of achieving a CR. Clinical trial information: NCT01166737.

No abstract